基于数据的创伤后应激障碍和共存症状的循证治疗选择

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/jts.23133
Victoria Alicia Torres, Elizabeth Coe, Jalisa Jackson, Kiara Leonard, Jessica Rostockyj, Kira Swensen, Eric Meyer, Suzy Bird Gulliver, Stephanie Jones
{"title":"基于数据的创伤后应激障碍和共存症状的循证治疗选择","authors":"Victoria Alicia Torres,&nbsp;Elizabeth Coe,&nbsp;Jalisa Jackson,&nbsp;Kiara Leonard,&nbsp;Jessica Rostockyj,&nbsp;Kira Swensen,&nbsp;Eric Meyer,&nbsp;Suzy Bird Gulliver,&nbsp;Stephanie Jones","doi":"10.1002/jts.23133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with other disorders. Although there are several evidence-based treatments available for PTSD and co-occurring disorders, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP), limited findings clarify the use of baseline symptom data to help providers and patients choose among treatments. To address this, the current study examined baseline symptoms and treatment trajectories among 90 veterans and veteran family members with probable PTSD (based on PCL-5) receiving either trauma-focused (CPT, PE) or transdiagnostic (ACT, UP) treatment via telehealth, with the aim of assisting providers in recognizing patterns to inform data-driven treatment selection. Overall, there was no difference in the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms between transdiagnostic and trauma-focused treatments, relative risk (<i>RR</i>) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.63, 1.34]. When stratified by probable substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) status, the results revealed a pattern suggesting that transdiagnostic treatment may be more effective for reducing PTSD symptoms among individuals with probable co-occurring SUD and MDD, <i>RR</i> = 1.50, 95% CI [0.27, 8.34], whereas trauma-focused treatment may be more effective for those without probable co-occurring SUD or MDD, <i>RR</i> = 0.56, 95% CI [0.31, 1.00]. Studies with larger samples and randomization are needed to confirm patterns. This work could be extended by comparing outcomes from other treatments and by assessing functional outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 3","pages":"387-398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-informed selection of evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder and co-occurring symptoms\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Alicia Torres,&nbsp;Elizabeth Coe,&nbsp;Jalisa Jackson,&nbsp;Kiara Leonard,&nbsp;Jessica Rostockyj,&nbsp;Kira Swensen,&nbsp;Eric Meyer,&nbsp;Suzy Bird Gulliver,&nbsp;Stephanie Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.23133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with other disorders. Although there are several evidence-based treatments available for PTSD and co-occurring disorders, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP), limited findings clarify the use of baseline symptom data to help providers and patients choose among treatments. To address this, the current study examined baseline symptoms and treatment trajectories among 90 veterans and veteran family members with probable PTSD (based on PCL-5) receiving either trauma-focused (CPT, PE) or transdiagnostic (ACT, UP) treatment via telehealth, with the aim of assisting providers in recognizing patterns to inform data-driven treatment selection. Overall, there was no difference in the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms between transdiagnostic and trauma-focused treatments, relative risk (<i>RR</i>) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.63, 1.34]. When stratified by probable substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) status, the results revealed a pattern suggesting that transdiagnostic treatment may be more effective for reducing PTSD symptoms among individuals with probable co-occurring SUD and MDD, <i>RR</i> = 1.50, 95% CI [0.27, 8.34], whereas trauma-focused treatment may be more effective for those without probable co-occurring SUD or MDD, <i>RR</i> = 0.56, 95% CI [0.31, 1.00]. Studies with larger samples and randomization are needed to confirm patterns. This work could be extended by comparing outcomes from other treatments and by assessing functional outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"387-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)通常与其他疾病同时发生。尽管有几种基于证据的治疗方法可用于创伤后应激障碍和并发疾病,包括认知处理疗法(CPT)、长期暴露疗法(PE)、接受和承诺疗法(ACT)和情绪障碍跨诊断治疗的统一方案(UP),但有限的研究结果澄清了基线症状数据的使用,以帮助提供者和患者选择治疗方法。为了解决这个问题,目前的研究检查了90名退伍军人和退伍军人家庭成员的基线症状和治疗轨迹,这些退伍军人和退伍军人家庭成员可能患有创伤后应激障碍(基于PCL-5),通过远程医疗接受创伤集中(CPT, PE)或跨诊断(ACT, UP)治疗,目的是帮助提供者识别模式,为数据驱动的治疗选择提供信息。总体而言,经诊断治疗与创伤聚焦治疗在PTSD症状有临床意义改善的可能性上无差异,相对危险度(RR) = 0.92, 95%可信区间(CI)[0.63, 1.34]。当按可能的物质使用障碍(SUD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)状态进行分层时,结果显示了一种模式,表明跨诊断治疗可能对可能同时发生SUD和MDD的个体更有效,RR = 1.50, 95% CI[0.27, 8.34],而创伤集中治疗可能对没有可能同时发生SUD或MDD的个体更有效,RR = 0.56, 95% CI[0.31, 1.00]。需要更大样本和随机化的研究来确认模式。这项工作可以通过比较其他治疗方法的结果和评估创伤后生长和生活质量等功能结果来扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data-informed selection of evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder and co-occurring symptoms

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with other disorders. Although there are several evidence-based treatments available for PTSD and co-occurring disorders, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP), limited findings clarify the use of baseline symptom data to help providers and patients choose among treatments. To address this, the current study examined baseline symptoms and treatment trajectories among 90 veterans and veteran family members with probable PTSD (based on PCL-5) receiving either trauma-focused (CPT, PE) or transdiagnostic (ACT, UP) treatment via telehealth, with the aim of assisting providers in recognizing patterns to inform data-driven treatment selection. Overall, there was no difference in the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms between transdiagnostic and trauma-focused treatments, relative risk (RR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.63, 1.34]. When stratified by probable substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) status, the results revealed a pattern suggesting that transdiagnostic treatment may be more effective for reducing PTSD symptoms among individuals with probable co-occurring SUD and MDD, RR = 1.50, 95% CI [0.27, 8.34], whereas trauma-focused treatment may be more effective for those without probable co-occurring SUD or MDD, RR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.31, 1.00]. Studies with larger samples and randomization are needed to confirm patterns. This work could be extended by comparing outcomes from other treatments and by assessing functional outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
Medical trauma in context: Recognizing and addressing medically induced posttraumatic stress disorder in adults. Pilot trial of THRIVE: A peer-delivered sexual and intimate partner violence prevention program for women in substance use treatment. Effects on intrusive memories of playing Tetris with or without simultaneous and deliberate memory recall. Sex-specific associations between potentially traumatic events and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults. Trauma and posttraumatic stress among 2SLGBTQIA+ populations: Introduction to the special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1