Nicolas Girard , Ji-Youn Han , Ross A. Soo , Kaijun Wang , Wenxi Tang , Georgios F. Nikolaidis , Anastasios Tasoulas , Ifigeneia Barouma , JeanPierre Coaquira Castro , Zheyuan Yang , Tanushree Chaudhary , Lin Zhan
{"title":"tislelizumab 与其他抗 PD-(L)1 药物在局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌一线和后续治疗中的有效性和安全性比较:系统文献综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Nicolas Girard , Ji-Youn Han , Ross A. Soo , Kaijun Wang , Wenxi Tang , Georgios F. Nikolaidis , Anastasios Tasoulas , Ifigeneia Barouma , JeanPierre Coaquira Castro , Zheyuan Yang , Tanushree Chaudhary , Lin Zhan","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line (1L) squamous, 1L non-squamous with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50 %, and second- and subsequent lines (2L + ) settings via indirect treatment comparisons, following a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies investigating existing anti–programmed cell death protein-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The SLR was originally conducted in 2022 and updated in 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to assess the assumptions required for network <em>meta</em>-analysis (NMA) among therapies approved in the UK and European Union aligning with tislelizumab’s license. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs. Uncertainty was expressed in 95 % credible intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The SLR identified 277 total studies in 1L and 176 in 2L + NSCLC, with 23 and eight carried forward to their respective FAs. After the FA stage, 20 and eight studies qualified for the 1L and 2L + NMAs, respectively. Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was statistically significantly more favorable than most comparator treatments and ranked as best or second-best treatment overall for the following: PFS in 1L squamous NSCLC, OS/PFS in 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and OS/PFS/TRAEs in 2L + NSCLC of any histology. For the remaining analyses (i.e. OS/TRAEs in 1L squamous NSCLC), tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was comparable to other anti–PD-(L)1 therapies and combination therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy appears to be comparable to or more favorable than other regimens of anti–PD-(L)1 therapies or combination therapies in OS/PFS/TRAEs across patients with 1L squamous NSCLC, 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and 2L + NSCLC of any histology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab versus other anti–PD-(L)1 agents in first- and subsequent lines in locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Girard , Ji-Youn Han , Ross A. Soo , Kaijun Wang , Wenxi Tang , Georgios F. Nikolaidis , Anastasios Tasoulas , Ifigeneia Barouma , JeanPierre Coaquira Castro , Zheyuan Yang , Tanushree Chaudhary , Lin Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line (1L) squamous, 1L non-squamous with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50 %, and second- and subsequent lines (2L + ) settings via indirect treatment comparisons, following a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies investigating existing anti–programmed cell death protein-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The SLR was originally conducted in 2022 and updated in 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to assess the assumptions required for network <em>meta</em>-analysis (NMA) among therapies approved in the UK and European Union aligning with tislelizumab’s license. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs. Uncertainty was expressed in 95 % credible intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The SLR identified 277 total studies in 1L and 176 in 2L + NSCLC, with 23 and eight carried forward to their respective FAs. After the FA stage, 20 and eight studies qualified for the 1L and 2L + NMAs, respectively. Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was statistically significantly more favorable than most comparator treatments and ranked as best or second-best treatment overall for the following: PFS in 1L squamous NSCLC, OS/PFS in 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and OS/PFS/TRAEs in 2L + NSCLC of any histology. For the remaining analyses (i.e. OS/TRAEs in 1L squamous NSCLC), tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was comparable to other anti–PD-(L)1 therapies and combination therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy appears to be comparable to or more favorable than other regimens of anti–PD-(L)1 therapies or combination therapies in OS/PFS/TRAEs across patients with 1L squamous NSCLC, 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and 2L + NSCLC of any histology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500225000716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500225000716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab versus other anti–PD-(L)1 agents in first- and subsequent lines in locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis
Objectives
To estimate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line (1L) squamous, 1L non-squamous with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50 %, and second- and subsequent lines (2L + ) settings via indirect treatment comparisons, following a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies investigating existing anti–programmed cell death protein-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) therapies.
Methods
The SLR was originally conducted in 2022 and updated in 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to assess the assumptions required for network meta-analysis (NMA) among therapies approved in the UK and European Union aligning with tislelizumab’s license. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs. Uncertainty was expressed in 95 % credible intervals.
Results
The SLR identified 277 total studies in 1L and 176 in 2L + NSCLC, with 23 and eight carried forward to their respective FAs. After the FA stage, 20 and eight studies qualified for the 1L and 2L + NMAs, respectively. Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was statistically significantly more favorable than most comparator treatments and ranked as best or second-best treatment overall for the following: PFS in 1L squamous NSCLC, OS/PFS in 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and OS/PFS/TRAEs in 2L + NSCLC of any histology. For the remaining analyses (i.e. OS/TRAEs in 1L squamous NSCLC), tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was comparable to other anti–PD-(L)1 therapies and combination therapies.
Conclusions
Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy appears to be comparable to or more favorable than other regimens of anti–PD-(L)1 therapies or combination therapies in OS/PFS/TRAEs across patients with 1L squamous NSCLC, 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and 2L + NSCLC of any histology.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.