通过与初级保健提供者合作提高儿童癌症生存护理依从性的多层次干预的设计和方法:BRIDGES随机对照试验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2025.107859
Wilhelmenia L. Ross , Yaiomy Santiago-Rivera , Ming T. Tan , Megan M. Roy , Stacy Bryant , Burton E. Appel , Jacqueline Casillas , Jenna Demedis , Andrew B. Smitherman , Leora I. Horwitz , Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza , Jason A. Mendoza , Sheila J. Santacroce , Nina S. Kadan-Lottick
{"title":"通过与初级保健提供者合作提高儿童癌症生存护理依从性的多层次干预的设计和方法:BRIDGES随机对照试验。","authors":"Wilhelmenia L. Ross ,&nbsp;Yaiomy Santiago-Rivera ,&nbsp;Ming T. Tan ,&nbsp;Megan M. Roy ,&nbsp;Stacy Bryant ,&nbsp;Burton E. Appel ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Casillas ,&nbsp;Jenna Demedis ,&nbsp;Andrew B. Smitherman ,&nbsp;Leora I. Horwitz ,&nbsp;Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza ,&nbsp;Jason A. Mendoza ,&nbsp;Sheila J. Santacroce ,&nbsp;Nina S. Kadan-Lottick","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite heightened risk of chronic health conditions, &lt;20 % of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) receive guideline-recommended surveillance for late effects. Barriers include avoidance of reminders, lack of knowledge, and costs. The goal of the BRIDGES Study is to evaluate the effects of a multi-level, remote intervention on adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance among CCS by partnering with primary care providers (PCPs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This ongoing study is a multi-site, two-arm, prospective, parallel design, 1:1 randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (<em>N</em> = 240; <em>n</em> = 120/group). Eligibility criteria are: cancer diagnosis at age &lt; 21 years, 2.0–4.0 years post-cancer therapy, and no previous specialty survivorship clinic care. The intervention includes: 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with a cancer center nurse, including discussion of patient's individualized survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) ongoing patient-tailored health education within the electronic health record's patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone call between the cancer center nurse and PCP, including discussion of patient's SCP, and 4) an in-person PCP visit for survivorship care. Patients randomized to the comparison group are contacted to schedule an in-person visit at their cancer center-based survivorship clinic. Adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance tests (primary outcome) is assessed at 1-year post-randomization (primary follow-up time point) and 2-years post-randomization (for durability). Patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation; PCP knowledge and self-efficacy; and process outcomes are also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Models of survivorship care that overcome existing barriers are needed. If efficacious, this scalable, remote intervention would be a valuable strategy to address barriers and bridge gaps in care to reach more CCS.</div><div><strong>Clinical Trial Registration:</strong> <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: <span><span>NCT05448560</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 107859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and methods of a multi-level intervention to improve adherence to childhood cancer survivorship care by partnering with primary care providers: The BRIDGES randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Wilhelmenia L. Ross ,&nbsp;Yaiomy Santiago-Rivera ,&nbsp;Ming T. Tan ,&nbsp;Megan M. Roy ,&nbsp;Stacy Bryant ,&nbsp;Burton E. Appel ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Casillas ,&nbsp;Jenna Demedis ,&nbsp;Andrew B. Smitherman ,&nbsp;Leora I. Horwitz ,&nbsp;Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza ,&nbsp;Jason A. Mendoza ,&nbsp;Sheila J. Santacroce ,&nbsp;Nina S. Kadan-Lottick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite heightened risk of chronic health conditions, &lt;20 % of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) receive guideline-recommended surveillance for late effects. Barriers include avoidance of reminders, lack of knowledge, and costs. The goal of the BRIDGES Study is to evaluate the effects of a multi-level, remote intervention on adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance among CCS by partnering with primary care providers (PCPs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This ongoing study is a multi-site, two-arm, prospective, parallel design, 1:1 randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (<em>N</em> = 240; <em>n</em> = 120/group). Eligibility criteria are: cancer diagnosis at age &lt; 21 years, 2.0–4.0 years post-cancer therapy, and no previous specialty survivorship clinic care. The intervention includes: 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with a cancer center nurse, including discussion of patient's individualized survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) ongoing patient-tailored health education within the electronic health record's patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone call between the cancer center nurse and PCP, including discussion of patient's SCP, and 4) an in-person PCP visit for survivorship care. Patients randomized to the comparison group are contacted to schedule an in-person visit at their cancer center-based survivorship clinic. Adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance tests (primary outcome) is assessed at 1-year post-randomization (primary follow-up time point) and 2-years post-randomization (for durability). Patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation; PCP knowledge and self-efficacy; and process outcomes are also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Models of survivorship care that overcome existing barriers are needed. If efficacious, this scalable, remote intervention would be a valuable strategy to address barriers and bridge gaps in care to reach more CCS.</div><div><strong>Clinical Trial Registration:</strong> <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: <span><span>NCT05448560</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425000539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425000539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管慢性健康状况的风险增加,方法:这项正在进行的研究是一项多地点、双臂、前瞻性、平行设计、1:1随机对照非效性试验(N = 240;n = 120 /组)。资格标准是:年龄时癌症诊断 结论:需要克服现有障碍的生存护理模式。如果有效,这种可扩展的远程干预将是一种有价值的策略,可以解决护理方面的障碍和弥合差距,从而实现更多的CCS。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05448560。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design and methods of a multi-level intervention to improve adherence to childhood cancer survivorship care by partnering with primary care providers: The BRIDGES randomized controlled trial

Background

Despite heightened risk of chronic health conditions, <20 % of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) receive guideline-recommended surveillance for late effects. Barriers include avoidance of reminders, lack of knowledge, and costs. The goal of the BRIDGES Study is to evaluate the effects of a multi-level, remote intervention on adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance among CCS by partnering with primary care providers (PCPs).

Methods

This ongoing study is a multi-site, two-arm, prospective, parallel design, 1:1 randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (N = 240; n = 120/group). Eligibility criteria are: cancer diagnosis at age < 21 years, 2.0–4.0 years post-cancer therapy, and no previous specialty survivorship clinic care. The intervention includes: 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with a cancer center nurse, including discussion of patient's individualized survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) ongoing patient-tailored health education within the electronic health record's patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone call between the cancer center nurse and PCP, including discussion of patient's SCP, and 4) an in-person PCP visit for survivorship care. Patients randomized to the comparison group are contacted to schedule an in-person visit at their cancer center-based survivorship clinic. Adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance tests (primary outcome) is assessed at 1-year post-randomization (primary follow-up time point) and 2-years post-randomization (for durability). Patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation; PCP knowledge and self-efficacy; and process outcomes are also assessed.

Conclusion

Models of survivorship care that overcome existing barriers are needed. If efficacious, this scalable, remote intervention would be a valuable strategy to address barriers and bridge gaps in care to reach more CCS.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05448560.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Protocol for a pilot trial assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and psychoeducation effectiveness of a single-session online parent-focused intervention targeting predictors of body image disturbance in young children Protocol for the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to reduce food insecurity and improve adherence in patients with hypertension (SMART-FI) Accelerating medicines to patients: A Bayesian quantitative evidence-based decision-making framework with interim monitoring Healthy aging as Black adults, in it together (HABIT): Protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial to address comorbid chronic pain and early cognitive decline among older, community-based Black adults Internal pilot sample size re-estimation for the B-free trial: A case study of a cluster randomized crossover trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1