提高矿山安全,减少温室气体排放:煤层气联产流体运移动力学综合分析

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2025.106933
Li Jia , Liang Wang , Yuanping Cheng , Jiang Xu , Baisheng Nie , Shoujian Peng
{"title":"提高矿山安全,减少温室气体排放:煤层气联产流体运移动力学综合分析","authors":"Li Jia ,&nbsp;Liang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuanping Cheng ,&nbsp;Jiang Xu ,&nbsp;Baisheng Nie ,&nbsp;Shoujian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coalbed methane (CBM) production confers a range of advantages such as improving coal mine safety, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying the energy portfolio, and advancing towards carbon peak and neutrality targets. Understanding and delineating the migration patterns of CBM during the production process are crucial for ensuring process safety and environmental protection. This study employed a comprehensive research approach involving physical simulation experiments, mathematical modeling, and numerical simulations to investigate the reservoir-wellbore coupling control mechanism of gas migration during the coproduction of multiple thin coal seams. The results revealed that the gas pressure exhibits stage-wise response characteristics, with the low-pressure reservoirs showing a more pronounced evolution pattern. Increasing the wellbore pressure reduced the resistance to gas pressure expansion, weakened fluid disturbance effects, and led to a significant pressure drawdown funnel. Conversely, decreasing the wellbore pressure intensifies fluid disturbances, making pressure drawdown expansion more challenging and resulting in poor compatibility for co-production CBM. Based on the “dual-pore single-permeability” reservoir gas flow model, a mathematical model for reservoir-wellbore coupling control of fluid migration was established. When the wellbore pressure was relatively low, fluids in low-pressure reservoirs migrated from the coal seam center to the deeper parts, exhibiting centrifugal flow patterns, while the fluid migration in the wellbore was in the opposite direction. In high-pressure reservoirs, fluid migration patterns were centripetal, and the flow in the wellbore was in the same direction, prone to forming congestion effects. Increasing the wellbore pressure facilitates the migration and production of CBM, while decreasing the pressure amplifies the reservoir-wellbore property differences, which was detrimental to CBM production. This research elucidated the migration laws of CBM involving “desorption, diffusion, seepage, and fluid interference”. The findings aimed to provide theoretical guidance for reducing fluid disturbance and enhancing the efficient production of CBM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106933"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing mine safety and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: A comprehensive analysis of fluid migration dynamics in coalbed methane co-production\",\"authors\":\"Li Jia ,&nbsp;Liang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuanping Cheng ,&nbsp;Jiang Xu ,&nbsp;Baisheng Nie ,&nbsp;Shoujian Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coalbed methane (CBM) production confers a range of advantages such as improving coal mine safety, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying the energy portfolio, and advancing towards carbon peak and neutrality targets. Understanding and delineating the migration patterns of CBM during the production process are crucial for ensuring process safety and environmental protection. This study employed a comprehensive research approach involving physical simulation experiments, mathematical modeling, and numerical simulations to investigate the reservoir-wellbore coupling control mechanism of gas migration during the coproduction of multiple thin coal seams. The results revealed that the gas pressure exhibits stage-wise response characteristics, with the low-pressure reservoirs showing a more pronounced evolution pattern. Increasing the wellbore pressure reduced the resistance to gas pressure expansion, weakened fluid disturbance effects, and led to a significant pressure drawdown funnel. Conversely, decreasing the wellbore pressure intensifies fluid disturbances, making pressure drawdown expansion more challenging and resulting in poor compatibility for co-production CBM. Based on the “dual-pore single-permeability” reservoir gas flow model, a mathematical model for reservoir-wellbore coupling control of fluid migration was established. When the wellbore pressure was relatively low, fluids in low-pressure reservoirs migrated from the coal seam center to the