小学体育中人工智能赋权的悖论:为什么技术可能会阻碍而不是帮助教学效率。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/bs15020240
Haoran Zha, Wenye Li, Weihao Wang, Jian Xiao
{"title":"小学体育中人工智能赋权的悖论:为什么技术可能会阻碍而不是帮助教学效率。","authors":"Haoran Zha, Wenye Li, Weihao Wang, Jian Xiao","doi":"10.3390/bs15020240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates why artificial intelligence (AI) may hinder rather than enhance teaching efficiency in primary school physical education (PE). Guided by socio-technical systems theory, we conducted focus group interviews with 13 PE teachers (6 from Nanjing and 7 from Chongqing, China) who had at least three years of teaching experience and two years of AI implementation experience. Participants were purposefully selected through a two-stage sampling strategy: initial screening via open-ended questionnaires to identify teachers reporting negative experiences with AI integration, followed by snowball sampling to recruit additional participants with similar perspectives. Data collection employed a dual-facilitator approach using semi-structured interviews, with one moderator guiding discussions while another observed non-verbal cues. Qualitative content analysis revealed key barriers across four dimensions: technological (interface complexity, infrastructure limitations), employee (professional identity conflicts, interpersonal tensions), task-related (real-time monitoring challenges, reduced pedagogical flexibility), and organizational (inadequate support systems, unclear implementation policies). These findings suggest that successful AI integration in PE requires a holistic approach addressing both technological and human factors, rather than focusing solely on technological advancement. The study contributes to understanding how socio-technical interactions uniquely manifest in physically active learning environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of AI Empowerment in Primary School Physical Education: Why Technology May Hinder, Not Help, Teaching Efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Haoran Zha, Wenye Li, Weihao Wang, Jian Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bs15020240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates why artificial intelligence (AI) may hinder rather than enhance teaching efficiency in primary school physical education (PE). Guided by socio-technical systems theory, we conducted focus group interviews with 13 PE teachers (6 from Nanjing and 7 from Chongqing, China) who had at least three years of teaching experience and two years of AI implementation experience. Participants were purposefully selected through a two-stage sampling strategy: initial screening via open-ended questionnaires to identify teachers reporting negative experiences with AI integration, followed by snowball sampling to recruit additional participants with similar perspectives. Data collection employed a dual-facilitator approach using semi-structured interviews, with one moderator guiding discussions while another observed non-verbal cues. Qualitative content analysis revealed key barriers across four dimensions: technological (interface complexity, infrastructure limitations), employee (professional identity conflicts, interpersonal tensions), task-related (real-time monitoring challenges, reduced pedagogical flexibility), and organizational (inadequate support systems, unclear implementation policies). These findings suggest that successful AI integration in PE requires a holistic approach addressing both technological and human factors, rather than focusing solely on technological advancement. The study contributes to understanding how socio-technical interactions uniquely manifest in physically active learning environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020240\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨为何人工智能(AI)会阻碍而非提高小学体育教学效率。在社会技术系统理论的指导下,我们对13名体育教师(6名来自南京,7名来自中国重庆)进行了焦点小组访谈,他们至少有三年的教学经验和两年的人工智能实施经验。参与者是通过两阶段抽样策略有目的地选择的:通过开放式问卷进行初步筛选,以确定报告人工智能整合负面经历的教师,然后进行滚雪球抽样,以招募具有类似观点的其他参与者。数据收集采用半结构化访谈的双重促进者方法,由一位主持人指导讨论,而另一位主持人观察非语言线索。定性内容分析揭示了四个维度的主要障碍:技术(界面复杂性、基础设施限制)、员工(职业身份冲突、人际关系紧张)、任务相关(实时监控挑战、教学灵活性降低)和组织(支持系统不足、实施政策不明确)。这些发现表明,人工智能在体育教学中的成功整合需要一种解决技术和人为因素的整体方法,而不是仅仅关注技术进步。该研究有助于理解社会技术互动如何独特地体现在身体活跃的学习环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Paradox of AI Empowerment in Primary School Physical Education: Why Technology May Hinder, Not Help, Teaching Efficiency.

This study investigates why artificial intelligence (AI) may hinder rather than enhance teaching efficiency in primary school physical education (PE). Guided by socio-technical systems theory, we conducted focus group interviews with 13 PE teachers (6 from Nanjing and 7 from Chongqing, China) who had at least three years of teaching experience and two years of AI implementation experience. Participants were purposefully selected through a two-stage sampling strategy: initial screening via open-ended questionnaires to identify teachers reporting negative experiences with AI integration, followed by snowball sampling to recruit additional participants with similar perspectives. Data collection employed a dual-facilitator approach using semi-structured interviews, with one moderator guiding discussions while another observed non-verbal cues. Qualitative content analysis revealed key barriers across four dimensions: technological (interface complexity, infrastructure limitations), employee (professional identity conflicts, interpersonal tensions), task-related (real-time monitoring challenges, reduced pedagogical flexibility), and organizational (inadequate support systems, unclear implementation policies). These findings suggest that successful AI integration in PE requires a holistic approach addressing both technological and human factors, rather than focusing solely on technological advancement. The study contributes to understanding how socio-technical interactions uniquely manifest in physically active learning environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding How Athletes Manage Uncertainty in Sport. "No Fair!": Children's Perceptions of Fairness in Merit-Based Distributions. Incorporating the Psychological Perspective into Traditional Prevention in Pediatric Dentistry with the PaFein+ Project: Trained Parents Can Help. Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Luxembourg Workplace Mobbing Scale (LWMS): Structural Equation Modeling, and Item Response Theory Evidence. Social Transformation in Environmental Awareness: The Role of Hospital Employees in the Transformation Process-Results of a Survey in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1