{"title":"坐骨神经萎缩是慢性肢体缺血患者伤口愈合受损的危险因素。","authors":"Yutaka Matsubara MD, PhD, Tadashi Furuyama MD, PhD, Toshihiro Onohara MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) typically undergo revascularization as the standard treatment. However, some still require major amputations post-revascularization. Because revascularization is invasive and costly, avoiding it may benefit patients with low likelihoods of wound healing. The Global Vascular Guidelines suggest primary amputation for patients unsuited to revascularization. Although previous research has linked frailty to limb prognosis, skeletal and bone frailties impact survival rather than limb outcomes. This study examines the association between sciatic nerve atrophy and limb prognosis in patients with CLTI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center, retrospective study included patients with tissue loss CLTI who underwent successful revascularizations at Kyushu Medical Center (2015-2020). Sciatic nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured using computed tomography scans above the bifurcation of the tibial and peroneal nerves. The CSA cutoff value for predicting wound healing was established using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were grouped based on whether their CSA was larger (normal) or smaller (atrophy) than CSA cutoff value. Outcomes assessed included wound healing rates, amputation-free survival (AFS), and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 188 patients (226 limbs), the mean sciatic nerve CSA was 27.5 ± 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup>. A CSA cutoff of 23.6 mm<sup>2</sup> (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity = 0.85; specificity = 0.71) was identified. Patients were categorized into normal (n = 147) and atrophy (n = 79) groups. The atrophy group had higher rates of nonambulatory status (38% vs 23%; <em>P</em> = .029), ischemic heart disease (47% vs 28%; <em>P</em> = .008), cerebrovascular disease (50% vs 35%; <em>P</em> = .045), end-stage renal disease (55% vs 37%; <em>P</em> = .024), and lower serum albumin (3.3 ± 0.06 vs 3.6 ± 0.05; <em>P</em> = .001). Six-month wound healing rates were 87.3% in the normal group vs 27.3% in the atrophy group (<em>P</em> < .001). Three-year AFS was 59.3% in the normal group vs 20.0% in the atrophy group (<em>P</em> < .001), and 3-year OS was 71.3% vs 57.8% (<em>P</em> = .022). Factors associated with impaired wound healing included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; <em>P</em> = .045), low serum albumin (HR, 1.80; <em>P</em> = .001), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.75; <em>P</em> = .002), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.71; <em>P</em> = .002), and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.21; <em>P</em> < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age (HR, 1.02; <em>P</em> = .012) and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.08; <em>P</em> < .001) as independent risk factors for impaired wound healing after revascularizations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sciatic nerve atrophy correlates with poorer wound healing, AFS, and OS in patients with CLTI. Sciatic nerve assessment may guide decisions regarding limb salvage eligibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"82 1","pages":"Pages 186-192.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sciatic nerve atrophy as a risk factor for impaired wound healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia\",\"authors\":\"Yutaka Matsubara MD, PhD, Tadashi Furuyama MD, PhD, Toshihiro Onohara MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) typically undergo revascularization as the standard treatment. However, some still require major amputations post-revascularization. Because revascularization is invasive and costly, avoiding it may benefit patients with low likelihoods of wound healing. The Global Vascular Guidelines suggest primary amputation for patients unsuited to revascularization. Although previous research has linked frailty to limb prognosis, skeletal and bone frailties impact survival rather than limb outcomes. This study examines the association between sciatic nerve atrophy and limb prognosis in patients with CLTI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center, retrospective study included patients with tissue loss CLTI who underwent successful revascularizations at Kyushu Medical Center (2015-2020). Sciatic nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured using computed tomography scans above the bifurcation of the tibial and peroneal nerves. The CSA cutoff value for predicting wound healing was established using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were grouped based on whether their CSA was larger (normal) or smaller (atrophy) than CSA cutoff value. Outcomes assessed included wound healing rates, amputation-free survival (AFS), and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 188 patients (226 limbs), the mean sciatic nerve CSA was 27.5 ± 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup>. A CSA cutoff of 23.6 mm<sup>2</sup> (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity = 0.85; specificity = 0.71) was identified. Patients were categorized into normal (n = 147) and atrophy (n = 79) groups. The atrophy group had higher rates of nonambulatory status (38% vs 23%; <em>P</em> = .029), ischemic heart disease (47% vs 28%; <em>P</em> = .008), cerebrovascular disease (50% vs 35%; <em>P</em> = .045), end-stage renal disease (55% vs 