联合循环电厂各部件的高级火用分析与性能排序

IF 1 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1134/S0040601524700642
Uchenna G. Azubuike, Howard O. Njoku, Mkpamdi N. Eke, Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu
{"title":"联合循环电厂各部件的高级火用分析与性能排序","authors":"Uchenna G. Azubuike,&nbsp;Howard O. Njoku,&nbsp;Mkpamdi N. Eke,&nbsp;Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu","doi":"10.1134/S0040601524700642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"17 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant\",\"authors\":\"Uchenna G. Azubuike,&nbsp;Howard O. Njoku,&nbsp;Mkpamdi N. Eke,&nbsp;Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0040601524700642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"17 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于传统的火用分析并没有揭示由互连组件效率低下引起的热系统组件的火用破坏率,因此这种分析无法提供改善组件性能的实际潜力。本研究采用先进的火用分析方法对某联合循环燃气轮机电厂进行分析,通过评估内生和外生、可避免和不可避免的火用破坏率,解决了传统火用分析的不足。在整个工厂中,可避免的火用破坏率被发现是总火用破坏率的31%,这表明工厂有很大的改进潜力。大多数植物组分的能破坏率主要是内源的(95.2%),表明组分间相互作用的贡献有限。可避免的内源能破坏率占植株总能破坏率的28.4%,可避免的外源能破坏率占2.1%。工厂组件的组件级排名将工厂中的泵排在首位,而工厂级排名将最高优先级分配给燃烧室(CC)。一项关于CC工况对电厂性能影响的参数化研究表明,CC工况温度比CC工况压力对电厂火用破坏率的影响更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant

As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
The Effect the Choice of Turbulent Models Has on the Numerical Simulation Results for Condensation in Channels Identification of Fouling Profile for a Tube in the Presence of Turbulence Flow to Manage Energy Consumption in Heat Exchangers A Study of Immersed Liquid Metal Jet Flow through a Pipe in Longitudinal Magnetic Field The Influence of Erosion Wear on the Gas Dynamic Indicators, Strength, and Dynamic Characteristics of the T-35/59-1.3 Steam Turbine Last Stage Rotor Blades Theoretical Evaluation of Heat Transfer in a Tube with a Rough Wall in a Turbulent Flow Regime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1