管理能量,塑造护理:通过联合生产研讨会从肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征成人的见解。

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.02.008
Eleanor J. Thornton , Lawrence D. Hayes PhD , Dawn S. Goodwin PhD , Nicholas Sculthorpe PhD , Yeliz Prior PhD , Nilihan E.M. Sanal-Hayes PhD
{"title":"管理能量,塑造护理:通过联合生产研讨会从肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征成人的见解。","authors":"Eleanor J. Thornton ,&nbsp;Lawrence D. Hayes PhD ,&nbsp;Dawn S. Goodwin PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Sculthorpe PhD ,&nbsp;Yeliz Prior PhD ,&nbsp;Nilihan E.M. Sanal-Hayes PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, debilitating condition characterized by severe fatigue that is not relieved by rest and is often exacerbated by physical or mental activity. A key challenge for individuals with ME/CFS is energy management and to date, the only recommended strategy is “activity pacing.” This approach involves balancing activity and rest to avoid overexertion and minimize the risk of symptom exacerbation, commonly known as “post-exertional malaise”. A recent systematic review highlighted significant shortcomings in activity pacing interventions for ME/CFS, noting that they lacked rigor, were brief, and did not follow guidelines or integrate recommended technology, limiting their relevance for modern energy management. To address these gaps, the present study aimed to explore ME/CFS patients’ and health practitioners’ perspectives on approaches to energy management, how their understanding of energy management has evolved over time, and their recommendations for future interventions concerning energy management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight individuals with ME/CFS participated in six 1-hour-long online co-production workshops with two researchers, with the option to provide input through written responses. Additionally, three health practitioners shared their perspectives via email. Thematic analysis of the data identified several key recommendations for improving ME/CFS care.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><div>Workshops highlighted the need for early support, healthcare provider training, and public education to combat stigma and misconceptions around ME/CFS. Participants emphasized patient collaboration, research-informed practices, rigorous research, multidisciplinary teams, and the integration of technologies like mHealth, along with a comprehensive approach including sleep, diet, and psychological support for better symptom management and activity pacing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":"138 6","pages":"Pages 1001-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Energy, and Shaping Care: Insights from Adults with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Through Co-Production Workshops\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor J. Thornton ,&nbsp;Lawrence D. Hayes PhD ,&nbsp;Dawn S. Goodwin PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Sculthorpe PhD ,&nbsp;Yeliz Prior PhD ,&nbsp;Nilihan E.M. Sanal-Hayes PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, debilitating condition characterized by severe fatigue that is not relieved by rest and is often exacerbated by physical or mental activity. A key challenge for individuals with ME/CFS is energy management and to date, the only recommended strategy is “activity pacing.” This approach involves balancing activity and rest to avoid overexertion and minimize the risk of symptom exacerbation, commonly known as “post-exertional malaise”. A recent systematic review highlighted significant shortcomings in activity pacing interventions for ME/CFS, noting that they lacked rigor, were brief, and did not follow guidelines or integrate recommended technology, limiting their relevance for modern energy management. To address these gaps, the present study aimed to explore ME/CFS patients’ and health practitioners’ perspectives on approaches to energy management, how their understanding of energy management has evolved over time, and their recommendations for future interventions concerning energy management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight individuals with ME/CFS participated in six 1-hour-long online co-production workshops with two researchers, with the option to provide input through written responses. Additionally, three health practitioners shared their perspectives via email. Thematic analysis of the data identified several key recommendations for improving ME/CFS care.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><div>Workshops highlighted the need for early support, healthcare provider training, and public education to combat stigma and misconceptions around ME/CFS. Participants emphasized patient collaboration, research-informed practices, rigorous research, multidisciplinary teams, and the integration of technologies like mHealth, along with a comprehensive approach including sleep, diet, and psychological support for better symptom management and activity pacing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"138 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1001-1009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934325000932\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934325000932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)是一种复杂的、使人衰弱的疾病,其特征是严重的疲劳,不能通过休息来缓解,并且经常因身体或精神活动而加剧。对于患有ME/CFS的个人来说,一个关键的挑战是能量管理,到目前为止,唯一推荐的策略是“活动节奏”。这种方法包括平衡活动和休息,以避免过度劳累,并尽量减少症状恶化的风险,通常被称为“运动后不适”(PEM)。最近的一项系统综述强调了ME/CFS活动起搏干预措施的重大缺陷,指出它们缺乏严严性,过于简短,没有遵循指南或整合推荐的技术,限制了它们与现代能量管理的相关性。为了解决这些差距,本研究旨在探讨ME/CFS患者和健康从业者对能量管理方法的看法,他们对能量管理的理解是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,以及他们对未来能量管理干预措施的建议。方法:8名ME/CFS患者与2名研究人员一起参加了6个时长1小时的在线合作制作研讨会,并可选择通过书面回复提供意见。此外,三位健康从业者通过电子邮件分享了他们的观点。数据的专题分析确定了改善ME/CFS护理的几项关键建议。结果和结论:研讨会强调了早期支持、医疗保健提供者培训和公众教育的必要性,以消除对ME/CFS的耻辱感和误解。与会者强调了患者协作、研究知情的实践、严谨的研究、多学科团队、移动健康等技术的整合,以及包括睡眠、饮食和心理支持在内的综合方法,以更好地管理症状和调节活动节奏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Energy, and Shaping Care: Insights from Adults with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Through Co-Production Workshops

Background

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, debilitating condition characterized by severe fatigue that is not relieved by rest and is often exacerbated by physical or mental activity. A key challenge for individuals with ME/CFS is energy management and to date, the only recommended strategy is “activity pacing.” This approach involves balancing activity and rest to avoid overexertion and minimize the risk of symptom exacerbation, commonly known as “post-exertional malaise”. A recent systematic review highlighted significant shortcomings in activity pacing interventions for ME/CFS, noting that they lacked rigor, were brief, and did not follow guidelines or integrate recommended technology, limiting their relevance for modern energy management. To address these gaps, the present study aimed to explore ME/CFS patients’ and health practitioners’ perspectives on approaches to energy management, how their understanding of energy management has evolved over time, and their recommendations for future interventions concerning energy management.

Methods

Eight individuals with ME/CFS participated in six 1-hour-long online co-production workshops with two researchers, with the option to provide input through written responses. Additionally, three health practitioners shared their perspectives via email. Thematic analysis of the data identified several key recommendations for improving ME/CFS care.

Results and Conclusions

Workshops highlighted the need for early support, healthcare provider training, and public education to combat stigma and misconceptions around ME/CFS. Participants emphasized patient collaboration, research-informed practices, rigorous research, multidisciplinary teams, and the integration of technologies like mHealth, along with a comprehensive approach including sleep, diet, and psychological support for better symptom management and activity pacing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
期刊最新文献
The wisdom of medical aphorisms, part 1 A milky mirage: When septic arthritis intersects with gout flare Updates for healthcare providers: Myths about acetaminophen Diphenhydramine overdose in an older adult with neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular comorbidities: A case report Painful oral ulcers in a septuagenarian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1