{"title":"使用带有规则的人工智能算法进行自闭症数据分类:重点审查。","authors":"Abdulhamid Alsbakhi, Fadi Thabtah, Joan Lu","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12020160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents challenges in early screening due to its varied nature and sophisticated early signs. From a machine-learning (ML) perspective, the primary challenges include the need for large, diverse datasets, managing the variability in ASD symptoms, providing easy-to-understand models, and ensuring ASD predictive models that can be employed across different populations. Interpretable or explainable classification algorithms, like rule-based or decision tree, play a crucial role in dealing with some of these issues by offering classification models that can be exploited by clinicians. These models offer transparency in decision-making, allowing clinicians to understand reasons behind diagnostic decisions, which is critical for trust and adoption in medical settings. In addition, interpretable classification algorithms facilitate the identification of important behavioural features and patterns associated with ASD, enabling more accurate and explainable diagnoses. However, there is a scarcity of review papers focusing on interpretable classifiers for ASD detection from a behavioural perspective. Thereby this research aimed to conduct a recent review on rule-based classification research works in order to provide added value by consolidating current research, identifying gaps, and guiding future studies. Our research would enhance the understanding of these techniques, based on data used to generate models and obtain performance by trying to highlight early detection and intervention ways for ASD. Integrating advanced AI methods like deep learning with rule-based classifiers can improve model interpretability, exploration, and accuracy in ASD-detection applications. While this hybrid approach has feature selection relevant features that can be detected in an efficient manner, rule-based classifiers can provide clinicians with transparent explanations for model decisions. This hybrid approach is critical in clinical applications like ASD, where model content is as crucial as achieving high classification accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autism Data Classification Using AI Algorithms with Rules: Focused Review.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulhamid Alsbakhi, Fadi Thabtah, Joan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12020160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents challenges in early screening due to its varied nature and sophisticated early signs. From a machine-learning (ML) perspective, the primary challenges include the need for large, diverse datasets, managing the variability in ASD symptoms, providing easy-to-understand models, and ensuring ASD predictive models that can be employed across different populations. Interpretable or explainable classification algorithms, like rule-based or decision tree, play a crucial role in dealing with some of these issues by offering classification models that can be exploited by clinicians. These models offer transparency in decision-making, allowing clinicians to understand reasons behind diagnostic decisions, which is critical for trust and adoption in medical settings. In addition, interpretable classification algorithms facilitate the identification of important behavioural features and patterns associated with ASD, enabling more accurate and explainable diagnoses. However, there is a scarcity of review papers focusing on interpretable classifiers for ASD detection from a behavioural perspective. Thereby this research aimed to conduct a recent review on rule-based classification research works in order to provide added value by consolidating current research, identifying gaps, and guiding future studies. Our research would enhance the understanding of these techniques, based on data used to generate models and obtain performance by trying to highlight early detection and intervention ways for ASD. Integrating advanced AI methods like deep learning with rule-based classifiers can improve model interpretability, exploration, and accuracy in ASD-detection applications. While this hybrid approach has feature selection relevant features that can be detected in an efficient manner, rule-based classifiers can provide clinicians with transparent explanations for model decisions. This hybrid approach is critical in clinical applications like ASD, where model content is as crucial as achieving high classification accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Autism Data Classification Using AI Algorithms with Rules: Focused Review.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents challenges in early screening due to its varied nature and sophisticated early signs. From a machine-learning (ML) perspective, the primary challenges include the need for large, diverse datasets, managing the variability in ASD symptoms, providing easy-to-understand models, and ensuring ASD predictive models that can be employed across different populations. Interpretable or explainable classification algorithms, like rule-based or decision tree, play a crucial role in dealing with some of these issues by offering classification models that can be exploited by clinicians. These models offer transparency in decision-making, allowing clinicians to understand reasons behind diagnostic decisions, which is critical for trust and adoption in medical settings. In addition, interpretable classification algorithms facilitate the identification of important behavioural features and patterns associated with ASD, enabling more accurate and explainable diagnoses. However, there is a scarcity of review papers focusing on interpretable classifiers for ASD detection from a behavioural perspective. Thereby this research aimed to conduct a recent review on rule-based classification research works in order to provide added value by consolidating current research, identifying gaps, and guiding future studies. Our research would enhance the understanding of these techniques, based on data used to generate models and obtain performance by trying to highlight early detection and intervention ways for ASD. Integrating advanced AI methods like deep learning with rule-based classifiers can improve model interpretability, exploration, and accuracy in ASD-detection applications. While this hybrid approach has feature selection relevant features that can be detected in an efficient manner, rule-based classifiers can provide clinicians with transparent explanations for model decisions. This hybrid approach is critical in clinical applications like ASD, where model content is as crucial as achieving high classification accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering