心理距离越大,创意选择越好:解释水平的中介作用。

IF 4.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3
Yiwen Zhang, Xiaowen Wang, An Zhang, Jiameng Zhou, Xiaobo Xu, Weiguo Pang
{"title":"心理距离越大,创意选择越好:解释水平的中介作用。","authors":"Yiwen Zhang, Xiaowen Wang, An Zhang, Jiameng Zhou, Xiaobo Xu, Weiguo Pang","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creativity research has often focused on idea generation rather than the crucial process of idea selection, which is essential for identifying practical and innovative solutions. Previous studies suggest that individuals frequently struggle with effectively selecting creative ideas, often performing no better than random chance. Psychological distance, defined as the subjective perception of how close or distant an event is, can facilitate decision-making and creative cognition, offering a potential mechanism for enhancing creative-idea selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research consists of four studies examining the effects of psychological distance on creative-idea selection and the mediating role of construal level in this relationship. Study 1a investigates the correlation between perceived psychological distance and idea-selection performance. Study 1b manipulates psychological distance to assess its effects on idea selection. Study 2 introduces the construal level as a mediating variable and tests a mediation model. Finally, Study 3 manipulates the construal level directly to confirm its causal relationship with creative-idea selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicate that greater psychological distance is associated with higher originality in the selected ideas and an increased selection of optimal ideas. However, psychological distance does not significantly impact the usefulness of the ideas. Study 1a found a positive correlation between psychological distance and the originality of selected ideas. Study 1b further confirmed that manipulating psychological distance enhances the originality of selected ideas and increases the rate of optimal idea selection. Study 2 demonstrated that construal level mediates the relationship between psychological distance and idea selection, particularly influencing originality. Study 3 confirmed the causal role of construal level, showing that a higher-level construal mindset leads to the selection of more original ideas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the importance of psychological distance and construal level in creative-idea selection. Increasing psychological distance can enhance individuals' ability to select more creative ideas by fostering higher-level construals. These findings offer practical implications for improving the creative selection processes in various contexts, suggesting that subtle cues (e.g., emphasizing future scenarios or abstract thinking) can help individuals make more effective creative choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater psychological distance, better creative-idea selection: the mediating role of construal level.\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Zhang, Xiaowen Wang, An Zhang, Jiameng Zhou, Xiaobo Xu, Weiguo Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creativity research has often focused on idea generation rather than the crucial process of idea selection, which is essential for identifying practical and innovative solutions. Previous studies suggest that individuals frequently struggle with effectively selecting creative ideas, often performing no better than random chance. Psychological distance, defined as the subjective perception of how close or distant an event is, can facilitate decision-making and creative cognition, offering a potential mechanism for enhancing creative-idea selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research consists of four studies examining the effects of psychological distance on creative-idea selection and the mediating role of construal level in this relationship. Study 1a investigates the correlation between perceived psychological distance and idea-selection performance. Study 1b manipulates psychological distance to assess its effects on idea selection. Study 2 introduces the construal level as a mediating variable and tests a mediation model. Finally, Study 3 manipulates the construal level directly to confirm its causal relationship with creative-idea selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicate that greater psychological distance is associated with higher originality in the selected ideas and an increased selection of optimal ideas. However, psychological distance does not significantly impact the usefulness of the ideas. Study 1a found a positive correlation between psychological distance and the originality of selected ideas. Study 1b further confirmed that manipulating psychological distance enhances the originality of selected ideas and increases the rate of optimal idea selection. Study 2 demonstrated that construal level mediates the relationship between psychological distance and idea selection, particularly influencing originality. Study 3 confirmed the causal role of construal level, showing that a higher-level construal mindset leads to the selection of more original ideas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the importance of psychological distance and construal level in creative-idea selection. Increasing psychological distance can enhance individuals' ability to select more creative ideas by fostering higher-level construals. These findings offer practical implications for improving the creative selection processes in various contexts, suggesting that subtle cues (e.g., emphasizing future scenarios or abstract thinking) can help individuals make more effective creative choices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创造力研究通常侧重于创意产生,而不是创意选择的关键过程,而创意选择对于确定实用和创新的解决方案至关重要。先前的研究表明,人们经常难以有效地选择有创意的想法,通常表现得并不比随机选择好。心理距离被定义为对事件远近的主观感知,可以促进决策和创造性认知,为增强创意选择提供了一种潜在的机制。方法:通过四项研究,考察心理距离对创意选择的影响以及解释水平在这一关系中的中介作用。研究1a探讨了感知心理距离与想法选择表现之间的关系。研究1b通过操纵心理距离来评估其对想法选择的影响。研究2引入解释水平作为中介变量,并检验中介模型。最后,研究3直接操纵解释水平,以证实其与创意想法选择的因果关系。结果:我们的研究结果表明,心理距离越大,选择的想法越新颖,选择的最佳想法也越多。然而,心理距离并不会显著影响想法的有用性。研究1a发现心理距离与所选想法的独创性之间存在正相关关系。研究1b进一步证实,操纵心理距离可以增强所选想法的独创性,提高最优想法的选择率。研究2表明,解释水平在心理距离与创意选择的关系中起中介作用,尤其是对创意的影响。研究3证实了解释水平的因果作用,表明更高水平的解释心态导致更多的原创想法的选择。结论:本研究强调心理距离和解释水平在创意选择中的重要性。增加心理距离可以通过培养更高层次的识解来提高个体选择更有创意的想法的能力。这些发现为在各种情况下改善创造性选择过程提供了实际意义,表明微妙的线索(例如,强调未来情景或抽象思维)可以帮助个人做出更有效的创造性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greater psychological distance, better creative-idea selection: the mediating role of construal level.

