彗星分析中DNA迁移水平略有增加:统计学意义是否等于生物学意义?

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1093/mutage/geaf004
Peter Møller, Andrew Collins, Adriana Rodriguez-Garraus, Sabine A S Langie, Roger Godschalk, Amaya Azqueta
{"title":"彗星分析中DNA迁移水平略有增加:统计学意义是否等于生物学意义?","authors":"Peter Møller, Andrew Collins, Adriana Rodriguez-Garraus, Sabine A S Langie, Roger Godschalk, Amaya Azqueta","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the comet assay, DNA damage is assessed by differences in DNA migration from gel-embedded nucleoids. Even a small difference in DNA migration between exposure groups can be statistically significant but may invite speculation about the biological significance of such slight increases in DNA migration. A small difference can be defined as a net difference of 1-2% Tail DNA, but background levels of DNA migration typically vary already more than 1-2% Tail DNA between studies. Here, we have used studies on ionizing radiation to assess the lowest detectable differences in DNA migration; variation in exposure-effect relationships; variation in central tendencies of DNA migration; unsystematic (residual) variation; and the actual number of lesions detectable with the comet assay. A total of 51 studies on ionizing radiation exposure in mammalian cells have been systematically reviewed, including results from ring-trial studies where the same batch of irradiated cells has been analysed in different laboratories. Ring-trial studies have shown that unsystematic variation is approximately 4% Tail DNA in studies on ionizing radiation. Studies on ionizing radiation in cell cultures have shown statistically significant effects when the net increase of DNA migration is 0.3-3.1% Tail DNA. Among those experiments, the ones with optimal assay conditions to detect low levels of DNA damage show statistically significant effects with doses of around 0.30 Gy, which corresponds to approximately 350 lesions per diploid cell. However, it has also been shown that the same dose of ionizing radiation can give rise to different levels of DNA migration (i.e. 0.7-7.8% Tail DNA per Gy) in different studies. In summary, the results show that even a small statistically significant difference in DNA migration has biological significance within the same experiment, but comparisons of DNA migration values between studies have limited biological implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18889,"journal":{"name":"Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slightly increased level of DNA migration in the comet assay: does statistical significance equal biological significance?\",\"authors\":\"Peter Møller, Andrew Collins, Adriana Rodriguez-Garraus, Sabine A S Langie, Roger Godschalk, Amaya Azqueta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mutage/geaf004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the comet assay, DNA damage is assessed by differences in DNA migration from gel-embedded nucleoids. Even a small difference in DNA migration between exposure groups can be statistically significant but may invite speculation about the biological significance of such slight increases in DNA migration. A small difference can be defined as a net difference of 1-2% Tail DNA, but background levels of DNA migration typically vary already more than 1-2% Tail DNA between studies. Here, we have used studies on ionizing radiation to assess the lowest detectable differences in DNA migration; variation in exposure-effect relationships; variation in central tendencies of DNA migration; unsystematic (residual) variation; and the actual number of lesions detectable with the comet assay. A total of 51 studies on ionizing radiation exposure in mammalian cells have been systematically reviewed, including results from ring-trial studies where the same batch of irradiated cells has been analysed in different laboratories. Ring-trial studies have shown that unsystematic variation is approximately 4% Tail DNA in studies on ionizing radiation. Studies on ionizing radiation in cell cultures have shown statistically significant effects when the net increase of DNA migration is 0.3-3.1% Tail DNA. Among those experiments, the ones with optimal assay conditions to detect low levels of DNA damage show statistically significant effects with doses of around 0.30 Gy, which corresponds to approximately 350 lesions per diploid cell. However, it has also been shown that the same dose of ionizing radiation can give rise to different levels of DNA migration (i.e. 0.7-7.8% Tail DNA per Gy) in different studies. In summary, the results show that even a small statistically significant difference in DNA migration has biological significance within the same experiment, but comparisons of DNA migration values between studies have limited biological implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaf004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaf004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在彗星试验中,DNA损伤是通过DNA从凝胶嵌入的类核迁移的差异来评估的。