deeper parts, exhibiting centrifugal flow patterns, while the fluid migration in the wellbore was in the opposite direction. In high-pressure reservoirs, fluid migration patterns were centripetal, and the flow in the wellbore was in the same direction, prone to forming congestion effects. Increasing the wellbore pressure facilitates the migration and production of CBM, while decreasing the pressure amplifies the reservoir-wellbore property differences, which was detrimental to CBM production. This research elucidated the migration laws of CBM involving “desorption, diffusion, seepage, and fluid interference”. The findings aimed to provide theoretical guidance for reducing fluid disturbance and enhancing the efficient production of CBM.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025002009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025002009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

煤层气(CBM)生产具有一系列优势,如提高煤矿安全,减少温室气体排放,使能源组合多样化,以及向碳峰值和中和目标迈进。了解和描述煤层气在生产过程中的运移规律对确保生产过程安全和环境保护至关重要。本研究采用物理模拟实验、数学建模和数值模拟相结合的综合研究方法,对多薄煤层联产过程中气藏-井筒耦合控制运移机理进行了研究。结果表明:天然气压力具有阶段性响应特征,其中低压储层的演化模式更为明显;增加井筒压力降低了对气体压力膨胀的阻力,减弱了流体扰动效应,导致了明显的压降漏斗。相反,降低井筒压力会加剧流体扰动,使压降扩展更具挑战性,导致煤层气的相容性较差。以“双孔单渗”储层气体流动模型为基础,建立了储层-井筒耦合控制流体运移的数学模型。当井筒压力较低时,低压储层流体从煤层中心向深部运移,表现为离心式流动,而井筒内流体运移方向相反。在高压储层中,流体运移模式向心,井筒内流动方向相同,容易形成堵塞效应。提高井筒压力有利于煤层气的运移和开采,而降低压力则会放大储层-井筒物性差异,不利于煤层气的开采。研究阐明了煤层气的“解吸、扩散、渗流、流体干涉”运移规律。研究结果旨在为减少流体扰动,提高煤层气的高效开采提供理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing mine safety and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: A comprehensive analysis of fluid migration dynamics in coalbed methane co-production
Coalbed methane (CBM) production confers a range of advantages such as improving coal mine safety, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying the energy portfolio, and advancing towards carbon peak and neutrality targets. Understanding and delineating the migration patterns of CBM during the production process are crucial for ensuring process safety and environmental protection. This study employed a comprehensive research approach involving physical simulation experiments, mathematical modeling, and numerical simulations to investigate the reservoir-wellbore coupling control mechanism of gas migration during the coproduction of multiple thin coal seams. The results revealed that the gas pressure exhibits stage-wise response characteristics, with the low-pressure reservoirs showing a more pronounced evolution pattern. Increasing the wellbore pressure reduced the resistance to gas pressure expansion, weakened fluid disturbance effects, and led to a significant pressure drawdown funnel. Conversely, decreasing the wellbore pressure intensifies fluid disturbances, making pressure drawdown expansion more challenging and resulting in poor compatibility for co-production CBM. Based on the “dual-pore single-permeability” reservoir gas flow model, a mathematical model for reservoir-wellbore coupling control of fluid migration was established. When the wellbore pressure was relatively low, fluids in low-pressure reservoirs migrated from the coal seam center to the deeper parts, exhibiting centrifugal flow patterns, while the fluid migration in the wellbore was in the opposite direction. In high-pressure reservoirs, fluid migration patterns were centripetal, and the flow in the wellbore was in the same direction, prone to forming congestion effects. Increasing the wellbore pressure facilitates the migration and production of CBM, while decreasing the pressure amplifies the reservoir-wellbore property differences, which was detrimental to CBM production. This research elucidated the migration laws of CBM involving “desorption, diffusion, seepage, and fluid interference”. The findings aimed to provide theoretical guidance for reducing fluid disturbance and enhancing the efficient production of CBM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
The dynamic mechanism and enhancement effect of carboxymethyl cellulose foam dust suppression: Experimental and simulation evaluation Fate of lignocellulosic biomass during pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of lignin-rich cattle manure New Insights into the multifunctional mechanisms of polyaniline/Fe₃O₄-biochar in anaerobic co-digestion: Electron shuttling, microbial community succession, and metabolic regulation Heterogeneous Fenton oxidation assisted by zero-valent iron for on-demand pretreatment of extreme furfural spills Microplastics spatio-temporal distribution and ecological risks in the surface water of the Liao River, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1