审核文化对质量改进项目有效性的影响范围。

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00035
Carlos Frederico Pinto, Robin Jones, Francisco Gutierrez-Delgado, Julia Tomkins, Martins Fideles Santos Neto
{"title":"审核文化对质量改进项目有效性的影响范围。","authors":"Carlos Frederico Pinto, Robin Jones, Francisco Gutierrez-Delgado, Julia Tomkins, Martins Fideles Santos Neto","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cultural differences and their effect on international collaboration have been studied in several industries but only recently in health care. Understanding these differences can significantly influence the outcomes of ASCO's international co-operation initiatives focused on quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This manuscript is a scoping literature review examining how cultural differences influence the quality and safety of oncology care, and what strategies can be implemented to improve quality and outcomes in multicultural settings using cultural traits outlined by Hofstede's dimensions of culture. Power distance index (PDI; the ability to speak up without embarrassment) emerged in other industries as the most relevant trait affecting quality and team performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Few publications are available addressing such perspective, and the literature to date revealed that cultures with small PDI tend to perform better in health care safety and quality, and leadership behavior is a dominant feature in this condition. New techniques adopting psychological safety practices can mitigate cultural traits like PDI that hinder quality practices in oncology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors consider that psychological safety practices are a culturally sensitive strategy to ASCO's Quality Programs that can mitigate local cultural barriers and develop leadership behaviors that enable safety and quality strategies, and foster more effective international collaboration in ASCO Quality Programs in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Review of the Impact of Culture on the Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Frederico Pinto, Robin Jones, Francisco Gutierrez-Delgado, Julia Tomkins, Martins Fideles Santos Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO.24.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cultural differences and their effect on international collaboration have been studied in several industries but only recently in health care. Understanding these differences can significantly influence the outcomes of ASCO's international co-operation initiatives focused on quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This manuscript is a scoping literature review examining how cultural differences influence the quality and safety of oncology care, and what strategies can be implemented to improve quality and outcomes in multicultural settings using cultural traits outlined by Hofstede's dimensions of culture. Power distance index (PDI; the ability to speak up without embarrassment) emerged in other industries as the most relevant trait affecting quality and team performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Few publications are available addressing such perspective, and the literature to date revealed that cultures with small PDI tend to perform better in health care safety and quality, and leadership behavior is a dominant feature in this condition. New techniques adopting psychological safety practices can mitigate cultural traits like PDI that hinder quality practices in oncology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors consider that psychological safety practices are a culturally sensitive strategy to ASCO's Quality Programs that can mitigate local cultural barriers and develop leadership behaviors that enable safety and quality strategies, and foster more effective international collaboration in ASCO Quality Programs in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2400035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:文化差异及其对国际合作的影响已在若干行业进行了研究,但最近才在卫生保健领域进行了研究。了解这些差异可以显著影响ASCO注重质量改进的国际合作倡议的结果。方法:这篇论文是一篇范围广泛的文献综述,研究文化差异如何影响肿瘤护理的质量和安全性,以及在多元文化背景下,利用Hofstede文化维度概述的文化特征,可以实施哪些策略来提高质量和结果。权力距离指数;在其他行业,直言不讳而不感到尴尬的能力成为影响质量和团队绩效的最重要的特质。结果:很少有文献报道这一观点,迄今为止的文献显示,PDI小的文化往往在卫生保健安全和质量方面表现更好,领导行为是这种情况下的主导特征。采用心理安全实践的新技术可以减轻妨碍肿瘤质量实践的文化特征,如PDI。结论:作者认为心理安全实践是ASCO质量计划的文化敏感策略,可以减轻当地文化障碍,培养领导行为,实现安全和质量战略,并促进未来ASCO质量计划中更有效的国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scoping Review of the Impact of Culture on the Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Programs.

Purpose: Cultural differences and their effect on international collaboration have been studied in several industries but only recently in health care. Understanding these differences can significantly influence the outcomes of ASCO's international co-operation initiatives focused on quality improvement.

Methods: This manuscript is a scoping literature review examining how cultural differences influence the quality and safety of oncology care, and what strategies can be implemented to improve quality and outcomes in multicultural settings using cultural traits outlined by Hofstede's dimensions of culture. Power distance index (PDI; the ability to speak up without embarrassment) emerged in other industries as the most relevant trait affecting quality and team performance.

Results: Few publications are available addressing such perspective, and the literature to date revealed that cultures with small PDI tend to perform better in health care safety and quality, and leadership behavior is a dominant feature in this condition. New techniques adopting psychological safety practices can mitigate cultural traits like PDI that hinder quality practices in oncology.

Conclusion: The authors consider that psychological safety practices are a culturally sensitive strategy to ASCO's Quality Programs that can mitigate local cultural barriers and develop leadership behaviors that enable safety and quality strategies, and foster more effective international collaboration in ASCO Quality Programs in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding Childhood Cancer Survivorship: A Qualitative Study on Global Care Approaches. Current Access to Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing and Targeted Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Brazil: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey (LACOG 1224-GBOT). Landscape Assessment to Characterize Baseline Access and Multilevel Barriers to IMProve Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell CD19 Therapy for Pediatric B-ALL (IMPACT study) Across Europe. Cessation of Betel Quid Chewing, Smoking, and Alcohol Drinking and Risk of Oral Precancer and Oral Cancer. Assessing Willingness and Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation Among Patients With Cancer in Post-Conflict Syria: A Mixed-Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1