对亲密伴侣谋杀未遂幸存者的社会反应。

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 WOMENS STUDIES Violence Against Women Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1177/10778012251319318
Hila Avieli
{"title":"对亲密伴侣谋杀未遂幸存者的社会反应。","authors":"Hila Avieli","doi":"10.1177/10778012251319318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on women survivors of attempted intimate partner homicide and their postattack experiences, including the response from family, friends, and institutions like police and welfare agencies, is limited. Using the disenfranchized grief framework, this study explores survivors' perceptions of the social response to their experiences. Thirteen participants were interviewed using interpretative phenomenological analysis, yielding four themes: (a) detachment and disregard; (b) disbelief and victim blame; (c) lack of institutional support, and (d) marginality in the legal process. The study findings suggest that both individuals and institutions failed to acknowledge and validate the participants' experiences and thereby hindered their healing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":23606,"journal":{"name":"Violence Against Women","volume":" ","pages":"847-864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12913690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Social Response to Survivors of Attempted Intimate Partner Homicide.\",\"authors\":\"Hila Avieli\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10778012251319318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research on women survivors of attempted intimate partner homicide and their postattack experiences, including the response from family, friends, and institutions like police and welfare agencies, is limited. Using the disenfranchized grief framework, this study explores survivors' perceptions of the social response to their experiences. Thirteen participants were interviewed using interpretative phenomenological analysis, yielding four themes: (a) detachment and disregard; (b) disbelief and victim blame; (c) lack of institutional support, and (d) marginality in the legal process. The study findings suggest that both individuals and institutions failed to acknowledge and validate the participants' experiences and thereby hindered their healing process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"847-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12913690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251319318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence Against Women","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251319318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于试图杀害亲密伴侣的女性幸存者及其事后经历的研究,包括来自家人、朋友以及警察和福利机构等机构的反应,是有限的。利用被剥夺权利的悲伤框架,本研究探讨了幸存者对其经历的社会反应的看法。使用解释性现象学分析对13名参与者进行了采访,得出四个主题:(a)超然和漠视;(b)怀疑和指责受害者;(c)缺乏机构支持和(d)法律程序中的边缘化。研究结果表明,个人和机构都未能承认和验证参与者的经历,从而阻碍了他们的康复过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Social Response to Survivors of Attempted Intimate Partner Homicide.

Research on women survivors of attempted intimate partner homicide and their postattack experiences, including the response from family, friends, and institutions like police and welfare agencies, is limited. Using the disenfranchized grief framework, this study explores survivors' perceptions of the social response to their experiences. Thirteen participants were interviewed using interpretative phenomenological analysis, yielding four themes: (a) detachment and disregard; (b) disbelief and victim blame; (c) lack of institutional support, and (d) marginality in the legal process. The study findings suggest that both individuals and institutions failed to acknowledge and validate the participants' experiences and thereby hindered their healing process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Violence against Women is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of research and information on all aspects of the problem of violence against women. The journal assumes a broad definition of violence; topics to be covered include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, sexual assault, incest, sexual harassment, female infantcide, female circumcision, and female sexual slavery.
期刊最新文献
Development, Validation, and Examination of Psychometric Characteristics of the Obstetric Violence Scale for Pregnant Women. Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Health Outcomes Among Married Women in Cote D'Ivoire. Is 'Victim-Survivor' Our Imperfect Alternative to Describing People with Lived Experience of Sexual Violence? A Feminist Symbolic Interactionist Analysis, Considering How Ethnicity, Gender, and Disability Interact with Language Choice. Animal-Inclusive Protection Order Statutes: A Powerful Tool for Addressing and Mitigating Coercive Control. Higher Sexual Relationship Power Associated With Optimal HIV Treatment and Care Outcomes Among Women Living With HIV in Heterosexual Relationships in Metro Vancouver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1