37%; <em>P</em> = .024), and lower serum albumin (3.3 ± 0.06 vs 3.6 ± 0.05; <em>P</em> = .001). Six-month wound healing rates were 87.3% in the normal group vs 27.3% in the atrophy group (<em>P</em> < .001). Three-year AFS was 59.3% in the normal group vs 20.0% in the atrophy group (<em>P</em> < .001), and 3-year OS was 71.3% vs 57.8% (<em>P</em> = .022). Factors associated with impaired wound healing included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; <em>P</em> = .045), low serum albumin (HR, 1.80; <em>P</em> = .001), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.75; <em>P</em> = .002), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.71; <em>P</em> = .002), and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.21; <em>P</em> < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age (HR, 1.02; <em>P</em> = .012) and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.08; <em>P</em> < .001) as independent risk factors for impaired wound healing after revascularizations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sciatic nerve atrophy correlates with poorer wound healing, AFS, and OS in patients with CLTI. Sciatic nerve assessment may guide decisions regarding limb salvage eligibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-192.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521425003313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521425003313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者通常接受血运重建术作为标准治疗。然而,有些人在血运重建术后仍然需要进行大截肢。由于血运重建术是侵入性的和昂贵的,避免它可能有利于伤口愈合可能性低的患者。全球血管指南建议对不适合血管重建术的患者进行初次截肢。虽然之前的研究将虚弱与肢体预后联系起来,但骨骼和骨骼的脆弱影响的是生存而不是肢体的预后。本研究探讨坐骨神经萎缩与CLTI患者肢体预后的关系。方法:本单中心回顾性研究纳入了2015-2020年在九州医疗中心成功行血管重建术的组织丢失CLTI患者。坐骨神经横截面积(csa)测量使用CT扫描胫骨和腓神经分叉以上。利用受者工作特征分析,建立预测伤口愈合的CSA截止值。根据患者的CSA比CSA临界值大(正常)或小(萎缩)进行分组。评估的结果包括伤口愈合率、无截肢生存(AFS)和总生存(OS)。结果188例(226条肢体)患者坐骨神经CSA平均为27.5±0.7 mm2。CSA截止值23.6 mm2 (AUC(曲线下面积)= 0.81;灵敏度= 0.85;特异性= 0.71)。患者分为正常组(n = 147)和萎缩组(n = 79)。萎缩组的非活动状态(38% vs 23%, P = 0.029)、缺血性心脏病(47% vs 28%, P = 0.008)、脑血管疾病(50% vs 35%, P = 0.045)、终末期肾病(55% vs 37%, P = 0.024)和血清白蛋白(3.3±0.06 vs 3.6±0.05,P = 0.001)发生率较高。正常组6个月创面愈合率为87.3%,萎缩组为27.3% (P < 0.001)。正常组3年AFS为59.3%,萎缩组为20.0% (P < 0.001); 3年OS为71.3%,萎缩组为57.8% (P = 0.022)。与伤口愈合受损相关的因素包括年龄(HR = 1.01, P = 0.045)、低血清白蛋白(HR = 1.80, P = 0.001)、缺血性心脏病(HR = 1.75, P = 0.002)、终末期肾病(HR = 1.71, P = 0.002)和坐骨神经萎缩(HR = 5.21, P < 0.001)。多因素分析发现,年龄(HR = 1.02, P = 0.012)和坐骨神经萎缩(HR = 5.08, P < 0.001)是血运重建后伤口愈合受损的独立危险因素。结论:坐骨神经萎缩与CLTI患者较差的伤口愈合、AFS和OS相关。坐骨神经评估可指导残肢保留资格的决定。
Sciatic nerve atrophy as a risk factor for impaired wound healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia
Objective
Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) typically undergo revascularization as the standard treatment. However, some still require major amputations post-revascularization. Because revascularization is invasive and costly, avoiding it may benefit patients with low likelihoods of wound healing. The Global Vascular Guidelines suggest primary amputation for patients unsuited to revascularization. Although previous research has linked frailty to limb prognosis, skeletal and bone frailties impact survival rather than limb outcomes. This study examines the association between sciatic nerve atrophy and limb prognosis in patients with CLTI.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study included patients with tissue loss CLTI who underwent successful revascularizations at Kyushu Medical Center (2015-2020). Sciatic nerve cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured using computed tomography scans above the bifurcation of the tibial and peroneal nerves. The CSA cutoff value for predicting wound healing was established using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were grouped based on whether their CSA was larger (normal) or smaller (atrophy) than CSA cutoff value. Outcomes assessed included wound healing rates, amputation-free survival (AFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results
Among 188 patients (226 limbs), the mean sciatic nerve CSA was 27.5 ± 0.7 mm2. A CSA cutoff of 23.6 mm2 (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity = 0.85; specificity = 0.71) was identified. Patients were categorized into normal (n = 147) and atrophy (n = 79) groups. The atrophy group had higher rates of nonambulatory status (38% vs 23%; P = .029), ischemic heart disease (47% vs 28%; P = .008), cerebrovascular disease (50% vs 35%; P = .045), end-stage renal disease (55% vs 37%; P = .024), and lower serum albumin (3.3 ± 0.06 vs 3.6 ± 0.05; P = .001). Six-month wound healing rates were 87.3% in the normal group vs 27.3% in the atrophy group (P < .001). Three-year AFS was 59.3% in the normal group vs 20.0% in the atrophy group (P < .001), and 3-year OS was 71.3% vs 57.8% (P = .022). Factors associated with impaired wound healing included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; P = .045), low serum albumin (HR, 1.80; P = .001), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.75; P = .002), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.71; P = .002), and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.21; P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age (HR, 1.02; P = .012) and sciatic nerve atrophy (HR, 5.08; P < .001) as independent risk factors for impaired wound healing after revascularizations.
Conclusions
Sciatic nerve atrophy correlates with poorer wound healing, AFS, and OS in patients with CLTI. Sciatic nerve assessment may guide decisions regarding limb salvage eligibility.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.