跨专业团队培训:从学习者那里学习在线与面对面的环境。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001772
Allison Shorten, Peter Bosworth, Shelly Camp, David House, William Somerall, Penni Watts, Tera Webb, Brett Shorten
{"title":"跨专业团队培训:从学习者那里学习在线与面对面的环境。","authors":"Allison Shorten, Peter Bosworth, Shelly Camp, David House, William Somerall, Penni Watts, Tera Webb, Brett Shorten","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional team training (IPTT) prepares students from health care professions for team-based care. Evaluating different learning environments to inform decisions about delivery format is timely and important.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare in-person and online IPTT learner outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Undergraduate and graduate students (n = 866) from 11 professions participated. Using retrospective pre-/post-methodology, 20 item Interprofessional Collaboration Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) scores were compared, and qualitative responses analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ICCAS scores improved for in-person and online delivery (P < .0001) with large effect sizes (Cohen's D = 0.94-1.86). In-person delivery resulted in greatest improvement (P = .038), offset by online logistical benefits. Qualitative themes highlighted impact on learning, importance of facilitator competence, and setting expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPTT achieved learning consistent with competency development. Advantages from in-person delivery should be weighed against online logistical advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":"50 2","pages":"84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional Team Training: Learning From Learners About Online Versus In-Person Environments.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Shorten, Peter Bosworth, Shelly Camp, David House, William Somerall, Penni Watts, Tera Webb, Brett Shorten\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional team training (IPTT) prepares students from health care professions for team-based care. Evaluating different learning environments to inform decisions about delivery format is timely and important.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare in-person and online IPTT learner outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Undergraduate and graduate students (n = 866) from 11 professions participated. Using retrospective pre-/post-methodology, 20 item Interprofessional Collaboration Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) scores were compared, and qualitative responses analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ICCAS scores improved for in-person and online delivery (P < .0001) with large effect sizes (Cohen's D = 0.94-1.86). In-person delivery resulted in greatest improvement (P = .038), offset by online logistical benefits. Qualitative themes highlighted impact on learning, importance of facilitator competence, and setting expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPTT achieved learning consistent with competency development. Advantages from in-person delivery should be weighed against online logistical advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"84-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001772\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跨专业团队培训(IPTT)为卫生保健专业的学生提供团队护理。对不同的学习环境进行评估以决定教学形式是及时和重要的。目的:比较面对面和在线IPTT学习者的结果。方法:来自11个专业的本科生和研究生共866名。采用回顾性的前/后方法,比较了20项跨专业协作能力素养调查(ICCAS)得分,并分析了定性反应。结果:现场授课和在线授课的ICCAS平均分均有所提高(P)。结论:IPTT实现了与能力发展相一致的学习。应该权衡亲自送货的优势与在线物流的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interprofessional Team Training: Learning From Learners About Online Versus In-Person Environments.

Background: Interprofessional team training (IPTT) prepares students from health care professions for team-based care. Evaluating different learning environments to inform decisions about delivery format is timely and important.

Purpose: To compare in-person and online IPTT learner outcomes.

Method: Undergraduate and graduate students (n = 866) from 11 professions participated. Using retrospective pre-/post-methodology, 20 item Interprofessional Collaboration Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) scores were compared, and qualitative responses analyzed.

Results: Mean ICCAS scores improved for in-person and online delivery (P < .0001) with large effect sizes (Cohen's D = 0.94-1.86). In-person delivery resulted in greatest improvement (P = .038), offset by online logistical benefits. Qualitative themes highlighted impact on learning, importance of facilitator competence, and setting expectations.

Conclusion: IPTT achieved learning consistent with competency development. Advantages from in-person delivery should be weighed against online logistical advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Title of Your Article Matters: Here's Why. Mediating Roles of General Self-Efficacy and Academic Emotions in the Relationship Between Technology-Enhanced Learning and Dropout Intention: Implications for Nurse Educators. Students Teaching Students: A Peer-Led Open Skills Lab Model in Nursing Education. Two-Minute Policy Pitch: A Micro-Simulation to Build Nurses' Political Competency. Setting the Tone Early: A Structured Orientation Strategy to Support Prelicensure Nursing Student Success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1