{"title":"间质性肺疾病中抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体的流行及临床意义:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Tingting Wu, Chao Cao, Zekai Cen, Haijun Zhou, Dan Lv, Yun Zhang, Qunli Ding","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are occasionally positive in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The positivity rates of ANCAs in various types of ILD and the role of ANCAs in ILD are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ANCAs in Chinese people diagnosed with ILD (including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) and identify differences in clinical features, radiographic features, and survival between patients with ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative ILD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 706 ILD patients with available ANCA results from March 2010 to October 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University. Patient demographics, symptoms, laboratory parameters, chest CT, and pulmonary function testing results were collected and analysed at each patient’s initial diagnosis. The prevalence and associations of ANCAs with clinical characteristics and survival were evaluated. Results ANCAs were positive in 158 of the 706 (22.4%) ILD patients. Compared with ANCA-negative ILD patients, ANCA-positive ILD patients tended to be older, had higher CRP and ESR levels, and had a significantly greater proportion of rheumatoid factor positivity. In total, 58.2% (92/158) of patients were ANCA-positive on average (41.6 ± 31.4) months after ILD diagnosis. Patients with ANCA-positive ILD had higher all-cause mortality than did those with ANCA-negative ILD (33.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.033). The usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (56.3%) was the most common chest HRCT pattern. The proportions of patients with honeycombing (p < 0.001) and oddly shaped cysts (p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the ANCA-positive ILD group than in the ANCA-negative ILD group. Acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.37–4.22, p = 0.002) was independently associated with shorter survival, and receiving glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressants (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57, p < 0.001) was independently associated with longer survival in ANCA-positive ILD patients. Conclusions The prevalence of ANCAs in patients with ILD is not rare, and ANCA testing in ILD patients is necessary. Oddly shaped cysts with or without a UIP pattern may be a characteristic chest imaging manifestation of ANCA-positive ILDs. The frequency of AEs in ANCA-positive ILD patients is high, and more attention should be given to ANCA-positive ILD patients who have AEs.","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in interstitial lung disease: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Wu, Chao Cao, Zekai Cen, Haijun Zhou, Dan Lv, Yun Zhang, Qunli Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are occasionally positive in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The positivity rates of ANCAs in various types of ILD and the role of ANCAs in ILD are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ANCAs in Chinese people diagnosed with ILD (including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) and identify differences in clinical features, radiographic features, and survival between patients with ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative ILD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 706 ILD patients with available ANCA results from March 2010 to October 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University. Patient demographics, symptoms, laboratory parameters, chest CT, and pulmonary function testing results were collected and analysed at each patient’s initial diagnosis. The prevalence and associations of ANCAs with clinical characteristics and survival were evaluated. Results ANCAs were positive in 158 of the 706 (22.4%) ILD patients. Compared with ANCA-negative ILD patients, ANCA-positive ILD patients tended to be older, had higher CRP and ESR levels, and had a significantly greater proportion of rheumatoid factor positivity. In total, 58.2% (92/158) of patients were ANCA-positive on average (41.6 ± 31.4) months after ILD diagnosis. Patients with ANCA-positive ILD had higher all-cause mortality than did those with ANCA-negative ILD (33.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.033). The usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (56.3%) was the most common chest HRCT pattern. The proportions of patients with honeycombing (p < 0.001) and oddly shaped cysts (p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the ANCA-positive ILD group than in the ANCA-negative ILD group. Acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.37–4.22, p = 0.002) was independently associated with shorter survival, and receiving glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressants (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57, p < 0.001) was independently associated with longer survival in ANCA-positive ILD patients. Conclusions The prevalence of ANCAs in patients with ILD is not rare, and ANCA testing in ILD patients is necessary. Oddly shaped cysts with or without a UIP pattern may be a characteristic chest imaging manifestation of ANCA-positive ILDs. The frequency of AEs in ANCA-positive ILD patients is high, and more attention should be given to ANCA-positive ILD patients who have AEs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCAs)在间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者中偶有阳性。不同类型ILD中anca的阳性率及anca在ILD中的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是估计中国被诊断为ILD(包括特发性肺纤维化)的患者中anca的患病率,并确定anca阳性和anca阴性ILD患者的临床特征、影像学特征和生存率的差异。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2023年10月宁波大学第一附属医院706例具有可用ANCA结果的ILD患者的资料。收集并分析每位患者初始诊断时的患者人口统计学、症状、实验室参数、胸部CT和肺功能检测结果。评估anca的患病率及其与临床特征和生存的关系。结果706例ILD患者中有158例(22.4%)的anca阳性。与anca阴性ILD患者相比,anca阳性ILD患者年龄偏大,CRP和ESR水平较高,类风湿因子阳性比例明显高于阴性ILD患者。总的来说,58.2%(92/158)的患者在ILD诊断后平均(41.6±31.4)个月为anca阳性。anca阳性ILD患者的全因死亡率高于anca阴性ILD患者(33.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.033)。常见间质性肺炎(UIP)型(56.3%)是最常见的胸部HRCT型。蜂窝患者比例(p <;0.001)和形状奇怪的囊肿(p <;0.001), anca阳性ILD组明显高于anca阴性ILD组。ILD的急性加重(AE) (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.37-4.22, p = 0.002)与较短的生存期独立相关,而接受糖皮质激素联合免疫抑制剂(HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p &;0.001)与anca阳性ILD患者更长的生存期独立相关。结论在ILD患者中,ANCA的发生率并不罕见,有必要对ILD患者进行ANCA检测。形状奇特的囊肿伴或不伴UIP模式可能是anca阳性ild的特征性胸部影像学表现。在anca阳性ILD患者中发生ae的频率较高,对于有ae的anca阳性ILD患者应给予更多关注。
Prevalence and clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in interstitial lung disease: A retrospective cohort study
Objectives Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are occasionally positive in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The positivity rates of ANCAs in various types of ILD and the role of ANCAs in ILD are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ANCAs in Chinese people diagnosed with ILD (including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) and identify differences in clinical features, radiographic features, and survival between patients with ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative ILD. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 706 ILD patients with available ANCA results from March 2010 to October 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University. Patient demographics, symptoms, laboratory parameters, chest CT, and pulmonary function testing results were collected and analysed at each patient’s initial diagnosis. The prevalence and associations of ANCAs with clinical characteristics and survival were evaluated. Results ANCAs were positive in 158 of the 706 (22.4%) ILD patients. Compared with ANCA-negative ILD patients, ANCA-positive ILD patients tended to be older, had higher CRP and ESR levels, and had a significantly greater proportion of rheumatoid factor positivity. In total, 58.2% (92/158) of patients were ANCA-positive on average (41.6 ± 31.4) months after ILD diagnosis. Patients with ANCA-positive ILD had higher all-cause mortality than did those with ANCA-negative ILD (33.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.033). The usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (56.3%) was the most common chest HRCT pattern. The proportions of patients with honeycombing (p < 0.001) and oddly shaped cysts (p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the ANCA-positive ILD group than in the ANCA-negative ILD group. Acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.37–4.22, p = 0.002) was independently associated with shorter survival, and receiving glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressants (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57, p < 0.001) was independently associated with longer survival in ANCA-positive ILD patients. Conclusions The prevalence of ANCAs in patients with ILD is not rare, and ANCA testing in ILD patients is necessary. Oddly shaped cysts with or without a UIP pattern may be a characteristic chest imaging manifestation of ANCA-positive ILDs. The frequency of AEs in ANCA-positive ILD patients is high, and more attention should be given to ANCA-positive ILD patients who have AEs.
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.