Kleanthi Kourtaki, Daniel Buchner, Philipp R. Martin, Katharine Thompson, Stefan B. Haderlein
{"title":"Influence of organophosphonates as alternative P-sources on bacterial transformation of glyphosate","authors":"Kleanthi Kourtaki, Daniel Buchner, Philipp R. Martin, Katharine Thompson, Stefan B. Haderlein","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glyphosate biotransformation under phosphorus (P)-limiting conditions has been demonstrated for numerous bacterial strains. However, besides glyphosate bacteria can utilize a broad spectrum of other biogenic and synthetic organophosphorus compounds (e.g., organophosphonates, OPs) as P-source. The ubiquity of OPs in the environment reduces the likelihood that bacteria will encounter conditions where glyphosate is the only P-containing compound. To study the impact of co-existing OPs on the biotransformation of glyphosate, we conducted batch cultivation experiments with the bacterial strains <em>Achromobacter insolitus</em> Kg 19 (<em>A</em>. Kg 19) and <em>Ochrobactrum pituitosum</em> GPr1-13 (<em>O</em>. GPr1-13) in which glyphosate and an additional OP were simultaneously provided as P-sources. Experiments with glyphosate and one additional monophosphonate (aminomethylphosphonate (AMPA), 2-aminoethylphosphonate (AEP), or phenylphosphonate (PPA)) showed that glyphosate was the least preferred P-source. Furthermore, the repeated supply of excess AMPA or AEP hindered the biotransformation of glyphosate. For strain <em>A</em>. Kg 19, AEP and AMPA threshold concentrations above which no glyphosate transformation occurred were approximately 40 and 120 μM, respectively. Conversely, in the presence of a synthetic diphosphonate (iminodi(methylene phosphonate) (IDMP) or 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate (HEDP)), strain <em>A</em>. Kg 19 preferred glyphosate as P-source. While IDMP was transformed after the depletion of glyphosate, HEDP concentration remained constant throughout the experiment and its presence retarded both cell growth and transformation of glyphosate. In light of the ubiquitous presence of AMPA and other OPs in the environment, our findings indicate that the presence of OPs may compromise the biotransformation potential of glyphosate, leading to lower transformation rates than those reported in previous studies.","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125872","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多细菌菌株已证明在磷(P)限制条件下草甘膦的生物转化。然而,除草甘膦外,细菌还可以利用其他多种生物源和合成有机磷化合物(如有机膦酸盐,OPs)作为磷源。OPs 在环境中的普遍存在降低了细菌遇到草甘膦是唯一含磷化合物的条件的可能性。为了研究同时存在的 OPs 对草甘膦生物转化的影响,我们用细菌菌株 Achromobacter insolitus Kg 19(A. Kg 19)和 Ochrobactrum pituitosum GPr1-13(O. GPr1-13)进行了批量培养实验,实验中同时提供草甘膦和另一种 OP 作为 P 源。草甘膦和另外一种单膦酸盐(氨甲基膦酸盐(AMPA)、2-氨基乙基膦酸盐(AEP)或苯基膦酸盐(PPA))的实验表明,草甘膦是最不受欢迎的钾源。此外,重复提供过量的 AMPA 或 AEP 会阻碍草甘膦的生物转化。对于菌株 A. Kg 19,AEP 和 AMPA 的阈值浓度分别约为 40 和 120 μM,超过这一浓度草甘膦就不会发生转化。相反,在合成二膦酸盐(亚氨基二亚甲基膦酸盐(IDMP)或 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate (HEDP))存在的情况下,菌株 A. Kg 19 更喜欢草甘膦作为 P 源。虽然 IDMP 在草甘膦耗尽后发生了转化,但 HEDP 的浓度在整个实验过程中保持不变,它的存在阻碍了细胞的生长和草甘膦的转化。鉴于 AMPA 和其他 OPs 在环境中无处不在,我们的研究结果表明,OPs 的存在可能会影响草甘膦的生物转化潜力,导致转化率低于以往研究的报告。
Influence of organophosphonates as alternative P-sources on bacterial transformation of glyphosate
Glyphosate biotransformation under phosphorus (P)-limiting conditions has been demonstrated for numerous bacterial strains. However, besides glyphosate bacteria can utilize a broad spectrum of other biogenic and synthetic organophosphorus compounds (e.g., organophosphonates, OPs) as P-source. The ubiquity of OPs in the environment reduces the likelihood that bacteria will encounter conditions where glyphosate is the only P-containing compound. To study the impact of co-existing OPs on the biotransformation of glyphosate, we conducted batch cultivation experiments with the bacterial strains Achromobacter insolitus Kg 19 (A. Kg 19) and Ochrobactrum pituitosum GPr1-13 (O. GPr1-13) in which glyphosate and an additional OP were simultaneously provided as P-sources. Experiments with glyphosate and one additional monophosphonate (aminomethylphosphonate (AMPA), 2-aminoethylphosphonate (AEP), or phenylphosphonate (PPA)) showed that glyphosate was the least preferred P-source. Furthermore, the repeated supply of excess AMPA or AEP hindered the biotransformation of glyphosate. For strain A. Kg 19, AEP and AMPA threshold concentrations above which no glyphosate transformation occurred were approximately 40 and 120 μM, respectively. Conversely, in the presence of a synthetic diphosphonate (iminodi(methylene phosphonate) (IDMP) or 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate (HEDP)), strain A. Kg 19 preferred glyphosate as P-source. While IDMP was transformed after the depletion of glyphosate, HEDP concentration remained constant throughout the experiment and its presence retarded both cell growth and transformation of glyphosate. In light of the ubiquitous presence of AMPA and other OPs in the environment, our findings indicate that the presence of OPs may compromise the biotransformation potential of glyphosate, leading to lower transformation rates than those reported in previous studies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Subject areas include, but are not limited to:
• Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies;
• Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change;
• Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest;
• New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.