以活动为基础的干预措施对改善脊髓损伤患者独立性和活动能力的有效性:一项荟萃分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2025.2468346
Binglun Li, Qiong Wu, Hui Tan, Tao Wu, Yanchao Cui
{"title":"以活动为基础的干预措施对改善脊髓损伤患者独立性和活动能力的有效性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Binglun Li, Qiong Wu, Hui Tan, Tao Wu, Yanchao Cui","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2468346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to further investigate the effectiveness of activity-based interventions (ABI) for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in eight electronic databases up to 1 January, 2024. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or MD with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to express the estimates of the effectiveness of ABI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, ABI for lower limbs does not significantly improve independence, but it does improve mobility; however, ABI for upper limbs significantly improve independence and mobility. In the intermediate SCI subgroup, the ABI group suggested significant improvement in functional independence and mobility. In the chronic SCI subgroup, the ABI group did not show improvement in independence, but it suggested significant improvement in mobility. Nevertheless, the ABI group did not show statistically significant differences for independence and mobility in the acute SCI subgroup. Moreover, the application of ABI was not associated with an improvement in quality of life but significantly improved 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) and 10-meter walk test (10MWT). Except for ABI for lower limbs for independence, meta-analyses for the remaining outcomes were free of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of ABI may benefit SCI individuals by improving independence, mobility, 6MWT, and 10MWT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"4904-4912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of activity-based interventions for improving independence and mobility in spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Binglun Li, Qiong Wu, Hui Tan, Tao Wu, Yanchao Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2468346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to further investigate the effectiveness of activity-based interventions (ABI) for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in eight electronic databases up to 1 January, 2024. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or MD with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to express the estimates of the effectiveness of ABI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, ABI for lower limbs does not significantly improve independence, but it does improve mobility; however, ABI for upper limbs significantly improve independence and mobility. In the intermediate SCI subgroup, the ABI group suggested significant improvement in functional independence and mobility. In the chronic SCI subgroup, the ABI group did not show improvement in independence, but it suggested significant improvement in mobility. Nevertheless, the ABI group did not show statistically significant differences for independence and mobility in the acute SCI subgroup. Moreover, the application of ABI was not associated with an improvement in quality of life but significantly improved 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) and 10-meter walk test (10MWT). Except for ABI for lower limbs for independence, meta-analyses for the remaining outcomes were free of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of ABI may benefit SCI individuals by improving independence, mobility, 6MWT, and 10MWT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4904-4912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2468346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2468346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在进一步探讨基于活动的干预(ABI)对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的有效性。材料与方法:系统检索截至2024年1月1日的8个电子数据库的文献。使用95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)或MD来表示ABI有效性的估计。结果:与对照组相比,ABI对下肢独立性没有显著改善,但对活动能力有明显改善;然而,上肢ABI可显著改善独立性和活动能力。在中度SCI亚组中,ABI组在功能独立性和活动能力方面有显著改善。在慢性SCI亚组中,ABI组在独立性方面没有改善,但在活动能力方面有显著改善。然而,ABI组在急性SCI亚组的独立性和活动能力方面没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,ABI的应用与生活质量的改善无关,但显著改善了6分钟步行测试(6-MWT)和10米步行测试(10MWT)。除了下肢独立ABI外,其他meta分析结果均无发表偏倚。结论:应用ABI可改善脊髓损伤患者的独立性、活动性、6MWT和10MWT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of activity-based interventions for improving independence and mobility in spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to further investigate the effectiveness of activity-based interventions (ABI) for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in eight electronic databases up to 1 January, 2024. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or MD with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to express the estimates of the effectiveness of ABI.

Results: Compared to controls, ABI for lower limbs does not significantly improve independence, but it does improve mobility; however, ABI for upper limbs significantly improve independence and mobility. In the intermediate SCI subgroup, the ABI group suggested significant improvement in functional independence and mobility. In the chronic SCI subgroup, the ABI group did not show improvement in independence, but it suggested significant improvement in mobility. Nevertheless, the ABI group did not show statistically significant differences for independence and mobility in the acute SCI subgroup. Moreover, the application of ABI was not associated with an improvement in quality of life but significantly improved 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) and 10-meter walk test (10MWT). Except for ABI for lower limbs for independence, meta-analyses for the remaining outcomes were free of publication bias.

Conclusions: Application of ABI may benefit SCI individuals by improving independence, mobility, 6MWT, and 10MWT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Families experiences in seeking rehabilitation care for their children with disabilities in Northern Ghana: a qualitative study. Exploring the perceptions, barriers, and enablers of physical activity for people with younger onset dementia and care partners through thematic analysis. A qualitative study of traumatic cauda equina syndrome. Embracing risk, enhancing autonomy, and accelerating recovery: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Therapeutic Falls pathway. "Roll for intervention:" a (crit)ical look at the feasibility of online table-top role-playing games as group therapy for acquired brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1