教师对学术医疗中心健康的看法。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1177/10519815241308158
Anjali Gupta, Claire C Conley, Jesse Rice, Kendyll Poth, Kristi Graves
{"title":"教师对学术医疗中心健康的看法。","authors":"Anjali Gupta, Claire C Conley, Jesse Rice, Kendyll Poth, Kristi Graves","doi":"10.1177/10519815241308158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite national recommendations and decades of literature highlighting the importance of faculty wellness, gaps at academic medical centers remain. Multilevel wellness initiatives are necessary to create change and optimally support academic faculty.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions in the context of current resources at our academic medical center in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States.MethodsThe Georgetown University Medical Center Faculty Development Committee created a Wellness Task Force in response to a charge by leadership. The 11-member Task Force included faculty members from different disciplines: psychiatry, neurology, family medicine, pediatrics, nursing and oncology. Data collection occurred September 2021 to January 2022. Interviews and focus groups elicited faculty input on 1) factors that contribute to and detract from wellness and 2) strategies to enhance wellness within our academic medical center.ResultsFaculty described individual and organizational factors contributing to lack of wellness: challenges with balance; lack of connection, autonomy, resources and feeling valued; communication; culture; attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion; leadership; and workload. Proposed solutions included a comprehensive, centralized and consistent plan; culture change; incentives; increased autonomy, feelings of value, and resources.ConclusionsWellness as a budgetary priority and strategic initiative remains a critical goal for academic medical centers. Faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions underscore and add to national recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2359-2369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty perceptions of wellness at an academic medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Anjali Gupta, Claire C Conley, Jesse Rice, Kendyll Poth, Kristi Graves\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10519815241308158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDespite national recommendations and decades of literature highlighting the importance of faculty wellness, gaps at academic medical centers remain. Multilevel wellness initiatives are necessary to create change and optimally support academic faculty.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions in the context of current resources at our academic medical center in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States.MethodsThe Georgetown University Medical Center Faculty Development Committee created a Wellness Task Force in response to a charge by leadership. The 11-member Task Force included faculty members from different disciplines: psychiatry, neurology, family medicine, pediatrics, nursing and oncology. Data collection occurred September 2021 to January 2022. Interviews and focus groups elicited faculty input on 1) factors that contribute to and detract from wellness and 2) strategies to enhance wellness within our academic medical center.ResultsFaculty described individual and organizational factors contributing to lack of wellness: challenges with balance; lack of connection, autonomy, resources and feeling valued; communication; culture; attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion; leadership; and workload. Proposed solutions included a comprehensive, centralized and consistent plan; culture change; incentives; increased autonomy, feelings of value, and resources.ConclusionsWellness as a budgetary priority and strategic initiative remains a critical goal for academic medical centers. Faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions underscore and add to national recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2359-2369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241308158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241308158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管国家的建议和几十年的文献强调教师健康的重要性,差距在学术医疗中心仍然存在。多层次的健康倡议是必要的,以创造变化和最佳地支持学术教师。目的:本研究的目的是在美国中大西洋地区的学术医疗中心现有资源的背景下,检查教师对导致健康缺乏的因素的看法,并提出解决方案。方法:乔治城大学医学中心教师发展委员会根据领导的要求创建了一个健康工作组。这个由11名成员组成的工作组包括来自不同学科的教员:精神病学、神经病学、家庭医学、儿科、护理学和肿瘤学。数据收集时间为2021年9月至2022年1月。访谈和焦点小组引出了教师的意见:1)促进和损害健康的因素;2)在我们的学术医疗中心内提高健康的策略。结果:教师描述了导致缺乏健康的个人和组织因素:平衡的挑战;缺乏联系、自主权、资源和被重视感;沟通;文化;关注多样性、公平和包容;领导力;和工作负载。提出的解决办法包括全面、集中和一致的计划;文化的改变;激励机制;增加自主权,价值感和资源。结论:健康作为预算优先和战略举措仍然是学术医疗中心的关键目标。教师对导致缺乏健康的因素的看法和提出的解决方案强调并增加了国家建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Faculty perceptions of wellness at an academic medical center.

BackgroundDespite national recommendations and decades of literature highlighting the importance of faculty wellness, gaps at academic medical centers remain. Multilevel wellness initiatives are necessary to create change and optimally support academic faculty.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions in the context of current resources at our academic medical center in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States.MethodsThe Georgetown University Medical Center Faculty Development Committee created a Wellness Task Force in response to a charge by leadership. The 11-member Task Force included faculty members from different disciplines: psychiatry, neurology, family medicine, pediatrics, nursing and oncology. Data collection occurred September 2021 to January 2022. Interviews and focus groups elicited faculty input on 1) factors that contribute to and detract from wellness and 2) strategies to enhance wellness within our academic medical center.ResultsFaculty described individual and organizational factors contributing to lack of wellness: challenges with balance; lack of connection, autonomy, resources and feeling valued; communication; culture; attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion; leadership; and workload. Proposed solutions included a comprehensive, centralized and consistent plan; culture change; incentives; increased autonomy, feelings of value, and resources.ConclusionsWellness as a budgetary priority and strategic initiative remains a critical goal for academic medical centers. Faculty perceptions of factors contributing to lack of wellness and proposed solutions underscore and add to national recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Effects of mindfulness-based intervention on teachers' work stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Barriers and facilitators for return-to-work following post-COVID-19 condition: A scoping review. Emotional labor and emotional exhaustion among physical education teachers: The moderating role of social support. Computer use duration and body mass index as risk factors for arm, neck, and shoulder complaints among regular computer-using workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomechanical effects of an ergonomic belt on grip contact pressure during patient turning across BMI categories: A simulated patient repeated-measures study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1