INSIDE-OUT:介绍IDWeek活动的演讲者——观察无意识偏见。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf024
Jasmine R Marcelin, Rohan Khazanchi, Elizabeth Lyden, Kelly A Cawcutt, Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir, David R Ha, Narjust Florez, Ravina Kullar, Elizabeth H Ristagno
{"title":"INSIDE-OUT:介绍IDWeek活动的演讲者——观察无意识偏见。","authors":"Jasmine R Marcelin, Rohan Khazanchi, Elizabeth Lyden, Kelly A Cawcutt, Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir, David R Ha, Narjust Florez, Ravina Kullar, Elizabeth H Ristagno","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 (<i>P</i> = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age <40 years to 65.3% for age >60 years (<i>P</i> < .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, <i>P</i> = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 2","pages":"ofaf024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INSIDE-OUT: Introduction of Speakers at IDWeek Events-Observing for Unconscious Bias Over Time.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine R Marcelin, Rohan Khazanchi, Elizabeth Lyden, Kelly A Cawcutt, Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir, David R Ha, Narjust Florez, Ravina Kullar, Elizabeth H Ristagno\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 (<i>P</i> = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age <40 years to 65.3% for age >60 years (<i>P</i> < .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, <i>P</i> = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"ofaf024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专业学会,包括美国传染病学会,努力解决专业发展中的性别和种族不平等问题。微侵犯仍然是实现这些目标的持久和普遍的障碍。非专业演讲者介绍是基于种族和性别的微侵犯的一种表现,这在IDWeek之前没有被评估过。我们评估了7年来IDWeek上演讲者介绍的差异,其中包括2016年推出的正式性别平等倡议。方法:对2013 - 2019年录制的IDWeek演讲者介绍视频进行回顾性观察研究。训练有素的编码员回顾了演示视频档案,以评估非专业介绍的主要结果:当演讲者的专业头衔没有被用作第一个介绍时。我们使用描述性统计、Fisher精确检验、Cochrane-Armitage趋势检验和多变量逻辑回归来表征演讲者介绍与演讲年份、演讲者人口统计学和演讲者-主持人人口统计学一致性之间的关系。结果:在审查的1940个视频中,48.9%的IDWeek演讲者在2016年期间和之前接受了非专业的介绍,而2016年之后的演讲者比例为41.5% (P = 0.0013)。不同年龄段的演讲者进行专业介绍的频率呈线性增长趋势,60岁年龄段为47.1% (P < 0.0001)。白人审查员比医学背景不足的审查员更频繁地使用非专业介绍(47.7% vs 29.1%, P = 0.0014)。女性-男性演讲者-主持人组合有更多非专业的介绍(54.6%,P < .001)。结论:在一次全国医学专业会议上对演讲者介绍中的微侵犯进行的最大规模评估中,我们强调了随着时间的推移取得的一些进展,并有充分的机会进一步规范公平的演讲者介绍,特别是对于女性和初级演讲者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INSIDE-OUT: Introduction of Speakers at IDWeek Events-Observing for Unconscious Bias Over Time.

Background: Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance.

Results: Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 (P = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age <40 years to 65.3% for age >60 years (P < .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, P = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, P < .001).

Conclusions: In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Differentiated Service Delivery for HIV Treatment: A Combined Mathematical Modeling Study of Four African Settings. Is There Value in Performing Yearly Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection by Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Among Patients Living With HIV in Non-Endemic Settings? Timing of Bronchoscopy and Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Immunocompromised Host Pneumonia. Association of Diabetes Mellitus With a Shared Hyperinflammatory Immune Response in Patients With Melioidosis and Patients With Tuberculosis: An Observational Case-Control Study. Recalibration and Validation of a Risk Scoring Tool to Predict Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1