Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan, Marita Hennessy
{"title":"工作场所对早期妊娠损失的支持:国际文献的范围综述。","authors":"Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan, Marita Hennessy","doi":"10.1177/10519815241305007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).ResultsFollowing title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (<i>n</i> = 16) followed by primary research (<i>n</i> = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.ConclusionsOur review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2021-2047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature.\",\"authors\":\"Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan, Marita Hennessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10519815241305007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDespite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).ResultsFollowing title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (<i>n</i> = 16) followed by primary research (<i>n</i> = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.ConclusionsOur review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2021-2047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241305007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241305007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature.
BackgroundDespite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).ResultsFollowing title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (n = 16) followed by primary research (n = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.ConclusionsOur review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.
期刊介绍:
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.