受试者数量和试验次数对深度学习模型和可穿戴imu在降落过程中生物力学变量估计的影响

IF 4.3 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Sensors Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2024.3521896
Tao Sun;Tian Tan;Dongxuan Li;Bernd Markert;Peter B. Shull;Franz Bamer
{"title":"受试者数量和试验次数对深度学习模型和可穿戴imu在降落过程中生物力学变量估计的影响","authors":"Tao Sun;Tian Tan;Dongxuan Li;Bernd Markert;Peter B. Shull;Franz Bamer","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3521896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data diversity and quantity are crucial for training deep-learning models. However, the impact of dataset diversity and size on biomechanical variable estimation models has not been explicitly investigated during drop landings. This work investigates the impact of the number of subjects and the number of trials per subject on the performance of wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven deep-learning models for knee moment and ground reaction force estimation during drop-landing tasks. An investigation dataset with 16 subjects and 25 trials per subject was collected in a biomechanical laboratory. The impact of subject and trial quantification was explored under different model complexity and types, as well as data augmentation methods using the investigation dataset. The deep-learning models were implemented by a feature extractor and an estimator realized by several fully connected (FC) layers. The feature extractor was independently evaluated with FC neural networks, convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) model, and transformer model. Three transformation-based data augmentation methods were proposed and compared with the measured dataset (MD). The results showed that the minimum required number of subjects and trials for the models to achieve an estimation performance of 0.85 of R-squared, 0.4 body weight <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> body height of root mean square error (RMSE), and 0.1 of relative RMSE (rRMSE) is five subjects and five trials. Intriguingly, adding more subjects to the dataset improved the estimation performance while adding more trials did not. In addition, the proposed data augmentation can alleviate the data scarcity issue when the number of trials is small.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 4","pages":"7532-7543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Number of Subjects and Number of Trials on Biomechanical Variable Estimation via Deep-Learning Models and Wearable IMUs During Drop Landings\",\"authors\":\"Tao Sun;Tian Tan;Dongxuan Li;Bernd Markert;Peter B. Shull;Franz Bamer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3521896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data diversity and quantity are crucial for training deep-learning models. However, the impact of dataset diversity and size on biomechanical variable estimation models has not been explicitly investigated during drop landings. This work investigates the impact of the number of subjects and the number of trials per subject on the performance of wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven deep-learning models for knee moment and ground reaction force estimation during drop-landing tasks. An investigation dataset with 16 subjects and 25 trials per subject was collected in a biomechanical laboratory. The impact of subject and trial quantification was explored under different model complexity and types, as well as data augmentation methods using the investigation dataset. The deep-learning models were implemented by a feature extractor and an estimator realized by several fully connected (FC) layers. The feature extractor was independently evaluated with FC neural networks, convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) model, and transformer model. Three transformation-based data augmentation methods were proposed and compared with the measured dataset (MD). The results showed that the minimum required number of subjects and trials for the models to achieve an estimation performance of 0.85 of R-squared, 0.4 body weight <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> body height of root mean square error (RMSE), and 0.1 of relative RMSE (rRMSE) is five subjects and five trials. Intriguingly, adding more subjects to the dataset improved the estimation performance while adding more trials did not. In addition, the proposed data augmentation can alleviate the data scarcity issue when the number of trials is small.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"7532-7543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10834508/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10834508/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据的多样性和数量对于训练深度学习模型至关重要。然而,数据集多样性和大小对降落过程中生物力学变量估计模型的影响尚未得到明确研究。这项工作研究了受试者数量和每个受试者的试验次数对可穿戴惯性测量单元(IMU)驱动的深度学习模型的性能的影响,该模型用于在降落任务中估计膝关节力矩和地面反作用力。在生物力学实验室收集了16名受试者,每个受试者25次试验的调查数据集。利用调查数据集,探讨了不同模型复杂性和类型下受试者和试验量化的影响,以及数据增强方法。深度学习模型由特征提取器和由多个全连接层(FC)实现的估计器实现。采用FC神经网络、卷积神经网络(CNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)模型和变压器模型对特征提取器进行独立评估。提出了三种基于变换的数据增强方法,并与实测数据集(MD)进行了比较。结果表明,模型要达到r平方0.85、体重$ $ ×身高$ $均方根误差(RMSE) 0.4和相对RMSE (rRMSE) 0.1的估计性能,所需的最小受试者数和试验数为5名受试者和5次试验。有趣的是,向数据集中添加更多的受试者可以提高估计性能,而添加更多的试验则没有。此外,所提出的数据扩充可以缓解试验次数较少时的数据稀缺性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of Number of Subjects and Number of Trials on Biomechanical Variable Estimation via Deep-Learning Models and Wearable IMUs During Drop Landings
Data diversity and quantity are crucial for training deep-learning models. However, the impact of dataset diversity and size on biomechanical variable estimation models has not been explicitly investigated during drop landings. This work investigates the impact of the number of subjects and the number of trials per subject on the performance of wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven deep-learning models for knee moment and ground reaction force estimation during drop-landing tasks. An investigation dataset with 16 subjects and 25 trials per subject was collected in a biomechanical laboratory. The impact of subject and trial quantification was explored under different model complexity and types, as well as data augmentation methods using the investigation dataset. The deep-learning models were implemented by a feature extractor and an estimator realized by several fully connected (FC) layers. The feature extractor was independently evaluated with FC neural networks, convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) model, and transformer model. Three transformation-based data augmentation methods were proposed and compared with the measured dataset (MD). The results showed that the minimum required number of subjects and trials for the models to achieve an estimation performance of 0.85 of R-squared, 0.4 body weight $\times $ body height of root mean square error (RMSE), and 0.1 of relative RMSE (rRMSE) is five subjects and five trials. Intriguingly, adding more subjects to the dataset improved the estimation performance while adding more trials did not. In addition, the proposed data augmentation can alleviate the data scarcity issue when the number of trials is small.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
2058
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following: -Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation -Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication -Chemical and Gas Sensors -Microfluidics and Biosensors -Optical Sensors -Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others -Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors -Sensor Packaging -Sensor Networks -Sensor Applications -Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces -Actuators and Sensor Power Systems -Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting -Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data) -Sensors in Industrial Practice
期刊最新文献
Dynamic State Estimation of Integrated Energy Systems Based on SCKF Cost-Effective Digilog Chirp Thermal Wave Imaging System for Composite Subsurface Evaluation TS-ResCNN: Efficient Skeleton-Based Action Recognition for Edge IoT Sensor Systems Flexible Piezoelectric Tactile Sensing System for Intelligent Object Recognition A Multi-PPG Patch-Type Flexible Sensor System Recording Blood Pulse Timings on the Forearm as a Potential Indicator of Blood Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1