Background: Creativity research has often focused on idea generation rather than the crucial process of idea selection, which is essential for identifying practical and innovative solutions. Previous studies suggest that individuals frequently struggle with effectively selecting creative ideas, often performing no better than random chance. Psychological distance, defined as the subjective perception of how close or distant an event is, can facilitate decision-making and creative cognition, offering a potential mechanism for enhancing creative-idea selection.

Methods: The research consists of four studies examining the effects of psychological distance on creative-idea selection and the mediating role of construal level in this relationship. Study 1a investigates the correlation between perceived psychological distance and idea-selection performance. Study 1b manipulates psychological distance to assess its effects on idea selection. Study 2 introduces the construal level as a mediating variable and tests a mediation model. Finally, Study 3 manipulates the construal level directly to confirm its causal relationship with creative-idea selection.

Results: Our results indicate that greater psychological distance is associated with higher originality in the selected ideas and an increased selection of optimal ideas. However, psychological distance does not significantly impact the usefulness of the ideas. Study 1a found a positive correlation between psychological distance and the originality of selected ideas. Study 1b further confirmed that manipulating psychological distance enhances the originality of selected ideas and increases the rate of optimal idea selection. Study 2 demonstrated that construal level mediates the relationship between psychological distance and idea selection, particularly influencing originality. Study 3 confirmed the causal role of construal level, showing that a higher-level construal mindset leads to the selection of more original ideas.

Conclusions: This research underscores the importance of psychological distance and construal level in creative-idea selection. Increasing psychological distance can enhance individuals' ability to select more creative ideas by fostering higher-level construals. These findings offer practical implications for improving the creative selection processes in various contexts, suggesting that subtle cues (e.g., emphasizing future scenarios or abstract thinking) can help individuals make more effective creative choices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes toward bereavement support and associated factors in the Japanese population: a cross-sectional study. Association of motor skill competence, motivation, and physical activity among Chinese children aged 10-12 years. Big Five traits and cyberbullying severity as predictors of cyberbystander behavior among adults in the U.S. Hindi translation and validation of Ultra Brief peripartum Mental Health Screening Tool (UBPMHST). The effect of self-forgiveness on academic procrastination in first-year junior high school students: the roles of state anxiety and state hope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1