“根据我的经验,我认为这对大多数人来说是一件消极的事情”:探索年轻英国女性反对英国菜单上卡路里政策的观点。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1177/13591053251318192
Maya Canzini, Jasmin Langdon-Daly
{"title":"“根据我的经验,我认为这对大多数人来说是一件消极的事情”:探索年轻英国女性反对英国菜单上卡路里政策的观点。","authors":"Maya Canzini, Jasmin Langdon-Daly","doi":"10.1177/13591053251318192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The compulsory inclusion of calorie information on menus has been health policy in the UK since 2022. Public opinion on the policy varies, with young women particularly likely to oppose and express concerns. This qualitative study explores the perspectives of young women with a negative opinion of the policy. Eight White British women (18-25 years) volunteered to take part in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceptions and experiences with calories on menus. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis developed three themes: (1) viewing calories fed their own unhealthy relationship with food; (2) calories don't tell you everything that matters about food; (3) negative emotional reactions are shaped by society's encouragement of the thin ideal. The women's negative opinions on the policy appeared heavily grounded in, and indicative of, their own negative emotional responses to viewing calorie information. They linked these responses to sociocultural meanings and ideals related to thinness, food choice and dieting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"3698-3713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'I think from my experience, it's a negative thing for most people': Exploring the perspectives of young British women opposed to the calories on menus policy in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Maya Canzini, Jasmin Langdon-Daly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591053251318192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The compulsory inclusion of calorie information on menus has been health policy in the UK since 2022. Public opinion on the policy varies, with young women particularly likely to oppose and express concerns. This qualitative study explores the perspectives of young women with a negative opinion of the policy. Eight White British women (18-25 years) volunteered to take part in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceptions and experiences with calories on menus. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis developed three themes: (1) viewing calories fed their own unhealthy relationship with food; (2) calories don't tell you everything that matters about food; (3) negative emotional reactions are shaped by society's encouragement of the thin ideal. The women's negative opinions on the policy appeared heavily grounded in, and indicative of, their own negative emotional responses to viewing calorie information. They linked these responses to sociocultural meanings and ideals related to thinness, food choice and dieting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3698-3713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251318192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251318192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2022年以来,强制性将卡路里信息列入菜单一直是英国的健康政策。公众对该政策的看法各不相同,年轻女性尤其可能反对并表达担忧。这项定性研究探讨了对该政策持负面看法的年轻女性的观点。八名英国白人女性(18-25岁)自愿参加了一项半结构化的访谈,探讨她们对菜单上卡路里的看法和经历。归纳反身主题分析发展出三个主题:(1)观察卡路里喂养自身与食物的不健康关系;(2)卡路里并不能告诉你食物的一切;(3)社会对苗条理想的鼓励塑造了消极的情绪反应。这些女性对这项政策的负面看法似乎在很大程度上是基于她们自己在看到卡路里信息时的负面情绪反应,并表明了这一点。他们将这些反应与社会文化意义和与瘦、食物选择和节食有关的理想联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'I think from my experience, it's a negative thing for most people': Exploring the perspectives of young British women opposed to the calories on menus policy in the UK.

The compulsory inclusion of calorie information on menus has been health policy in the UK since 2022. Public opinion on the policy varies, with young women particularly likely to oppose and express concerns. This qualitative study explores the perspectives of young women with a negative opinion of the policy. Eight White British women (18-25 years) volunteered to take part in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceptions and experiences with calories on menus. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis developed three themes: (1) viewing calories fed their own unhealthy relationship with food; (2) calories don't tell you everything that matters about food; (3) negative emotional reactions are shaped by society's encouragement of the thin ideal. The women's negative opinions on the policy appeared heavily grounded in, and indicative of, their own negative emotional responses to viewing calorie information. They linked these responses to sociocultural meanings and ideals related to thinness, food choice and dieting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Impact of public evaluation of the health security system on the trust in physicians: Mediating roles of satisfaction with medical care and perceptions of medical safety. 'Whatever happens, I am okay': A qualitative study exploring yoga practitioners' experiences with integrative medicine. Decreased health service use among migrants improves through an internal locus of control, especially in men. Investigating the suitability and readiness of COPD patients to engage with novel and non-pharmacological approaches to improve patient outcomes. The effects of moral distress on burnout and mental well-being across healthcare and care occupations: Do age and work resources matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1