“事件量表修订影响”在识别突发院外心脏骤停幸存者急性应激障碍中的临床应用:来自多中心REVIVAL队列的结果

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110558
M.K. Wagner , L.F. Hirsch , S.K. Berg , C. Hassager , B. Borregaard , T.B. Rasmussen , O. Ekholm , D.S. Stenbæk
{"title":"“事件量表修订影响”在识别突发院外心脏骤停幸存者急性应激障碍中的临床应用:来自多中心REVIVAL队列的结果","authors":"M.K. Wagner ,&nbsp;L.F. Hirsch ,&nbsp;S.K. Berg ,&nbsp;C. Hassager ,&nbsp;B. Borregaard ,&nbsp;T.B. Rasmussen ,&nbsp;O. Ekholm ,&nbsp;D.S. Stenbæk","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the Danish patient-reported Impact of Event-Scale Revised (IES-R) as a screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder in a population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The REVIVAL study was designed as a multicenter cohort study of OHCA survivors in which survivors self-reported the IES-R. A subset of survivors underwent the clinician-rated Acute Stress Disorder Interview during hospitalization. Psychometric evaluation of the IES-R included reliability and validity testing. Structural validity was assessed using factor analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve were used to evaluate the discriminative ability of different IES-R thresholds in classifying probable Acute Stress Disorder, as determined by interview. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each cut-off value. The best performing IES-R threshold was applied to the total population to examine prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 244 survivors completed the IES-R, out of which 106 completed the Acute Stress Disorder Interview. Good internal consistency and convergent validity of the IES-R were observed. Factor analysis supported the original three-factor structure of the IES-R. An IES-R total cut-off score of ≥30 showed the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio; the scale correctly classified 77% of the survivors with a sensitivity rate of 100% and a specificity rate of 75% (<em>n</em> = 106). Using this IES-R cut-off score, the prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder was 23% (<em>n</em> = 244).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The IES-R appears to be a useful screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder during hospitalisation and helps clinicians make post-cardiac arrest diagnostic and treatment decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110558"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of the ‘Impact of Event Scale-Revised’ for identifying Acute Stress Disorder in survivors of sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Results from the multicenter REVIVAL cohort\",\"authors\":\"M.K. Wagner ,&nbsp;L.F. Hirsch ,&nbsp;S.K. Berg ,&nbsp;C. Hassager ,&nbsp;B. Borregaard ,&nbsp;T.B. Rasmussen ,&nbsp;O. Ekholm ,&nbsp;D.S. Stenbæk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the Danish patient-reported Impact of Event-Scale Revised (IES-R) as a screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder in a population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The REVIVAL study was designed as a multicenter cohort study of OHCA survivors in which survivors self-reported the IES-R. A subset of survivors underwent the clinician-rated Acute Stress Disorder Interview during hospitalization. Psychometric evaluation of the IES-R included reliability and validity testing. Structural validity was assessed using factor analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve were used to evaluate the discriminative ability of different IES-R thresholds in classifying probable Acute Stress Disorder, as determined by interview. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each cut-off value. The best performing IES-R threshold was applied to the total population to examine prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 244 survivors completed the IES-R, out of which 106 completed the Acute Stress Disorder Interview. Good internal consistency and convergent validity of the IES-R were observed. Factor analysis supported the original three-factor structure of the IES-R. An IES-R total cut-off score of ≥30 showed the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio; the scale correctly classified 77% of the survivors with a sensitivity rate of 100% and a specificity rate of 75% (<em>n</em> = 106). Using this IES-R cut-off score, the prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder was 23% (<em>n</em> = 244).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The IES-R appears to be a useful screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder during hospitalisation and helps clinicians make post-cardiac arrest diagnostic and treatment decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030095722500070X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030095722500070X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估丹麦患者报告的事件量表修订版(IES-R)在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)幸存者中作为急性应激障碍筛查工具的影响。方法:REVIVAL研究被设计为OHCA幸存者的多中心队列研究,其中幸存者自我报告IES-R。一部分幸存者在住院期间接受了临床医生评定的急性应激障碍访谈。IES-R的心理测量学评价包括信度和效度检验。采用因子分析评估结构效度。采用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积来评价不同IES-R阈值对可能急性应激障碍分类的判别能力。计算每个临界值的敏感性和特异性。将表现最佳的IES-R阈值应用于总人口,以检查可能的急性应激障碍的患病率。结果:总共有244名幸存者完成了IES-R,其中106名完成了急性应激障碍访谈。IES-R具有良好的内部一致性和收敛效度。因子分析支持IES-R原来的三因子结构。IES-R总分值≥30为最佳的敏感性-特异性比;该量表正确分类了77%的幸存者,敏感性为100%,特异性为75% (n=106)。使用IES-R截止评分,可能的急性应激障碍患病率为23% (n=244)。结论:IES-R似乎是住院期间急性应激障碍的有用筛查工具,有助于临床医生做出心脏骤停后的诊断和治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical utility of the ‘Impact of Event Scale-Revised’ for identifying Acute Stress Disorder in survivors of sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Results from the multicenter REVIVAL cohort

Objectives

To evaluate the Danish patient-reported Impact of Event-Scale Revised (IES-R) as a screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder in a population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors.

Methods

The REVIVAL study was designed as a multicenter cohort study of OHCA survivors in which survivors self-reported the IES-R. A subset of survivors underwent the clinician-rated Acute Stress Disorder Interview during hospitalization. Psychometric evaluation of the IES-R included reliability and validity testing. Structural validity was assessed using factor analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve were used to evaluate the discriminative ability of different IES-R thresholds in classifying probable Acute Stress Disorder, as determined by interview. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each cut-off value. The best performing IES-R threshold was applied to the total population to examine prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder.

Results

Overall, 244 survivors completed the IES-R, out of which 106 completed the Acute Stress Disorder Interview. Good internal consistency and convergent validity of the IES-R were observed. Factor analysis supported the original three-factor structure of the IES-R. An IES-R total cut-off score of ≥30 showed the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio; the scale correctly classified 77% of the survivors with a sensitivity rate of 100% and a specificity rate of 75% (n = 106). Using this IES-R cut-off score, the prevalence of probable Acute Stress Disorder was 23% (n = 244).

Conclusion

The IES-R appears to be a useful screening tool for Acute Stress Disorder during hospitalisation and helps clinicians make post-cardiac arrest diagnostic and treatment decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Combined short- and mid-latency SSEP amplitudes for early prediction of favorable neurological recovery after cardiac arrest The CPR compression matrix: relationship among depth, recoil, and rate Rhythm-specific association of epinephrine with outcomes in non-shockable cardiac arrest: a nationwide propensity-matched study A randomised controlled trial of defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Manufactured futility: prehospital system failure as the primary determinant of resuscitation outcomes in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1