Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang
{"title":"黄河中游干旱梯度生态系统服务权衡与协同效应:时间尺度视角","authors":"Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang","doi":"10.1002/eco.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem Services Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Drought Gradients in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin: A Time Scale Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在全球气候变化的背景下,了解生态系统服务之间的权衡和协同作用对区域生态管理和可持续发展至关重要。利用卡耐基-阿姆斯-斯坦福方法(CASA)和生态系统服务与权衡综合评估(InVEST)模型,对2000年和2020年黄河中游流域的净初级生产力(NPP)和快速流量(QF)进行了模拟,评估了与碳固存(CS)和产水(WY)相关的ESs。通过划分不同干旱频率的区域,评估了不同干旱条件下ESs权衡的协同多时间尺度变化。结果表明:(1)MRYRB年平均NPP由2000年的189.03 g C/m2上升至2020年的335.94 g C/m2,上升幅度为77.71%;年平均QF由2000年的41.20 mm上升至2020年的59.59 mm,上升幅度为44.64%;(2)在月尺度上,权衡与协同关系表现出明显的季节变化,全年都存在权衡,而在夏秋季,CS和WY从权衡转向协同。在年度规模上,协同效应是主导关系;(3)在月尺度上,高频干旱地区的权衡与协同效应最强,而在年尺度上,低频干旱地区的权衡与协同效应最强。本研究深入分析了不同时间尺度下不同干旱条件下生态系统之间的相互作用。研究结果突出了生态系统的权衡和协同效应的显著差异,为区域生态系统的协调管理提供了有价值的科学见解。
Ecosystem Services Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Drought Gradients in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin: A Time Scale Perspective
In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m2 in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m2 in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.