先天性嗅觉缺失和主观触觉功能:一项初步研究

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-04-27 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115487
Supreet Saluja , Anna Laura Tóth , Moa G. Peter , Robin Fondberg , Arnaud Tognetti , Johan N. Lundström
{"title":"先天性嗅觉缺失和主观触觉功能:一项初步研究","authors":"Supreet Saluja ,&nbsp;Anna Laura Tóth ,&nbsp;Moa G. Peter ,&nbsp;Robin Fondberg ,&nbsp;Arnaud Tognetti ,&nbsp;Johan N. Lundström","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anosmia, the complete loss of olfactory perception, has been associated with sensory compensation in non-chemical senses such as vision and hearing, but its relationship with tactile perception remains unclear. This study investigates whether isolated congenital anosmia (ICA)—a rare condition in which individuals are born without a sense of smell but are otherwise healthy—is linked to heightened self-reported tactile sensitivity compared to healthy controls. Drawing on sensory compensation theory and anecdotal evidence from related studies, we hypothesized that individuals with ICA would report increased tactile sensitivity, particularly in response to discomfort. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed individuals with ICA (n = 40) and healthy controls (n = 40), matched for sex and age, using standardized questionnaires and a specially developed questionnaire focused on discomfort related to materials, food textures, stickiness, and pressure. Contrary to our pre-registered hypothesis, the results revealed no significant differences in overall self-reported touch sensitivity between the groups. However, exploratory analysis indicated that individuals with ICA exhibit greater sensitivity to temperature sensations and to overall tactile discomfort, specifically in response to pressure and food textures, compared to controls. We propose that individuals with ICA may compensate for their olfactory loss through heightened sensitivity to certain tactile stimuli related to discomfort, as both touch and olfaction play overlapping roles in the detection of aversive stimuli. These exploratory findings underscore the need for further investigation into the sensory compensation mechanisms of olfaction on touch.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 115487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congenital anosmia and subjective tactile function: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Supreet Saluja ,&nbsp;Anna Laura Tóth ,&nbsp;Moa G. Peter ,&nbsp;Robin Fondberg ,&nbsp;Arnaud Tognetti ,&nbsp;Johan N. Lundström\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anosmia, the complete loss of olfactory perception, has been associated with sensory compensation in non-chemical senses such as vision and hearing, but its relationship with tactile perception remains unclear. This study investigates whether isolated congenital anosmia (ICA)—a rare condition in which individuals are born without a sense of smell but are otherwise healthy—is linked to heightened self-reported tactile sensitivity compared to healthy controls. Drawing on sensory compensation theory and anecdotal evidence from related studies, we hypothesized that individuals with ICA would report increased tactile sensitivity, particularly in response to discomfort. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed individuals with ICA (n = 40) and healthy controls (n = 40), matched for sex and age, using standardized questionnaires and a specially developed questionnaire focused on discomfort related to materials, food textures, stickiness, and pressure. Contrary to our pre-registered hypothesis, the results revealed no significant differences in overall self-reported touch sensitivity between the groups. However, exploratory analysis indicated that individuals with ICA exhibit greater sensitivity to temperature sensations and to overall tactile discomfort, specifically in response to pressure and food textures, compared to controls. We propose that individuals with ICA may compensate for their olfactory loss through heightened sensitivity to certain tactile stimuli related to discomfort, as both touch and olfaction play overlapping roles in the detection of aversive stimuli. These exploratory findings underscore the need for further investigation into the sensory compensation mechanisms of olfaction on touch.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"484 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

嗅觉缺失症是一种完全丧失嗅觉的疾病,它与视觉和听觉等非化学感官的感觉补偿有关,但与触觉的关系尚不清楚。这项研究调查了孤立的先天性嗅觉缺失症(ICA)——一种罕见的情况,其中个体出生时没有嗅觉,但其他方面都很健康——与健康对照组相比,是否与自我报告的触觉敏感度提高有关。根据感觉补偿理论和相关研究的轶事证据,我们假设ICA患者会报告触觉敏感性增加,特别是对不适的反应。为了验证这一假设,我们调查了患有ICA的个体(n = 40)和健康对照(n = 40),性别和年龄相匹配,使用标准化问卷和专门开发的问卷,重点关注与材料,食物质地,粘性和压力相关的不适。与我们预先登记的假设相反,结果显示各组之间总体自我报告的触摸灵敏度没有显着差异。然而,探索性分析表明,与对照组相比,ICA患者对温度感觉和整体触觉不适表现出更大的敏感性,特别是对压力和食物质地的反应。我们认为,ICA患者可能通过对某些与不适相关的触觉刺激的高度敏感性来补偿他们的嗅觉损失,因为触觉和嗅觉在检测厌恶刺激方面发挥着重叠的作用。这些探索性发现强调了进一步研究嗅觉对触觉的感觉补偿机制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Congenital anosmia and subjective tactile function: A pilot study
Anosmia, the complete loss of olfactory perception, has been associated with sensory compensation in non-chemical senses such as vision and hearing, but its relationship with tactile perception remains unclear. This study investigates whether isolated congenital anosmia (ICA)—a rare condition in which individuals are born without a sense of smell but are otherwise healthy—is linked to heightened self-reported tactile sensitivity compared to healthy controls. Drawing on sensory compensation theory and anecdotal evidence from related studies, we hypothesized that individuals with ICA would report increased tactile sensitivity, particularly in response to discomfort. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed individuals with ICA (n = 40) and healthy controls (n = 40), matched for sex and age, using standardized questionnaires and a specially developed questionnaire focused on discomfort related to materials, food textures, stickiness, and pressure. Contrary to our pre-registered hypothesis, the results revealed no significant differences in overall self-reported touch sensitivity between the groups. However, exploratory analysis indicated that individuals with ICA exhibit greater sensitivity to temperature sensations and to overall tactile discomfort, specifically in response to pressure and food textures, compared to controls. We propose that individuals with ICA may compensate for their olfactory loss through heightened sensitivity to certain tactile stimuli related to discomfort, as both touch and olfaction play overlapping roles in the detection of aversive stimuli. These exploratory findings underscore the need for further investigation into the sensory compensation mechanisms of olfaction on touch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation and anticipation mechanisms under unpredictable auditory perturbations: The role of perturbation type, stimulus complexity and cerebellar impairment Genetic association study using GWAS and Mendelian randomization to central nervous system comorbidities between multisite chronic pain and major depressive disorder Brain activation induced by pressure pain of healthy individuals versus amputees Neurotransmitter and neuromodulator imbalance in kisspeptin/GnRH regulation in rodent models of polycystic ovary syndrome and its implications for mental health disorders: A systematic review Aversive 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalization playback reveals differences in affective (dys)function following early life adversity in male and female juvenile rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1