{"title":"Latitudinal patterns and climatic drivers of Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree distributions in forests of the Americas","authors":"Yi Jin, Hong Qian","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The biogeographic affinity of a lineage leaves imprint on its niche, and influences its distribution under biotic interchange between landmasses. Since the beginning of the Quaternary, North America (a remnant of Laurasia) and South America (a remnant of Gondwana) have been united, and triggered the Great American Biotic Interchange. Based on existing knowledge, we expect more Laurasian lineages to occur at higher latitudes, in colder or drier areas; and more Gondwanan lineages to reside at lower latitudes, in hotter and wetter areas of the Americas. Moreover, the tropical niche conservatism (TNC) hypothesis states that the tropical flora be most ancient. If so, then both younger Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages would occur in regions at colder and higher latitudes. Here, we examine the latitudinal patterns of species richness and mean family age of Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree lineages in 422 forest plots distributed across the Americas, and investigate the underlying continent and climatic drivers. We found opposite latitudinal and climatic patterns for species richness of Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages, the former declined towards lower latitudes and hotter climates, whereas the latter declined towards higher latitudes and colder climates. In particular, more pronounced climatic patterns for species richness of Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages were observed in North and South America, respectively. In addition, the mean family age of Laurasian lineages declined towards higher latitudes and colder climates, and for Gondwanan lineages it also decreased towards higher latitudes in South America, hence supporting the TNC hypothesis. We suggest Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree lineages in forests of the Americas exhibit diverged climate niche preferences, perhaps partly due to diversification of the former in extratropical climates in recent geological times.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Latitudinal patterns and climatic drivers of Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree distributions in forests of the Americas
The biogeographic affinity of a lineage leaves imprint on its niche, and influences its distribution under biotic interchange between landmasses. Since the beginning of the Quaternary, North America (a remnant of Laurasia) and South America (a remnant of Gondwana) have been united, and triggered the Great American Biotic Interchange. Based on existing knowledge, we expect more Laurasian lineages to occur at higher latitudes, in colder or drier areas; and more Gondwanan lineages to reside at lower latitudes, in hotter and wetter areas of the Americas. Moreover, the tropical niche conservatism (TNC) hypothesis states that the tropical flora be most ancient. If so, then both younger Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages would occur in regions at colder and higher latitudes. Here, we examine the latitudinal patterns of species richness and mean family age of Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree lineages in 422 forest plots distributed across the Americas, and investigate the underlying continent and climatic drivers. We found opposite latitudinal and climatic patterns for species richness of Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages, the former declined towards lower latitudes and hotter climates, whereas the latter declined towards higher latitudes and colder climates. In particular, more pronounced climatic patterns for species richness of Laurasian and Gondwanan lineages were observed in North and South America, respectively. In addition, the mean family age of Laurasian lineages declined towards higher latitudes and colder climates, and for Gondwanan lineages it also decreased towards higher latitudes in South America, hence supporting the TNC hypothesis. We suggest Laurasian and Gondwanan angiosperm tree lineages in forests of the Americas exhibit diverged climate niche preferences, perhaps partly due to diversification of the former in extratropical climates in recent geological times.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.