“庇护,它不再是一个真实的东西”:排除来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的美国寻求庇护者的律师助理和时间模式

IF 0.9 4区 历史学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Latin American Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1177/0094582x251320084
Alisa Garni, Citlally Orozco, Lisa Melander
{"title":"“庇护,它不再是一个真实的东西”:排除来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的美国寻求庇护者的律师助理和时间模式","authors":"Alisa Garni, Citlally Orozco, Lisa Melander","doi":"10.1177/0094582x251320084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments deny people’s internationally recognized rights to asylum by preventing them from arriving in territories where they may request asylum and by using case law to restrict eligibility. While research tends to focus on either deflection or restriction tactics, this paper builds on studies that examine the interaction between them. To further examine the interaction between these “bordering” practices at and beyond the physical U.S. border, we conducted two years of ethnographic research with asylum seekers in three ICE detention centers, one district of the “Migrant Protection Protocols,” and via Title 42 expulsions. We show how paralegal manipulations of time interact with spatial and legal modalities of exclusion to deflect asylum seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean in particular. The result for people who are subjected to these processes is compounded trauma inflicted through a paradoxical combination of state violence and statelessness in the United States and abroad.","PeriodicalId":47390,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Perspectives","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Asylum, it’s not a real thing anymore:” Paralegal and Temporal Modalities for Excluding U.S. Asylum Seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean\",\"authors\":\"Alisa Garni, Citlally Orozco, Lisa Melander\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0094582x251320084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governments deny people’s internationally recognized rights to asylum by preventing them from arriving in territories where they may request asylum and by using case law to restrict eligibility. While research tends to focus on either deflection or restriction tactics, this paper builds on studies that examine the interaction between them. To further examine the interaction between these “bordering” practices at and beyond the physical U.S. border, we conducted two years of ethnographic research with asylum seekers in three ICE detention centers, one district of the “Migrant Protection Protocols,” and via Title 42 expulsions. We show how paralegal manipulations of time interact with spatial and legal modalities of exclusion to deflect asylum seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean in particular. The result for people who are subjected to these processes is compounded trauma inflicted through a paradoxical combination of state violence and statelessness in the United States and abroad.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x251320084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x251320084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各国政府拒绝人民享有国际公认的庇护权,办法是阻止他们抵达可以申请庇护的领土,并利用判例法限制他们的资格。虽然研究往往集中在偏转或限制策略上,但本文建立在研究它们之间相互作用的基础上。为了进一步研究这些“边界”实践之间的相互作用,我们在三个ICE拘留中心,“移民保护协议”的一个地区,并通过第42条驱逐对寻求庇护者进行了为期两年的人种学研究。我们展示了律师助理如何操纵时间与空间和法律形式的排斥相互作用,以转移来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的寻求庇护者。对于那些遭受这些过程的人来说,结果是由于美国和国外的国家暴力和无国籍状态的矛盾组合而造成的复合创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Asylum, it’s not a real thing anymore:” Paralegal and Temporal Modalities for Excluding U.S. Asylum Seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean
Governments deny people’s internationally recognized rights to asylum by preventing them from arriving in territories where they may request asylum and by using case law to restrict eligibility. While research tends to focus on either deflection or restriction tactics, this paper builds on studies that examine the interaction between them. To further examine the interaction between these “bordering” practices at and beyond the physical U.S. border, we conducted two years of ethnographic research with asylum seekers in three ICE detention centers, one district of the “Migrant Protection Protocols,” and via Title 42 expulsions. We show how paralegal manipulations of time interact with spatial and legal modalities of exclusion to deflect asylum seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean in particular. The result for people who are subjected to these processes is compounded trauma inflicted through a paradoxical combination of state violence and statelessness in the United States and abroad.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Latin American Perspectives is a theoretical and scholarly journal for discussion and debate on the political economy of capitalism, imperialism, and socialism in the Americas. The journal"s objective is to encourage class analysis of sociocultural realities and political strategies to transform Latin American sociopolitical structures. The journal makes a conscious effort to publish a diversity of political viewpoints, both Marxist and non-Marxist perspectives, that have influenced progressive debates in Latin America.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Multipolarity in Russia and Latin America in Relation to New Crises Corrigendum to “Fighting Violence Against Women in the Brazilian Amazon: Protecting the Forest and the People Who Inhabit Her” Analysis of Factory Unions in Food Manufacturing Companies During Chile's 2019 Social Revolt: An Examination of Unions’ Roles Using Social Media To Resist is not to Endure: Women Organizing in Resistance to Extractivism in Risaralda, Colombia Dismantling or Drifting? The Politics of Bolsa Família’s Transformation under Brazil’s Far-Right Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1