IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Toxics Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.3390/toxics13020096
Linda Matisāne, Lāsma Akūlova, Žanna Martinsone, Ilona Pavlovska, Laura Komarovska, Kristiāna Venžega, Dace Jakimova, Kristīne Sproģe, Normunds Kadiķis, Inese Mārtiņsone, Madlen David, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Ivars Vanadziņš
{"title":"Identification, Evaluation and Prioritization of Chemicals for National Human Biomonitoring Program: Insights from Latvia.","authors":"Linda Matisāne, Lāsma Akūlova, Žanna Martinsone, Ilona Pavlovska, Laura Komarovska, Kristiāna Venžega, Dace Jakimova, Kristīne Sproģe, Normunds Kadiķis, Inese Mārtiņsone, Madlen David, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Ivars Vanadziņš","doi":"10.3390/toxics13020096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human biomonitoring (HBM) is a critical tool for assessing chemical exposure in populations and informing public health policies. This study aimed to prioritize chemical substances for the development of a national HBM program in Latvia, addressing the need for systematic evaluation of chemicals in the local context. Initially, 318 chemical substances were reviewed, of which 130 were shortlisted and assessed using an adapted Hanlon methodology. Substances were assessed based on their health significance, hazardous properties, exposure characteristics, national relevance, and public interest. The results identified 30 high-priority substances across various categories, providing a foundation for the HBM4LV program. This prioritization process highlighted the challenges of data gaps, resource limitations, and the need to balance national priorities with alignment to European frameworks. Despite addressing key methodological challenges, the study highlights the importance for ongoing refinement, robust data collection, and strengthened international collaboration to enhance the program's scope and long-term sustainability. While the methodology addressed key challenges, further refinement and international collaboration are essential to enhance the program's scope and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13020096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体生物监测 (HBM) 是评估人群中化学品暴露情况并为公共卫生政策提供信息的重要工具。本研究旨在为拉脱维亚制定国家 HBM 计划确定化学物质的优先次序,以满足在当地对化学品进行系统评估的需要。最初,研究人员对 318 种化学物质进行了审查,并采用经改编的 Hanlon 方法对其中 130 种化学物质进行了筛选和评估。评估物质的依据是其对健康的重要性、危险特性、接触特征、国家相关性和公众利益。结果确定了 30 种不同类别的高优先级物质,为 HBM4LV 计划奠定了基础。这一优先排序过程凸显了数据缺口、资源限制以及平衡国家优先事项与欧洲框架一致性的必要性等挑战。尽管解决了方法论上的主要挑战,但该研究强调了不断完善、强大的数据收集和加强国际合作以扩大计划范围和长期可持续性的重要性。虽然方法论解决了关键挑战,但进一步完善和国际合作对于扩大计划范围和提高可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification, Evaluation and Prioritization of Chemicals for National Human Biomonitoring Program: Insights from Latvia.

Human biomonitoring (HBM) is a critical tool for assessing chemical exposure in populations and informing public health policies. This study aimed to prioritize chemical substances for the development of a national HBM program in Latvia, addressing the need for systematic evaluation of chemicals in the local context. Initially, 318 chemical substances were reviewed, of which 130 were shortlisted and assessed using an adapted Hanlon methodology. Substances were assessed based on their health significance, hazardous properties, exposure characteristics, national relevance, and public interest. The results identified 30 high-priority substances across various categories, providing a foundation for the HBM4LV program. This prioritization process highlighted the challenges of data gaps, resource limitations, and the need to balance national priorities with alignment to European frameworks. Despite addressing key methodological challenges, the study highlights the importance for ongoing refinement, robust data collection, and strengthened international collaboration to enhance the program's scope and long-term sustainability. While the methodology addressed key challenges, further refinement and international collaboration are essential to enhance the program's scope and sustainability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
期刊最新文献
Air Pollution Exposure and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Risk: A Retrospective Case-Control Study with Multi-Pollutant Analysis in Wuhan, Hubei Province. Effects of Environmental Chemical Pollutants on Microbiome Diversity: Insights from Shotgun Metagenomics. Impact of Emission Standards on Fine Particulate Matter Toxicity: A Long-Term Analysis in Los Angeles. Ambient Air Pollution and Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Network Pharmacology to Unveil the Mechanism of Berberine in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Meningitis in Humans and Pigs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1