医学科研论文IMRD部分名词短语复杂度的历时变化(1970-2020)

IF 3.4 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101488
Fan Pan, Ming Nie
{"title":"医学科研论文IMRD部分名词短语复杂度的历时变化(1970-2020)","authors":"Fan Pan,&nbsp;Ming Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the growing interest in noun phrase (NP) complexity in academic writing, it remains unknown how NP complexity has evolved in IMRD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) sections within research articles (RAs). Exploring the evolution of NP complexity across sections can not only complement previous diachronic findings on whole RAs, but also enhance our dynamic understanding of the evolving linguistic correlates of IMRD sections with distinct communicative functions. This study investigated the diachronic changes in the use of nine NP complexity features (i.e., noun modifiers) across IMRD sections in a corpus of 480 medical RAs spanning 50 years (1970–2020) at 10-year intervals. Using Pearson correlation tests and two-way ANOVAs, we tracked the changing patterns of each feature and compared those patterns across IMRD sections. Findings showed an upward trend in phrasal NP complexity features in all the sections. Additionally, the cross-sectional comparisons revealed a two-way distinction, in which Introduction/Discussion sections consistently applied a wider range and a larger number of NP complexity features than Methods/Results sections. The observed diachronic changes were explained in relation to the evolving characteristics of the IMRD sections through a text-linguistic analysis. This study may provide useful implications for English for Medical Purposes pedagogy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diachronic change of noun phrase complexity in the IMRD sections of medical research articles (1970–2020)\",\"authors\":\"Fan Pan,&nbsp;Ming Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the growing interest in noun phrase (NP) complexity in academic writing, it remains unknown how NP complexity has evolved in IMRD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) sections within research articles (RAs). Exploring the evolution of NP complexity across sections can not only complement previous diachronic findings on whole RAs, but also enhance our dynamic understanding of the evolving linguistic correlates of IMRD sections with distinct communicative functions. This study investigated the diachronic changes in the use of nine NP complexity features (i.e., noun modifiers) across IMRD sections in a corpus of 480 medical RAs spanning 50 years (1970–2020) at 10-year intervals. Using Pearson correlation tests and two-way ANOVAs, we tracked the changing patterns of each feature and compared those patterns across IMRD sections. Findings showed an upward trend in phrasal NP complexity features in all the sections. Additionally, the cross-sectional comparisons revealed a two-way distinction, in which Introduction/Discussion sections consistently applied a wider range and a larger number of NP complexity features than Methods/Results sections. The observed diachronic changes were explained in relation to the evolving characteristics of the IMRD sections through a text-linguistic analysis. This study may provide useful implications for English for Medical Purposes pedagogy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们对学术写作中的名词短语(NP)复杂性越来越感兴趣,但在研究文章(RAs)的IMRD(引言、方法、结果、讨论)部分中,NP复杂性是如何演变的仍然未知。探索跨语段NP复杂性的演变不仅可以补充以往关于整个语段的历时性研究结果,而且可以增强我们对具有不同交际功能的语段语言相关因素演变的动态理解。本研究调查了跨越50年(1970-2020)的480个医学RAs语料库中9个NP复杂性特征(即名词修饰语)在IMRD部分中使用的历时变化。使用Pearson相关检验和双向方差分析,我们跟踪了每个特征的变化模式,并比较了IMRD各部分的模式。结果表明,各章节的短语NP复杂度特征均呈上升趋势。此外,横断面比较揭示了双向区别,其中介绍/讨论部分始终比方法/结果部分应用更广泛和更多的NP复杂性特征。观察到的历时变化通过文本语言学分析解释了与IMRD部分演变特征有关的变化。本研究可为医学英语教学提供有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diachronic change of noun phrase complexity in the IMRD sections of medical research articles (1970–2020)
Despite the growing interest in noun phrase (NP) complexity in academic writing, it remains unknown how NP complexity has evolved in IMRD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) sections within research articles (RAs). Exploring the evolution of NP complexity across sections can not only complement previous diachronic findings on whole RAs, but also enhance our dynamic understanding of the evolving linguistic correlates of IMRD sections with distinct communicative functions. This study investigated the diachronic changes in the use of nine NP complexity features (i.e., noun modifiers) across IMRD sections in a corpus of 480 medical RAs spanning 50 years (1970–2020) at 10-year intervals. Using Pearson correlation tests and two-way ANOVAs, we tracked the changing patterns of each feature and compared those patterns across IMRD sections. Findings showed an upward trend in phrasal NP complexity features in all the sections. Additionally, the cross-sectional comparisons revealed a two-way distinction, in which Introduction/Discussion sections consistently applied a wider range and a larger number of NP complexity features than Methods/Results sections. The observed diachronic changes were explained in relation to the evolving characteristics of the IMRD sections through a text-linguistic analysis. This study may provide useful implications for English for Medical Purposes pedagogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
期刊最新文献
Using AI-driven interventions in EAP classes: a mixed-method study on motivation and learning outcomes Epistemic verb complementation in research articles: A corpus-based approach to the verb suggest in two disciplines Measuring the social and engaged path to AI assessment acceptance in online EMI: Evidence from a SEM study Economies of academic writing for multilingual international students Exploring generative AI assisted-EFL academic writing: An activity theory perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1