Mohamed A Ellabban, Ingrid Steinvall, Folke Sjöberg, Moustafa Elmasry
{"title":"锁骨上动脉肌下隧道岛状皮瓣重建远端头颈部烧伤后瘢痕的技术改进。","authors":"Mohamed A Ellabban, Ingrid Steinvall, Folke Sjöberg, Moustafa Elmasry","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) has been used extensively to reconstruct postburn scars in the head and neck region. Its landmark and vascular supply from the supraclavicular artery have been demonstrated before. The aim was to assess its versatility following an increase in pedicle length to be supplied by the transverse cervical artery, along with tunneling the pedicle under the sternocleidomastoid muscle to reach distant sites that the classic SCAIF could not reach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 25 consecutive patients in whom SCAIFs were performed to reconstruct remote head and neck postburn scars. Pedicle length, flap diameter, and complications were recorded with demographic and burn-related data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 18 (72%) men and 7 (18%) women. The mean age was 15.7 years, and the mean injury time was 15 months before flap transfer. Isolated neck injury was the most affected site (44%). The mean length and width of the SCAIF were 16.6 and 6.5 cm, respectively. The mean length of its extended vascular pedicle based on transverse cervical artery was 7.2 cm. The donor site was closed primarily in all cases. All flaps survived completely, except 2 (8%) that exhibited partial necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCAIF is reliable for reconstructing postburn deformities in the head and neck region. Our results indicate that the increased pedicle length and the submuscular tunnel allow reliable distant flap transfer without the risk of excessive traction or vessel kinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical Refinements of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap With Submuscular Tunnel for Reconstruction of Remote Head and Neck Postburn Scars.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed A Ellabban, Ingrid Steinvall, Folke Sjöberg, Moustafa Elmasry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) has been used extensively to reconstruct postburn scars in the head and neck region. Its landmark and vascular supply from the supraclavicular artery have been demonstrated before. The aim was to assess its versatility following an increase in pedicle length to be supplied by the transverse cervical artery, along with tunneling the pedicle under the sternocleidomastoid muscle to reach distant sites that the classic SCAIF could not reach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 25 consecutive patients in whom SCAIFs were performed to reconstruct remote head and neck postburn scars. Pedicle length, flap diameter, and complications were recorded with demographic and burn-related data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 18 (72%) men and 7 (18%) women. The mean age was 15.7 years, and the mean injury time was 15 months before flap transfer. Isolated neck injury was the most affected site (44%). The mean length and width of the SCAIF were 16.6 and 6.5 cm, respectively. The mean length of its extended vascular pedicle based on transverse cervical artery was 7.2 cm. The donor site was closed primarily in all cases. All flaps survived completely, except 2 (8%) that exhibited partial necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCAIF is reliable for reconstructing postburn deformities in the head and neck region. Our results indicate that the increased pedicle length and the submuscular tunnel allow reliable distant flap transfer without the risk of excessive traction or vessel kinking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e6455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828006/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technical Refinements of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap With Submuscular Tunnel for Reconstruction of Remote Head and Neck Postburn Scars.
Background: The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) has been used extensively to reconstruct postburn scars in the head and neck region. Its landmark and vascular supply from the supraclavicular artery have been demonstrated before. The aim was to assess its versatility following an increase in pedicle length to be supplied by the transverse cervical artery, along with tunneling the pedicle under the sternocleidomastoid muscle to reach distant sites that the classic SCAIF could not reach.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 25 consecutive patients in whom SCAIFs were performed to reconstruct remote head and neck postburn scars. Pedicle length, flap diameter, and complications were recorded with demographic and burn-related data.
Results: The study included 18 (72%) men and 7 (18%) women. The mean age was 15.7 years, and the mean injury time was 15 months before flap transfer. Isolated neck injury was the most affected site (44%). The mean length and width of the SCAIF were 16.6 and 6.5 cm, respectively. The mean length of its extended vascular pedicle based on transverse cervical artery was 7.2 cm. The donor site was closed primarily in all cases. All flaps survived completely, except 2 (8%) that exhibited partial necrosis.
Conclusions: The SCAIF is reliable for reconstructing postburn deformities in the head and neck region. Our results indicate that the increased pedicle length and the submuscular tunnel allow reliable distant flap transfer without the risk of excessive traction or vessel kinking.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.