吸气式与常规PEM燃料电池性能的比较分析与优化

IF 7.8 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Fuel Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134723
Faseeh Abdulrahman , Mohammed S. Ismail , S. Mani Sarathy
{"title":"吸气式与常规PEM燃料电池性能的比较分析与优化","authors":"Faseeh Abdulrahman ,&nbsp;Mohammed S. Ismail ,&nbsp;S. Mani Sarathy","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a critical part of the energy transition as they can be sustainably powered by hydrogen fuel. They have gained significant attention recently due to their compact design and simplified system, which makes them ideal for portable applications. This paper presents a first-of-its-kind comparative study of air-breathing and conventional PEMFCs, conducted using a combined approach of numerical modelling and Taguchi analysis. A comprehensive multiphysics one-dimensional model was developed for each type of fuel cell. The results show that the conventional fuel cell outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell, especially at high current densities. This is due to its significantly higher mass and heat transfer coefficients on the cathode side of the conventional fuel cell, which also enhances its heat dissipation. Taguchi analysis ranked specific design parameters by their impact on fuel cell performance, identifying cathode GDL thickness as the most influential. The results of the parametric study using numerical models confirm this ranking and the significance of the factors proposed by Taguchi analysis. Interestingly, the performance of air-breathing PEMFCs is more sensitive to cathode GDL porosity compared to conventional PEMFCs. This increased sensitivity is primarily due to higher diffusion limitations and a lower oxygen mass transport coefficient in air-breathing PEMFCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"390 ","pages":"Article 134723"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis and optimization of performance of air-breathing and conventional PEM fuel cells\",\"authors\":\"Faseeh Abdulrahman ,&nbsp;Mohammed S. Ismail ,&nbsp;S. Mani Sarathy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a critical part of the energy transition as they can be sustainably powered by hydrogen fuel. They have gained significant attention recently due to their compact design and simplified system, which makes them ideal for portable applications. This paper presents a first-of-its-kind comparative study of air-breathing and conventional PEMFCs, conducted using a combined approach of numerical modelling and Taguchi analysis. A comprehensive multiphysics one-dimensional model was developed for each type of fuel cell. The results show that the conventional fuel cell outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell, especially at high current densities. This is due to its significantly higher mass and heat transfer coefficients on the cathode side of the conventional fuel cell, which also enhances its heat dissipation. Taguchi analysis ranked specific design parameters by their impact on fuel cell performance, identifying cathode GDL thickness as the most influential. The results of the parametric study using numerical models confirm this ranking and the significance of the factors proposed by Taguchi analysis. Interestingly, the performance of air-breathing PEMFCs is more sensitive to cathode GDL porosity compared to conventional PEMFCs. This increased sensitivity is primarily due to higher diffusion limitations and a lower oxygen mass transport coefficient in air-breathing PEMFCs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuel\",\"volume\":\"390 \",\"pages\":\"Article 134723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125004478\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125004478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚合物电解质膜燃料电池(pemfc)是能源转型的关键部分,因为它们可以持续地由氢燃料提供动力。由于其紧凑的设计和简化的系统,它们最近获得了极大的关注,这使它们成为便携式应用的理想选择。本文采用数值模拟和田口分析相结合的方法,首次对空气呼吸式和传统pemfc进行了比较研究。针对每种类型的燃料电池,建立了综合的多物理场一维模型。结果表明,传统燃料电池的性能优于吸气式燃料电池,特别是在高电流密度下。这是由于传统燃料电池阴极侧的质量和传热系数明显更高,这也增强了其散热能力。田口分析根据对燃料电池性能的影响对具体设计参数进行排序,确定阴极GDL厚度是影响最大的。数值模型的参数化研究结果证实了这一排名和田口分析提出的因素的显著性。有趣的是,与传统的pemfc相比,吸气式pemfc的性能对阴极GDL孔隙度更敏感。这种增加的灵敏度主要是由于吸气式pemfc中更高的扩散限制和更低的氧质量传递系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis and optimization of performance of air-breathing and conventional PEM fuel cells
Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a critical part of the energy transition as they can be sustainably powered by hydrogen fuel. They have gained significant attention recently due to their compact design and simplified system, which makes them ideal for portable applications. This paper presents a first-of-its-kind comparative study of air-breathing and conventional PEMFCs, conducted using a combined approach of numerical modelling and Taguchi analysis. A comprehensive multiphysics one-dimensional model was developed for each type of fuel cell. The results show that the conventional fuel cell outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell, especially at high current densities. This is due to its significantly higher mass and heat transfer coefficients on the cathode side of the conventional fuel cell, which also enhances its heat dissipation. Taguchi analysis ranked specific design parameters by their impact on fuel cell performance, identifying cathode GDL thickness as the most influential. The results of the parametric study using numerical models confirm this ranking and the significance of the factors proposed by Taguchi analysis. Interestingly, the performance of air-breathing PEMFCs is more sensitive to cathode GDL porosity compared to conventional PEMFCs. This increased sensitivity is primarily due to higher diffusion limitations and a lower oxygen mass transport coefficient in air-breathing PEMFCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
期刊最新文献
Experimental and molecular simulation studies on Ignition, pyrolysis and thermal decomposition mechanism of Trimethylolethane trinitrate Tailoring high-performance graphite fibers by regulating n-heptane soluble fraction in mesophase pitch Poly(deep eutectic solvent)-based synthesis of hierarchically porous graphene aerogels for fuel desulfurization application Synergistic role of acetone and CuCl2 in promoting bio-oil production and denitrification during sludge thermal liquefaction Combustion characteristics of cross-jet micro-diffusion pilot nozzle of hydrogen-enriched syngas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1