黄河中游干旱梯度生态系统服务权衡与协同效应:时间尺度视角

IF 2.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1002/eco.70006
Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang
{"title":"黄河中游干旱梯度生态系统服务权衡与协同效应:时间尺度视角","authors":"Xiaoliang Shi,&nbsp;Xi Chen,&nbsp;Hao Ding,&nbsp;Dan Zhang,&nbsp;Xinshuang Wang","doi":"10.1002/eco.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem Services Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Drought Gradients in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin: A Time Scale Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoliang Shi,&nbsp;Xi Chen,&nbsp;Hao Ding,&nbsp;Dan Zhang,&nbsp;Xinshuang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球气候变化的背景下,了解生态系统服务之间的权衡和协同作用对区域生态管理和可持续发展至关重要。利用卡耐基-阿姆斯-斯坦福方法(CASA)和生态系统服务与权衡综合评估(InVEST)模型,对2000年和2020年黄河中游流域的净初级生产力(NPP)和快速流量(QF)进行了模拟,评估了与碳固存(CS)和产水(WY)相关的ESs。通过划分不同干旱频率的区域,评估了不同干旱条件下ESs权衡的协同多时间尺度变化。结果表明:(1)MRYRB年平均NPP由2000年的189.03 g C/m2上升至2020年的335.94 g C/m2,上升幅度为77.71%;年平均QF由2000年的41.20 mm上升至2020年的59.59 mm,上升幅度为44.64%;(2)在月尺度上,权衡与协同关系表现出明显的季节变化,全年都存在权衡,而在夏秋季,CS和WY从权衡转向协同。在年度规模上,协同效应是主导关系;(3)在月尺度上,高频干旱地区的权衡与协同效应最强,而在年尺度上,低频干旱地区的权衡与协同效应最强。本研究深入分析了不同时间尺度下不同干旱条件下生态系统之间的相互作用。研究结果突出了生态系统的权衡和协同效应的显著差异,为区域生态系统的协调管理提供了有价值的科学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecosystem Services Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Drought Gradients in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin: A Time Scale Perspective

In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m2 in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m2 in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
期刊最新文献
Refined Environmental Flow Management: Integrating Fish Multiple Life-Stage Requirements Into Fine-Scale Operation of Cascade Reservoirs Using Radon (222Rn) to Trace Variability in Greenhouse Gas Emission From Tree Stems Across Species, Seasons and Stem Heights Hydroecological Controls on Algal Community Dynamics and Trophic Status in Freshwater Habitats Combined Effects of Urbanization and Drought as Modulators of Phytoplankton Structure in Temperate Plain Streams Rock Particles Promote Dew Formation: Aiming to Explain Ambiguous Published Findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1