IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492495
Fenghua Jin, Yixuan Hu
{"title":"Association between living arrangements, social support, and depression among middle-aged and older adults: a mediation analysis from the CHARLS survey.","authors":"Fenghua Jin, Yixuan Hu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Living alone was reported to be associated with a higher risk of depression. Social support may play a crucial role in mediating this association. However, data are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for wave 5 (2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were extracted. Associations between living arrangements and social support or depression were assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. Causal mediation analysis under a counterfactual framework was employed to evaluate the mediation effect of social support in the association between living arrangements and depression, which was performed by fitting two logistic regression models. The mediation effect is measured by the percentage mediated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17,418 participants were included in this study, of which 208 (1.2%) lived alone. Compared to participants not living alone, those living alone were associated with a higher risk of low social support (10.6% vs. 3.9%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.10-2.80) and depression (15.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.28). Mediation analyses revealed that 2.7% (95% CI, -1.1% to 6.5%) of the relationship between living arrangements and depression was mediated by social support. Sensitivity analyses by varying definitions of living alone or limiting analysis in the elderly population yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low social support did not mediate the association between living status and depression. Tailored strategies for improving living arrangements may needed to improve the mental health of living alone older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1492495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言据报道,独居者患抑郁症的风险较高。社会支持在调节这种关联方面可能起着至关重要的作用。然而,相关数据十分有限:方法:提取了中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)第 5 波(2020 年)的数据。通过多变量逻辑回归模型评估居住安排与社会支持或抑郁之间的关联。采用反事实框架下的因果中介分析,通过拟合两个逻辑回归模型来评估社会支持在生活安排与抑郁之间的中介效应。中介效应以中介百分比来衡量:本研究共纳入 17,418 名参与者,其中 208 人(1.2%)独居。与非独居参与者相比,独居者患低社会支持(10.6% 对 3.9%;调整 OR [aOR],1.75;95% CI,1.10-2.80)和抑郁症(15.4% 对 7.2%;调整 OR,1.53;95% CI,1.02-2.28)的风险较高。中介分析显示,在生活安排与抑郁之间的关系中,2.7%(95% CI,-1.1% 至 6.5%)是由社会支持中介的。通过改变独居的定义或限制对老年人群的分析进行敏感性分析,得出了一致的结果:低社会支持并不能调节生活状况与抑郁之间的关系。要改善独居老年人的心理健康,可能需要采取有针对性的策略来改善生活安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between living arrangements, social support, and depression among middle-aged and older adults: a mediation analysis from the CHARLS survey.

Introduction: Living alone was reported to be associated with a higher risk of depression. Social support may play a crucial role in mediating this association. However, data are limited.

Methods: Data for wave 5 (2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were extracted. Associations between living arrangements and social support or depression were assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. Causal mediation analysis under a counterfactual framework was employed to evaluate the mediation effect of social support in the association between living arrangements and depression, which was performed by fitting two logistic regression models. The mediation effect is measured by the percentage mediated.

Results: A total of 17,418 participants were included in this study, of which 208 (1.2%) lived alone. Compared to participants not living alone, those living alone were associated with a higher risk of low social support (10.6% vs. 3.9%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.10-2.80) and depression (15.4% vs. 7.2%; adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.28). Mediation analyses revealed that 2.7% (95% CI, -1.1% to 6.5%) of the relationship between living arrangements and depression was mediated by social support. Sensitivity analyses by varying definitions of living alone or limiting analysis in the elderly population yielded consistent results.

Conclusions: Low social support did not mediate the association between living status and depression. Tailored strategies for improving living arrangements may needed to improve the mental health of living alone older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial hazards and work-life balance: the role of workplace conflict, rivalry, and harassment in Latvia. The effect of shared leadership on employee resilience: wielding the double-edged sword. The psychologically rich life questionnaire: Italian validation and exploration of its relationships with mindfulness, self-compassion, and cognitive fusion within the health psychology framework. The psychological resilience of teenagers in terms of their everyday emotional balance and the impact of emotion regulation strategies. Bibliometric analysis of global research on dialectical behavior therapy from 1987 to 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1