即使是暴露组之间DNA迁移的微小差异也可能具有统计学意义,但可能会引起人们对DNA迁移轻微增加的生物学意义的猜测。微小的差异可以定义为1-2%尾DNA的净差异,但DNA迁移的背景水平在研究之间的差异通常已经超过1-2%尾DNA。在这里,我们使用电离辐射研究来评估DNA迁移的最低可检测差异;暴露-效应关系的变异;DNA迁移中心趋势的变化;非系统(残余)变异;以及彗星试验检测到的病变的实际数量。已经系统地审查了51项关于哺乳动物细胞电离辐射暴露的研究,包括在不同实验室分析同一批辐照细胞的环形试验研究的结果。环形试验研究表明,在电离辐射研究中,非系统变异约占尾DNA的4%。对细胞培养中电离辐射的研究表明,当DNA迁移的净增加为0.3-3.1%尾DNA时,其影响具有统计学意义。在这些实验中,具有检测低水平DNA损伤的最佳分析条件的实验显示,在0.30 Gy左右的剂量下,具有统计学显著的效果,相当于每个二倍体细胞约350个损伤。然而,在不同的研究中也表明,相同剂量的电离辐射可引起不同水平的DNA迁移(即每Gy尾DNA迁移0.7-7.8%)。综上所述,研究结果表明,在同一实验中,即使DNA迁移的统计学差异很小,也具有生物学意义,但研究之间DNA迁移值的比较具有有限的生物学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slightly increased level of DNA migration in the comet assay: does statistical significance equal biological significance?

In the comet assay, DNA damage is assessed by differences in DNA migration from gel-embedded nucleoids. Even a small difference in DNA migration between exposure groups can be statistically significant but may invite speculation about the biological significance of such slight increases in DNA migration. A small difference can be defined as a net difference of 1-2% Tail DNA, but background levels of DNA migration typically vary already more than 1-2% Tail DNA between studies. Here, we have used studies on ionizing radiation to assess the lowest detectable differences in DNA migration; variation in exposure-effect relationships; variation in central tendencies of DNA migration; unsystematic (residual) variation; and the actual number of lesions detectable with the comet assay. A total of 51 studies on ionizing radiation exposure in mammalian cells have been systematically reviewed, including results from ring-trial studies where the same batch of irradiated cells has been analysed in different laboratories. Ring-trial studies have shown that unsystematic variation is approximately 4% Tail DNA in studies on ionizing radiation. Studies on ionizing radiation in cell cultures have shown statistically significant effects when the net increase of DNA migration is 0.3-3.1% Tail DNA. Among those experiments, the ones with optimal assay conditions to detect low levels of DNA damage show statistically significant effects with doses of around 0.30 Gy, which corresponds to approximately 350 lesions per diploid cell. However, it has also been shown that the same dose of ionizing radiation can give rise to different levels of DNA migration (i.e. 0.7-7.8% Tail DNA per Gy) in different studies. In summary, the results show that even a small statistically significant difference in DNA migration has biological significance within the same experiment, but comparisons of DNA migration values between studies have limited biological implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mutagenesis is an international multi-disciplinary journal designed to bring together research aimed at the identification, characterization and elucidation of the mechanisms of action of physical, chemical and biological agents capable of producing genetic change in living organisms and the study of the consequences of such changes.
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Cytogenotoxicity of Novel Tetrazole-Based Schiff Bases and Their Platinum (II) Complexes: A Detailed Analysis Using Chromosomal Aberration, Micronucleus, and Comet Assays. Ultra-Processed Foods and Diet Quality in Long COVID: Associations with Symptom Burden, DNA Damage, and Inflammation. Evaluating DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes: a promising biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in colorectal cancer. Mutagenicity of 5-hydroxycytosine in human cells. Assessment of mutagenic potential of puberulic acid contaminated in red yeast rice (beni-koji) health food supplements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1