农业部门的养老金规定——来自欧洲的教训

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103596
Hana Hlochova , Bridget McNally , Michael T. Hayden , Anne Kinsella
{"title":"农业部门的养老金规定——来自欧洲的教训","authors":"Hana Hlochova ,&nbsp;Bridget McNally ,&nbsp;Michael T. Hayden ,&nbsp;Anne Kinsella","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pension security for the self-employed within the EU has been improved by recent pension reforms, nevertheless gaps persist, and the self-employed remain a vulnerable group in this regard. The self-employed in Ireland overall have lower levels of pension in comparison to those in employment and self-employed farmers have the lowest pension cover with many not planning to ever retire. This is despite the fact that self-employed farmers predominantly begin their working life earlier and spend a longer time in employment than the employed. The objective of this study is to assess the design of the social security pension system for farmers in five countries which have bespoke social security pension systems for farmers, to identify gaps in the current Irish social security pension system for farmers and highlight the need internationally for a bespoke system for farmers. The five countries examined, (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Poland) are members of the European Network of Agricultural Protection Systems (ENASP) which focuses on a broad spectrum of social security issues. Retirement pensions is one of its key areas of interest and thus the pension systems of these five countries provide an important benchmark for international comparison. In the Irish context, the findings suggest that Ireland lags in terms of its social security pension system, as it applies to farmers. Reform is needed to ensure full social welfare pension coverage for this cohort to protect their financial welfare in retirement and to support the farm succession process. We suggest some practical solutions in this regard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103596"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pension provision in the farming sector – Lessons from Europe\",\"authors\":\"Hana Hlochova ,&nbsp;Bridget McNally ,&nbsp;Michael T. Hayden ,&nbsp;Anne Kinsella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pension security for the self-employed within the EU has been improved by recent pension reforms, nevertheless gaps persist, and the self-employed remain a vulnerable group in this regard. The self-employed in Ireland overall have lower levels of pension in comparison to those in employment and self-employed farmers have the lowest pension cover with many not planning to ever retire. This is despite the fact that self-employed farmers predominantly begin their working life earlier and spend a longer time in employment than the employed. The objective of this study is to assess the design of the social security pension system for farmers in five countries which have bespoke social security pension systems for farmers, to identify gaps in the current Irish social security pension system for farmers and highlight the need internationally for a bespoke system for farmers. The five countries examined, (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Poland) are members of the European Network of Agricultural Protection Systems (ENASP) which focuses on a broad spectrum of social security issues. Retirement pensions is one of its key areas of interest and thus the pension systems of these five countries provide an important benchmark for international comparison. In the Irish context, the findings suggest that Ireland lags in terms of its social security pension system, as it applies to farmers. Reform is needed to ensure full social welfare pension coverage for this cohort to protect their financial welfare in retirement and to support the farm succession process. We suggest some practical solutions in this regard.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000361\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的养老金改革改善了欧盟内部个体经营者的养老金保障,但差距仍然存在,个体经营者在这方面仍然是弱势群体。总体而言,爱尔兰的自雇者的养老金水平低于在职者,自雇农民的养老金覆盖率最低,许多人根本不打算退休。尽管事实上,自雇农民主要比被雇佣者更早开始工作生活,就业时间更长。本研究的目的是评估五个国家的农民社会保障养老金制度的设计,这些国家为农民定制了社会保障养老金制度,以确定当前爱尔兰农民社会保障养老金制度中的差距,并强调国际上对农民定制制度的需求。研究的五个国家(奥地利、芬兰、法国、德国和波兰)是欧洲农业保护系统网络(ENASP)的成员,该网络侧重于广泛的社会安全问题。退休养恤金是其主要关注的领域之一,因此这五个国家的养恤金制度为国际比较提供了重要的基准。在爱尔兰的背景下,调查结果表明,爱尔兰在社会保障养老金制度方面落后,因为它适用于农民。需要进行改革,以确保这一群体的社会福利养老金全面覆盖,以保护他们退休后的经济福利,并支持农场继承过程。在这方面,我们提出了一些切实可行的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pension provision in the farming sector – Lessons from Europe
Pension security for the self-employed within the EU has been improved by recent pension reforms, nevertheless gaps persist, and the self-employed remain a vulnerable group in this regard. The self-employed in Ireland overall have lower levels of pension in comparison to those in employment and self-employed farmers have the lowest pension cover with many not planning to ever retire. This is despite the fact that self-employed farmers predominantly begin their working life earlier and spend a longer time in employment than the employed. The objective of this study is to assess the design of the social security pension system for farmers in five countries which have bespoke social security pension systems for farmers, to identify gaps in the current Irish social security pension system for farmers and highlight the need internationally for a bespoke system for farmers. The five countries examined, (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Poland) are members of the European Network of Agricultural Protection Systems (ENASP) which focuses on a broad spectrum of social security issues. Retirement pensions is one of its key areas of interest and thus the pension systems of these five countries provide an important benchmark for international comparison. In the Irish context, the findings suggest that Ireland lags in terms of its social security pension system, as it applies to farmers. Reform is needed to ensure full social welfare pension coverage for this cohort to protect their financial welfare in retirement and to support the farm succession process. We suggest some practical solutions in this regard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Digital technologies and social inequalities in agriculture and rural contexts: a gap-oriented systematic mapping review How farmers’ engagement in tourism impacts their perceived food (in)security: Preliminary evidence from China Green development coalition: The new dynamics of rural environmental governance in the Jiangsu-Zhejiang border area of China Agrarian waqf and counter-dispossession in infrastructure-led development: The Suramadu development corridor, Indonesia Unpacking rural spatial shrinkage in metropolitan fringe of China: A cross-scale human-land relationship perspective in Chedong, Guangzhou
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1