马里农民田间棉花产量的驱动因素对顶部的反应

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Crop Protection Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107160
Daouda S. Maïga , Ahmadou Sow , Moribo Coulibaly , Idrissa Tereta , Romain Loison , Thierry Brévault
{"title":"马里农民田间棉花产量的驱动因素对顶部的反应","authors":"Daouda S. Maïga ,&nbsp;Ahmadou Sow ,&nbsp;Moribo Coulibaly ,&nbsp;Idrissa Tereta ,&nbsp;Romain Loison ,&nbsp;Thierry Brévault","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Manual topping of cotton plants, which involves cutting off the terminal bud at the top of the main stem, has agronomic benefits, such as reducing vegetative exuberance, ensuring earlier production, or increasing yield by producing more bolls per plant. This technique also offers a promising alternative to chemical control by depriving certain pests of resources and triggering the plant's natural defenses. In Mali, though on-station experiments showed that topping did not substantially increase seed cotton yield, many growers have already adopted this technique mainly due to increased production.</div><div>In the present study, a survey of a network of 200 pairs (topped vs. non-topped) of farmers' cotton plots was performed to verify this statement and to identify the local (cultivation practices and environment) and ecological factors (rainfall, landscape context) that modulate the response of cotton yield to topping. In farmers’ plots, cotton topping contributed to a 25% increase in the seed cotton yield. The yield response to topping increased with the earliness of planting, the cumulative rainfall received after topping, regardless of the planting date, the supply of manure, and the pressure of piercing-sucking insects, which topping significantly reduced. The integration of topping into cotton-growing systems should be associated with other levers to reduce the dependence on chemical inputs, and sociotechnical obstacles should be considered to stimulate the participatory design of new sustainable cotton production strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 107160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of cotton yield response to topping in farmers’ fields in Mali\",\"authors\":\"Daouda S. Maïga ,&nbsp;Ahmadou Sow ,&nbsp;Moribo Coulibaly ,&nbsp;Idrissa Tereta ,&nbsp;Romain Loison ,&nbsp;Thierry Brévault\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Manual topping of cotton plants, which involves cutting off the terminal bud at the top of the main stem, has agronomic benefits, such as reducing vegetative exuberance, ensuring earlier production, or increasing yield by producing more bolls per plant. This technique also offers a promising alternative to chemical control by depriving certain pests of resources and triggering the plant's natural defenses. In Mali, though on-station experiments showed that topping did not substantially increase seed cotton yield, many growers have already adopted this technique mainly due to increased production.</div><div>In the present study, a survey of a network of 200 pairs (topped vs. non-topped) of farmers' cotton plots was performed to verify this statement and to identify the local (cultivation practices and environment) and ecological factors (rainfall, landscape context) that modulate the response of cotton yield to topping. In farmers’ plots, cotton topping contributed to a 25% increase in the seed cotton yield. The yield response to topping increased with the earliness of planting, the cumulative rainfall received after topping, regardless of the planting date, the supply of manure, and the pressure of piercing-sucking insects, which topping significantly reduced. The integration of topping into cotton-growing systems should be associated with other levers to reduce the dependence on chemical inputs, and sociotechnical obstacles should be considered to stimulate the participatory design of new sustainable cotton production strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425000523\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425000523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工打顶是指将棉花主茎顶端的顶芽剪掉,这在农艺上有一定的好处,比如减少营养旺盛,确保提早生产,或者通过每株多结铃来提高产量。这项技术也提供了一个很有前途的替代化学控制,通过剥夺某些害虫的资源和触发植物的自然防御。在马里,虽然现场试验表明打顶并没有显著提高棉籽产量,但许多种植者已经采用了这种技术,主要原因是产量增加。在本研究中,通过对200对棉田(打顶与不打顶)的网络调查,验证了这一说法,并确定了调节棉花产量对打顶响应的当地(耕作方式和环境)和生态因素(降雨、景观环境)。在农民的地块上,棉花打顶使籽棉产量增加25%。产量对打顶的响应随种植时间的提前、打顶后的累积降雨量、肥料的供应和刺吸虫的压力而增加,打顶显著降低。将打顶纳入棉花种植系统应与其他手段相结合,以减少对化学投入的依赖,并应考虑社会技术障碍,以促进新的可持续棉花生产战略的参与性设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drivers of cotton yield response to topping in farmers’ fields in Mali
Manual topping of cotton plants, which involves cutting off the terminal bud at the top of the main stem, has agronomic benefits, such as reducing vegetative exuberance, ensuring earlier production, or increasing yield by producing more bolls per plant. This technique also offers a promising alternative to chemical control by depriving certain pests of resources and triggering the plant's natural defenses. In Mali, though on-station experiments showed that topping did not substantially increase seed cotton yield, many growers have already adopted this technique mainly due to increased production.
In the present study, a survey of a network of 200 pairs (topped vs. non-topped) of farmers' cotton plots was performed to verify this statement and to identify the local (cultivation practices and environment) and ecological factors (rainfall, landscape context) that modulate the response of cotton yield to topping. In farmers’ plots, cotton topping contributed to a 25% increase in the seed cotton yield. The yield response to topping increased with the earliness of planting, the cumulative rainfall received after topping, regardless of the planting date, the supply of manure, and the pressure of piercing-sucking insects, which topping significantly reduced. The integration of topping into cotton-growing systems should be associated with other levers to reduce the dependence on chemical inputs, and sociotechnical obstacles should be considered to stimulate the participatory design of new sustainable cotton production strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Farmer adoption and effectiveness of copper-reducing strategies in Swiss viticulture Knowledge of pesticide retailers about pests and pesticides: primary source of pesticide extension in subtropics of Jammu, India Weed stem dual-stage localization by crop exclusion: A case study on carrot fields Toxicity of insecticides from different classes and transcriptomic analysis of clothianidin response in Monolepta hieroglyphica adults Comparative evaluation of a fast in-situ droplet detector and water-sensitive paper for pesticide spray distribution assessment in crop protection operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1