[以色列当局将私人资金转为公共资金的计划对体外受精治疗结果的影响]。

Harefuah Pub Date : 2025-02-01
Raoul Orvieto, Oshrit Shtossel, Tamar Shtral, Yael Raichenberg, Ravit Nahum
{"title":"[以色列当局将私人资金转为公共资金的计划对体外受精治疗结果的影响]。","authors":"Raoul Orvieto, Oshrit Shtossel, Tamar Shtral, Yael Raichenberg, Ravit Nahum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Israel's public funding policy for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is unique globally, with only minor restrictions. In late 2017, a program was launched to shift IVF treatments from private to public funding in an attempt to reduce waiting times, allowing IVF treatment in both public and private centers within the health basket.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to analyze the impact of this program on IVF treatment outcomes using data from the Clalit-Dan district.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Clalit-Dan District Health Insurance Fund (2014-2021) were analyzed, comparing IVF outcomes cumulative live birth rates (using Kaplan-Meier curves) in public and private centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the years 2014 and 2021, 14,509 IVF treatment cycles were performed within the health basket in the Dan District. After implementing the 2017 aforementioned programe, IVF cycles in private centers increased, with no change in public centers. Live birth rates were slightly higher in public centers compared to private centers (10.02% vs. 9.04%), but without statistical significance (p=0.13). A noticeable decline in live birth rates was observed after 2018, especially in fresh cycles. No significant differences were found between public and private centers for women aged 20-39 years, but for those aged 40-45 years, public centers had significantly higher live birth rates, particularly in fresh cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2017 program to shift IVF activity from private to public funding increased the burden on private centers and led to a decline in live birth rates, particularly for women over 40 years of age. The Ministry of Health, being entrusted, among other things, with the supervision and control of the IVF units in Israel, must examine and provide an adequate response to the issues raised above.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 2","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[THE EFFECT OF THE ISRAELI AUTHORITY PLAN TO DIVERT PRIVATE TO PUBLIC FUNDING ON THE RESULTS OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT OUTCOME].\",\"authors\":\"Raoul Orvieto, Oshrit Shtossel, Tamar Shtral, Yael Raichenberg, Ravit Nahum\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Israel's public funding policy for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is unique globally, with only minor restrictions. In late 2017, a program was launched to shift IVF treatments from private to public funding in an attempt to reduce waiting times, allowing IVF treatment in both public and private centers within the health basket.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to analyze the impact of this program on IVF treatment outcomes using data from the Clalit-Dan district.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Clalit-Dan District Health Insurance Fund (2014-2021) were analyzed, comparing IVF outcomes cumulative live birth rates (using Kaplan-Meier curves) in public and private centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the years 2014 and 2021, 14,509 IVF treatment cycles were performed within the health basket in the Dan District. After implementing the 2017 aforementioned programe, IVF cycles in private centers increased, with no change in public centers. Live birth rates were slightly higher in public centers compared to private centers (10.02% vs. 9.04%), but without statistical significance (p=0.13). A noticeable decline in live birth rates was observed after 2018, especially in fresh cycles. No significant differences were found between public and private centers for women aged 20-39 years, but for those aged 40-45 years, public centers had significantly higher live birth rates, particularly in fresh cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2017 program to shift IVF activity from private to public funding increased the burden on private centers and led to a decline in live birth rates, particularly for women over 40 years of age. The Ministry of Health, being entrusted, among other things, with the supervision and control of the IVF units in Israel, must examine and provide an adequate response to the issues raised above.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harefuah\",\"volume\":\"164 2\",\"pages\":\"77-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harefuah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[THE EFFECT OF THE ISRAELI AUTHORITY PLAN TO DIVERT PRIVATE TO PUBLIC FUNDING ON THE RESULTS OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT OUTCOME].

Introduction: Israel's public funding policy for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is unique globally, with only minor restrictions. In late 2017, a program was launched to shift IVF treatments from private to public funding in an attempt to reduce waiting times, allowing IVF treatment in both public and private centers within the health basket.

Objectives: The study aimed to analyze the impact of this program on IVF treatment outcomes using data from the Clalit-Dan district.

Methods: Data from the Clalit-Dan District Health Insurance Fund (2014-2021) were analyzed, comparing IVF outcomes cumulative live birth rates (using Kaplan-Meier curves) in public and private centers.

Results: Between the years 2014 and 2021, 14,509 IVF treatment cycles were performed within the health basket in the Dan District. After implementing the 2017 aforementioned programe, IVF cycles in private centers increased, with no change in public centers. Live birth rates were slightly higher in public centers compared to private centers (10.02% vs. 9.04%), but without statistical significance (p=0.13). A noticeable decline in live birth rates was observed after 2018, especially in fresh cycles. No significant differences were found between public and private centers for women aged 20-39 years, but for those aged 40-45 years, public centers had significantly higher live birth rates, particularly in fresh cycles.

Conclusions: The 2017 program to shift IVF activity from private to public funding increased the burden on private centers and led to a decline in live birth rates, particularly for women over 40 years of age. The Ministry of Health, being entrusted, among other things, with the supervision and control of the IVF units in Israel, must examine and provide an adequate response to the issues raised above.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[DISCOVERIES FROM THE WORLD OF CHINESE MEDICINE: TRADITIONAL SOLUTIONS FOR ROSACEA]. [ECTOPIC FALLOPIAN TUBE PREGNANCY RELOCATION TO THE UTERINE CAVITY - TRUTH OR FICTION? PRIMUM NON NOCERE]. [Hippocrates and language models - Primum Non Nocere - First do no harm]. [Hippocrates and language models - Primum Non Nocere - First do no harm]. [LACERTUS SYNDROME].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1