{"title":"从无费米子回路图验证十阶 QED 对电子反常磁矩的贡献","authors":"Tatsumi Aoyama, Masashi Hayakawa, Akira Hirayama, Makiko Nio","doi":"10.1103/physrevd.111.l031902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A discrepancy of approximately 5</a:mn>σ</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> exists between the two known results for the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, calculated from Feynman vertex diagrams without fermion loops. To investigate this, we decomposed this contribution into 389 parts based on a self-energy diagram representation, enabling a diagram-by-diagram numerical comparison of the two calculations. No significant discrepancies were found for individual diagrams. However, the numerical differences of the 98 diagrams sharing a common structure were not randomly distributed. The accumulation of these differences resulted in the <c:math xmlns:c=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><c:mrow><c:mn>5</c:mn><c:mi>σ</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> discrepancy. A recalculation with increased statistics in the Monte Carlo integration was performed for these 98 diagrams. By replacing the old values with the new ones for these 98 integrals, we have obtained a revised result of <e:math xmlns:e=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><e:mn>6.800</e:mn><e:mo>±</e:mo><e:mn>0.128</e:mn></e:math>, thereby resolving the discrepancy. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>","PeriodicalId":20167,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review D","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron from diagrams without fermion loops\",\"authors\":\"Tatsumi Aoyama, Masashi Hayakawa, Akira Hirayama, Makiko Nio\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevd.111.l031902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A discrepancy of approximately 5</a:mn>σ</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> exists between the two known results for the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, calculated from Feynman vertex diagrams without fermion loops. To investigate this, we decomposed this contribution into 389 parts based on a self-energy diagram representation, enabling a diagram-by-diagram numerical comparison of the two calculations. No significant discrepancies were found for individual diagrams. However, the numerical differences of the 98 diagrams sharing a common structure were not randomly distributed. The accumulation of these differences resulted in the <c:math xmlns:c=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><c:mrow><c:mn>5</c:mn><c:mi>σ</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> discrepancy. A recalculation with increased statistics in the Monte Carlo integration was performed for these 98 diagrams. By replacing the old values with the new ones for these 98 integrals, we have obtained a revised result of <e:math xmlns:e=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><e:mn>6.800</e:mn><e:mo>±</e:mo><e:mn>0.128</e:mn></e:math>, thereby resolving the discrepancy. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review D\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review D\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.l031902\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review D","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.l031902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Verification of the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron from diagrams without fermion loops
A discrepancy of approximately 5σ exists between the two known results for the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, calculated from Feynman vertex diagrams without fermion loops. To investigate this, we decomposed this contribution into 389 parts based on a self-energy diagram representation, enabling a diagram-by-diagram numerical comparison of the two calculations. No significant discrepancies were found for individual diagrams. However, the numerical differences of the 98 diagrams sharing a common structure were not randomly distributed. The accumulation of these differences resulted in the 5σ discrepancy. A recalculation with increased statistics in the Monte Carlo integration was performed for these 98 diagrams. By replacing the old values with the new ones for these 98 integrals, we have obtained a revised result of 6.800±0.128, thereby resolving the discrepancy. Published by the American Physical Society2025
期刊介绍:
Physical Review D (PRD) is a leading journal in elementary particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology and is one of the top-cited journals in high-energy physics.
PRD covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of particle physics, field theory, gravitation and cosmology, including:
Particle physics experiments,
Electroweak interactions,
Strong interactions,
Lattice field theories, lattice QCD,
Beyond the standard model physics,
Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods,
Gravity, cosmology, cosmic rays,
Astrophysics and astroparticle physics,
General relativity,
Formal aspects of field theory, field theory in curved space,
String theory, quantum gravity, gauge/gravity duality.