生态系统调节服务对空气质量的调节效应及影响机制——来自长江经济带的证据

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107887
Qiaoling Luo , Xiangyun Zeng , Junfang Zhou , Mingxing Liu , Youcheng Chu
{"title":"生态系统调节服务对空气质量的调节效应及影响机制——来自长江经济带的证据","authors":"Qiaoling Luo ,&nbsp;Xiangyun Zeng ,&nbsp;Junfang Zhou ,&nbsp;Mingxing Liu ,&nbsp;Youcheng Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Air quality, increasingly threatened by global climate change and human activities, critically impacts human well-being (HWB). While ecosystem services, benefits humans derive from natural ecosystems, are known to support HWB, the specific regulatory effects of ecosystem regulating services (ERS) on air quality remain unclear. Taking Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case, this study addresses this gap by introducing the air quality-ERS coordination index (AECI) to quantify the regulating effects of ERS on air quality. Coupling degree models, random forest regression, Shapley additive explanations, and accumulated local effects models were employed to examine the spatio-temporal heterogeneity and mechanisms influencing ERS regulating effects. The findings indicate that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, ERS in the YREB declined erratically, while air quality initially worsened but improved after 2013, influenced by China's air quality policies. (2) Analysis was divided into natural development (2000−2013) and policy intervention (2013−2020) periods, with ERS closely linked to air quality in both. (3) During policy intervention period, AECI values were 7.9 times higher than in natural development period. Along the urban development gradient, AECI increased in natural development period but decreased in policy intervention period, showing marked core-edge heterogeneity. Core cities exhibited the highest AECI in policy intervention period, indicating stronger policy responsiveness. (4) Population density, temperature, and land surface temperature were dominant factors influencing ERS regulating effects on air quality, with varying impacts across periods. This study enhances the understanding of ERS-air quality interactions and provides a scientific basis for future research and policy formulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 107887"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating effects and impact mechanisms of ecosystem regulating services on air quality: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China\",\"authors\":\"Qiaoling Luo ,&nbsp;Xiangyun Zeng ,&nbsp;Junfang Zhou ,&nbsp;Mingxing Liu ,&nbsp;Youcheng Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Air quality, increasingly threatened by global climate change and human activities, critically impacts human well-being (HWB). While ecosystem services, benefits humans derive from natural ecosystems, are known to support HWB, the specific regulatory effects of ecosystem regulating services (ERS) on air quality remain unclear. Taking Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case, this study addresses this gap by introducing the air quality-ERS coordination index (AECI) to quantify the regulating effects of ERS on air quality. Coupling degree models, random forest regression, Shapley additive explanations, and accumulated local effects models were employed to examine the spatio-temporal heterogeneity and mechanisms influencing ERS regulating effects. The findings indicate that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, ERS in the YREB declined erratically, while air quality initially worsened but improved after 2013, influenced by China's air quality policies. (2) Analysis was divided into natural development (2000−2013) and policy intervention (2013−2020) periods, with ERS closely linked to air quality in both. (3) During policy intervention period, AECI values were 7.9 times higher than in natural development period. Along the urban development gradient, AECI increased in natural development period but decreased in policy intervention period, showing marked core-edge heterogeneity. Core cities exhibited the highest AECI in policy intervention period, indicating stronger policy responsiveness. (4) Population density, temperature, and land surface temperature were dominant factors influencing ERS regulating effects on air quality, with varying impacts across periods. This study enhances the understanding of ERS-air quality interactions and provides a scientific basis for future research and policy formulation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000848\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气质量日益受到全球气候变化和人类活动的威胁,严重影响人类福祉(HWB)。虽然已知生态系统服务(人类从自然生态系统中获得的利益)支持HWB,但生态系统调节服务(ERS)对空气质量的具体调节作用尚不清楚。本文以长江经济带为例,引入空气质量-ERS协调指数(AECI)来量化ERS对空气质量的调节作用,弥补了这一空白。采用耦合度模型、随机森林回归模型、Shapley加性解释模型和累积局部效应模型分析了ERS调控效应的时空异质性及其影响机制。结果表明:(1)受中国空气质量政策的影响,2000 - 2020年长江经济带ERS呈不规则下降趋势,2013年后空气质量呈现先恶化后改善的趋势。(2)分析分为自然发展期(2000 - 2013年)和政策干预期(2013 - 2020年),两者的ERS与空气质量密切相关。③政策干预期的AECI值是自然发展期的7.9倍。在城市发展梯度上,AECI在自然发展期呈上升趋势,在政策干预期呈下降趋势,表现出明显的核心边缘异质性。核心城市在政策干预期的AECI最高,表明政策响应能力较强。(4)人口密度、气温和地表温度是影响ERS对空气质量调节作用的主要因子,不同时期的影响差异较大。本研究增强了对ERS-air quality相互作用的认识,为未来的研究和政策制定提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulating effects and impact mechanisms of ecosystem regulating services on air quality: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
Air quality, increasingly threatened by global climate change and human activities, critically impacts human well-being (HWB). While ecosystem services, benefits humans derive from natural ecosystems, are known to support HWB, the specific regulatory effects of ecosystem regulating services (ERS) on air quality remain unclear. Taking Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case, this study addresses this gap by introducing the air quality-ERS coordination index (AECI) to quantify the regulating effects of ERS on air quality. Coupling degree models, random forest regression, Shapley additive explanations, and accumulated local effects models were employed to examine the spatio-temporal heterogeneity and mechanisms influencing ERS regulating effects. The findings indicate that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, ERS in the YREB declined erratically, while air quality initially worsened but improved after 2013, influenced by China's air quality policies. (2) Analysis was divided into natural development (2000−2013) and policy intervention (2013−2020) periods, with ERS closely linked to air quality in both. (3) During policy intervention period, AECI values were 7.9 times higher than in natural development period. Along the urban development gradient, AECI increased in natural development period but decreased in policy intervention period, showing marked core-edge heterogeneity. Core cities exhibited the highest AECI in policy intervention period, indicating stronger policy responsiveness. (4) Population density, temperature, and land surface temperature were dominant factors influencing ERS regulating effects on air quality, with varying impacts across periods. This study enhances the understanding of ERS-air quality interactions and provides a scientific basis for future research and policy formulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Modeling the environmental benefits of recycling infrastructure demolition waste into recycled aggregate concrete bricks Integrating citizen science and machine learning to guide urban biodiversity planning: A case study of Belgium's top 10 urban regions Low-carbon innovation prediction: Identifying the key driving factors of different categories of low-carbon technological innovation in China Knowing when to stop: Threshold effects of human disturbance on ecosystem health in the Taihu Basin, China Comprehensive evaluation of regional sustainable development along the belt and road from production and consumption perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1