基于P2P能源交易的本地能源市场内部定价方法

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101673
Mohammad Hasan Ghodusinejad , Hossein Yousefi , Behnam Mohammadi-ivatloo
{"title":"基于P2P能源交易的本地能源市场内部定价方法","authors":"Mohammad Hasan Ghodusinejad ,&nbsp;Hossein Yousefi ,&nbsp;Behnam Mohammadi-ivatloo","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Through facilitating direct energy transfer between producers and consumers and lowering intermediary expenses, peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading presents notable advantages for individual prosumers. Moreover, peer-to-peer trading permits proactive consumers to economically conduct their energy transactions, taking advantage of an equitable pricing mechanism within microgrids. In this study, an internal pricing model in a market integrated with P2P energy trading has been proposed. In this regard, in the first step, the market structure consisting of three blocks of members was modeled: block A including prosumers with photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage, block B with prosumers only equipped with PV systems, and finally block C including energy consumers. Market members manage P2P energy trade through a Local Market Organizer (LMO). Besides, in the second step, an energy pricing model is proposed in the P2P market based on the supply-demand ratio (SDR). The problem was implemented and solved in the form of a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model in GAMS, where its final goal was to minimize the total costs of the market members. The results showed that by switching from peer-to-grid (P2G) to P2P mode, the cost of peers decreased around 8 % in summer day and almost 2 % in winter day. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed pricing method was validated with a typical pricing method. So that the difference of the objective function values in two pricing methods was only 0.26 and 0.09 % in summer and winter day, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101673"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An internal pricing method for a local energy market with P2P energy trading\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hasan Ghodusinejad ,&nbsp;Hossein Yousefi ,&nbsp;Behnam Mohammadi-ivatloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Through facilitating direct energy transfer between producers and consumers and lowering intermediary expenses, peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading presents notable advantages for individual prosumers. Moreover, peer-to-peer trading permits proactive consumers to economically conduct their energy transactions, taking advantage of an equitable pricing mechanism within microgrids. In this study, an internal pricing model in a market integrated with P2P energy trading has been proposed. In this regard, in the first step, the market structure consisting of three blocks of members was modeled: block A including prosumers with photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage, block B with prosumers only equipped with PV systems, and finally block C including energy consumers. Market members manage P2P energy trade through a Local Market Organizer (LMO). Besides, in the second step, an energy pricing model is proposed in the P2P market based on the supply-demand ratio (SDR). The problem was implemented and solved in the form of a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model in GAMS, where its final goal was to minimize the total costs of the market members. The results showed that by switching from peer-to-grid (P2G) to P2P mode, the cost of peers decreased around 8 % in summer day and almost 2 % in winter day. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed pricing method was validated with a typical pricing method. So that the difference of the objective function values in two pricing methods was only 0.26 and 0.09 % in summer and winter day, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过促进生产者和消费者之间的直接能源转移和降低中间费用,P2P能源交易对个人生产消费者具有显著的优势。此外,点对点交易允许主动消费者利用微电网内的公平定价机制,以经济方式进行能源交易。本文提出了一个整合P2P能源交易的市场内部定价模型。为此,在第一步中,建模了由三个区块成员组成的市场结构:A区块包含拥有光伏和储能的产消者,B区块包含仅配备光伏系统的产消者,最后是包含能源消费者的C区块。市场成员通过本地市场组织者(LMO)管理P2P能源交易。其次,提出了基于供需比(SDR)的P2P市场能源定价模型。该问题以GAMS中的混合整数非线性规划(MINLP)模型的形式实现和解决,其最终目标是使市场成员的总成本最小化。结果表明,从P2G模式切换到P2P模式后,夏季和冬季的成本分别下降了约8%和近2%。通过典型定价方法验证了所提定价方法的准确性和鲁棒性。因此,两种定价方法的目标函数值在夏天和冬季的差异仅为0.26%和0.09%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An internal pricing method for a local energy market with P2P energy trading
Through facilitating direct energy transfer between producers and consumers and lowering intermediary expenses, peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading presents notable advantages for individual prosumers. Moreover, peer-to-peer trading permits proactive consumers to economically conduct their energy transactions, taking advantage of an equitable pricing mechanism within microgrids. In this study, an internal pricing model in a market integrated with P2P energy trading has been proposed. In this regard, in the first step, the market structure consisting of three blocks of members was modeled: block A including prosumers with photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage, block B with prosumers only equipped with PV systems, and finally block C including energy consumers. Market members manage P2P energy trade through a Local Market Organizer (LMO). Besides, in the second step, an energy pricing model is proposed in the P2P market based on the supply-demand ratio (SDR). The problem was implemented and solved in the form of a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model in GAMS, where its final goal was to minimize the total costs of the market members. The results showed that by switching from peer-to-grid (P2G) to P2P mode, the cost of peers decreased around 8 % in summer day and almost 2 % in winter day. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed pricing method was validated with a typical pricing method. So that the difference of the objective function values in two pricing methods was only 0.26 and 0.09 % in summer and winter day, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
Critical and bulk material considerations for designing low-carbon transport-energy pathways in Kenya Policy governance failures and institutional asymmetries shaping Global North-South energy transitions Digital-green integration and urban synergistic pollution and carbon reduction: Effects, mechanisms, and spatial spillovers Life cycle of lithium-ion battery recycling systems enable carbon capture, utilization, and storage: A review Life cycle emissions of electric, hydrogen, and fossil-fueled heavy-duty trucks: Trade-offs in CO2, CH4, and NOx reductions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1