Mengjun Liu , Chengpang Hsiao , Wenxing Zhou , Yujie Qi , Zhangqi Lai , Lin Wang
{"title":"外踝支具对健康女性切割动作中下肢运动学和动力学的影响","authors":"Mengjun Liu , Chengpang Hsiao , Wenxing Zhou , Yujie Qi , Zhangqi Lai , Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To explore if lace-up ankle brace and hinged ankle brace affect the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs during a cutting maneuver.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty healthy females performed a 45° cutting maneuver with different ankle braces. Ground reaction force, lower-limb joint angles and moments were compared among different ankle braces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Wearing hinged ankle brace significantly increased maximal knee valgus angle than lace-up and no brace conditions (0.7° [p = 0.011] and 0.6° [p = 0.029], respectively). Wearing hinged and lace-up ankle braces significantly increased maximal knee internal rotation angle (1.58° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.30° [p = 0.020], respectively) and decreased maximal ankle inversion angle (3.04° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.76° [p = 0.013], respectively). A considerable difference in kinetics was observed only in the maximal ankle eversion moment, which was higher in the hinged condition than the lace-up (p = 0.010) or no brace (p = 0.023) condition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wearing an hinged or lace-up ankle brace may reduce the risk of ankle sprain in females during cutting maneuvers. Ankle brace appears to have upstream effects on the knee, which may have injury implication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 178-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females\",\"authors\":\"Mengjun Liu , Chengpang Hsiao , Wenxing Zhou , Yujie Qi , Zhangqi Lai , Lin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To explore if lace-up ankle brace and hinged ankle brace affect the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs during a cutting maneuver.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty healthy females performed a 45° cutting maneuver with different ankle braces. Ground reaction force, lower-limb joint angles and moments were compared among different ankle braces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Wearing hinged ankle brace significantly increased maximal knee valgus angle than lace-up and no brace conditions (0.7° [p = 0.011] and 0.6° [p = 0.029], respectively). Wearing hinged and lace-up ankle braces significantly increased maximal knee internal rotation angle (1.58° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.30° [p = 0.020], respectively) and decreased maximal ankle inversion angle (3.04° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.76° [p = 0.013], respectively). A considerable difference in kinetics was observed only in the maximal ankle eversion moment, which was higher in the hinged condition than the lace-up (p = 0.010) or no brace (p = 0.023) condition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wearing an hinged or lace-up ankle brace may reduce the risk of ankle sprain in females during cutting maneuvers. Ankle brace appears to have upstream effects on the knee, which may have injury implication.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 178-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000980\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females
Background
To explore if lace-up ankle brace and hinged ankle brace affect the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs during a cutting maneuver.
Methods
Twenty healthy females performed a 45° cutting maneuver with different ankle braces. Ground reaction force, lower-limb joint angles and moments were compared among different ankle braces.
Results
Wearing hinged ankle brace significantly increased maximal knee valgus angle than lace-up and no brace conditions (0.7° [p = 0.011] and 0.6° [p = 0.029], respectively). Wearing hinged and lace-up ankle braces significantly increased maximal knee internal rotation angle (1.58° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.30° [p = 0.020], respectively) and decreased maximal ankle inversion angle (3.04° [p ≤ 0.001] and 1.76° [p = 0.013], respectively). A considerable difference in kinetics was observed only in the maximal ankle eversion moment, which was higher in the hinged condition than the lace-up (p = 0.010) or no brace (p = 0.023) condition.
Conclusion
Wearing an hinged or lace-up ankle brace may reduce the risk of ankle sprain in females during cutting maneuvers. Ankle brace appears to have upstream effects on the knee, which may have injury implication.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.