应用微血管显像评价口服和病灶内类固醇治疗特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎的疗效。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1111/ans.70044
Oğuz Karakayalı MD, Yasemin Kayadibi MD, Berrin Papila MD, Seda Aladag Kurt MD, Gökçen Yıldız Civan MD, Mehmet Velidedeoglu MD, Mehmet Halit Yılmaz MD
{"title":"应用微血管显像评价口服和病灶内类固醇治疗特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎的疗效。","authors":"Oğuz Karakayalı MD,&nbsp;Yasemin Kayadibi MD,&nbsp;Berrin Papila MD,&nbsp;Seda Aladag Kurt MD,&nbsp;Gökçen Yıldız Civan MD,&nbsp;Mehmet Velidedeoglu MD,&nbsp;Mehmet Halit Yılmaz MD","doi":"10.1111/ans.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral and intralesional steroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) cases with clinical, ultrasonography (US) and Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 53 patients with newly diagnosed IGM who applied to our outpatient clinic between September 2021 and December 2022 were included. Oral steroid therapy was administered to 26 patients, while intralesional steroid therapy was administered to 27 patients. Pretreatment and postreatment difference of the affected area was compared clinically (Unresponsive to treatment: stable or progression; Partial response: &lt;50% reduction; Near complete response: &gt;50% reduction; Complete response: 100% reduction) and radiologically. Grey scale US (size, skin thickness) and SMI vascular index (SMIvi) for vascularization of the pathological area were noted. Recurrence and side-effect rates at the 6 months were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy of oral steroid and intralesional steroid treatment, both radiologically (<i>P</i> = 0.839) and clinically (<i>P</i> = 0.550). There was a considerable difference in size and SMIvi values before and after treatment (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) in patients with an adequate response. There was no significant difference between the two treatment methods in terms of recurrence (<i>P</i> = 0.153) or side effects (<i>P</i> = 1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Intralesional steroid was as effective as oral steroid treatment in IGM patients, and SMI is a reliable sonographic method that can be used to evaluate clinical findings, treatment response, and patient follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 9","pages":"1828-1835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the treatment effectiveness of oral and intralesional steroids in idiopathic granulomatous mastitis using superb microvascular imaging\",\"authors\":\"Oğuz Karakayalı MD,&nbsp;Yasemin Kayadibi MD,&nbsp;Berrin Papila MD,&nbsp;Seda Aladag Kurt MD,&nbsp;Gökçen Yıldız Civan MD,&nbsp;Mehmet Velidedeoglu MD,&nbsp;Mehmet Halit Yılmaz MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral and intralesional steroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) cases with clinical, ultrasonography (US) and Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 53 patients with newly diagnosed IGM who applied to our outpatient clinic between September 2021 and December 2022 were included. Oral steroid therapy was administered to 26 patients, while intralesional steroid therapy was administered to 27 patients. Pretreatment and postreatment difference of the affected area was compared clinically (Unresponsive to treatment: stable or progression; Partial response: &lt;50% reduction; Near complete response: &gt;50% reduction; Complete response: 100% reduction) and radiologically. Grey scale US (size, skin thickness) and SMI vascular index (SMIvi) for vascularization of the pathological area were noted. Recurrence and side-effect rates at the 6 months were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy of oral steroid and intralesional steroid treatment, both radiologically (<i>P</i> = 0.839) and clinically (<i>P</i> = 0.550). There was a considerable difference in size and SMIvi values before and after treatment (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) in patients with an adequate response. There was no significant difference between the two treatment methods in terms of recurrence (<i>P</i> = 0.153) or side effects (<i>P</i> = 1).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intralesional steroid was as effective as oral steroid treatment in IGM patients, and SMI is a reliable sonographic method that can be used to evaluate clinical findings, treatment response, and patient follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"95 9\",\"pages\":\"1828-1835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.70044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.70044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在根据临床、超声波检查(US)和超级微血管成像(SMI)结果,比较口服和局部注射类固醇治疗特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎(IGM)病例的疗效:方法:纳入2021年9月至2022年12月期间到我院门诊就诊的53名新确诊IGM患者。26名患者接受了口服类固醇治疗,27名患者接受了鞘内类固醇治疗。临床上比较了治疗前和治疗后患处的差异(治疗无反应:稳定或进展;部分反应:减少 50%;完全反应:减少 50%):部分反应:减少 50%;完全反应:减少 100%)和放射学检查:完全反应:缩小 100%)和放射学检查。灰度 US(大小、皮肤厚度)和 SMI 血管指数(SMIvi)显示病变区域的血管情况。比较了 6 个月后的复发率和副作用率:结果:口服类固醇激素和鞘内类固醇激素治疗的疗效在放射学(P = 0.839)和临床(P = 0.550)上均无统计学差异。治疗前后的大小和 SMIvi 值差异很大(P 结论:口服类固醇和内服类固醇的疗效相同:SMI是一种可靠的超声检查方法,可用于评估临床结果、治疗反应和患者随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the treatment effectiveness of oral and intralesional steroids in idiopathic granulomatous mastitis using superb microvascular imaging

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral and intralesional steroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) cases with clinical, ultrasonography (US) and Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) findings.

Methods

A total of 53 patients with newly diagnosed IGM who applied to our outpatient clinic between September 2021 and December 2022 were included. Oral steroid therapy was administered to 26 patients, while intralesional steroid therapy was administered to 27 patients. Pretreatment and postreatment difference of the affected area was compared clinically (Unresponsive to treatment: stable or progression; Partial response: <50% reduction; Near complete response: >50% reduction; Complete response: 100% reduction) and radiologically. Grey scale US (size, skin thickness) and SMI vascular index (SMIvi) for vascularization of the pathological area were noted. Recurrence and side-effect rates at the 6 months were compared.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found in the efficacy of oral steroid and intralesional steroid treatment, both radiologically (P = 0.839) and clinically (P = 0.550). There was a considerable difference in size and SMIvi values before and after treatment (P < 0.001) in patients with an adequate response. There was no significant difference between the two treatment methods in terms of recurrence (P = 0.153) or side effects (P = 1).

Conclusion

Intralesional steroid was as effective as oral steroid treatment in IGM patients, and SMI is a reliable sonographic method that can be used to evaluate clinical findings, treatment response, and patient follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Role of VAC in the Treatment of Fournier's Gangrene. Timeliness of Care and Treatment Patterns for Pancreatic Cancer in Victoria, Australia: Comparison With Optimal Care Pathways Targets. Re: How I Do It-Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) Ligation of the Thoracic Duct Using Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence for Chyle Leak. The American College of Surgeons Minimum Hospital Standardization Programme and the Foundation of the College of Surgeons of Australasia. Introducing a Dedicated Plastic Surgery Burns Dressings Clinic in Rural Australia: Challenges and Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1