基于ct的腹部放射治疗的经验与不确定性分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104946
J.V. Panetta, A. Eldib, J.E. Meyer, T.J. Galloway, E.M. Horwitz, C.M.C. Ma
{"title":"基于ct的腹部放射治疗的经验与不确定性分析","authors":"J.V. Panetta,&nbsp;A. Eldib,&nbsp;J.E. Meyer,&nbsp;T.J. Galloway,&nbsp;E.M. Horwitz,&nbsp;C.M.C. Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows for daily replanning of treatment plans with adjustments according to current day anatomy. The purpose of this work is to present our methodology for using CT-based ART applied to abdominal cases along with our experience with this treatment. We additionally aim to estimate some of the uncertainties associated with the adaptive process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Analysis was performed on patients with abdominal targets (N = 41, 205 fractions), treated on a CT-based adaptive treatment unit; treatment sites were divided into 3 categories: pancreas, liver, and other (e.g., lymph nodes). Statistics regarding contouring time, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing are presented. Contouring uncertainty was estimated by expanding critical OARs and recalculating dose, and auto-registration uncertainty was estimated by adjusting the registration between the cone beam computed tomography scan and the dose cloud and recalculating dose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Coverage for the planning optimization PTV (PTV_Opt) for adaptive plans was on average 94.7 ± 0.4 %, while for scheduled plans it was on average 92.0 ± 0.6 %. The average decrease in OAR maximum dose by using the adaptive plans was 11.6 ± 1.0 %. Contouring time was on average 23 ± 0 min. Uncertainty estimates for PTV V100% were on average 0.6 ± 0.4 %; combined uncertainties for maximum OAR dose were on average 4.6 ± 0.4 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adaptive therapy on average led to plans with improved PTV coverage or OAR sparing, and our workflow allowed for treatment to be completed within a reasonable timeframe. The benefit of adaptive therapy largely outweighed estimates of uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience and uncertainty analysis of CT-based adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal treatments\",\"authors\":\"J.V. Panetta,&nbsp;A. Eldib,&nbsp;J.E. Meyer,&nbsp;T.J. Galloway,&nbsp;E.M. Horwitz,&nbsp;C.M.C. Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows for daily replanning of treatment plans with adjustments according to current day anatomy. The purpose of this work is to present our methodology for using CT-based ART applied to abdominal cases along with our experience with this treatment. We additionally aim to estimate some of the uncertainties associated with the adaptive process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Analysis was performed on patients with abdominal targets (N = 41, 205 fractions), treated on a CT-based adaptive treatment unit; treatment sites were divided into 3 categories: pancreas, liver, and other (e.g., lymph nodes). Statistics regarding contouring time, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing are presented. Contouring uncertainty was estimated by expanding critical OARs and recalculating dose, and auto-registration uncertainty was estimated by adjusting the registration between the cone beam computed tomography scan and the dose cloud and recalculating dose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Coverage for the planning optimization PTV (PTV_Opt) for adaptive plans was on average 94.7 ± 0.4 %, while for scheduled plans it was on average 92.0 ± 0.6 %. The average decrease in OAR maximum dose by using the adaptive plans was 11.6 ± 1.0 %. Contouring time was on average 23 ± 0 min. Uncertainty estimates for PTV V100% were on average 0.6 ± 0.4 %; combined uncertainties for maximum OAR dose were on average 4.6 ± 0.4 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adaptive therapy on average led to plans with improved PTV coverage or OAR sparing, and our workflow allowed for treatment to be completed within a reasonable timeframe. The benefit of adaptive therapy largely outweighed estimates of uncertainty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:线上自适应放射治疗(ART)允许每日重新规划治疗计划,并根据当前解剖结构进行调整。这项工作的目的是介绍我们将基于ct的ART应用于腹部病例的方法以及我们在这种治疗方面的经验。我们还旨在估计与自适应过程相关的一些不确定性。方法与材料采用基于ct的适应性治疗单元治疗的腹部靶患者(N = 41, 205个分数);治疗部位分为胰腺、肝脏和其他(如淋巴结)3类。统计关于轮廓时间,规划目标体积(PTV)覆盖,和器官在风险(OAR)节约提出。通过扩大临界桨和重新计算剂量来估计轮廓不确定度,通过调整锥束ct扫描与剂量云的配准和重新计算剂量来估计自动配准不确定度。结果自适应方案的规划优化PTV (PTV_Opt)覆盖率平均为94.7±0.4%,预定方案的规划优化PTV覆盖率平均为92.0±0.6%。采用自适应方案可使OAR最大剂量平均降低11.6±1.0%。轮廓时间平均为23±0分钟。PTV V100%的不确定度估计平均为0.6±0.4%;最大桨叶剂量的综合不确定度平均为4.6±0.4%。结论:适应性治疗总体上提高了PTV覆盖率或OAR节约,我们的工作流程允许在合理的时间内完成治疗。适应性治疗的益处在很大程度上超过了对不确定性的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience and uncertainty analysis of CT-based adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal treatments

Background

Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows for daily replanning of treatment plans with adjustments according to current day anatomy. The purpose of this work is to present our methodology for using CT-based ART applied to abdominal cases along with our experience with this treatment. We additionally aim to estimate some of the uncertainties associated with the adaptive process.

Methods and Materials

Analysis was performed on patients with abdominal targets (N = 41, 205 fractions), treated on a CT-based adaptive treatment unit; treatment sites were divided into 3 categories: pancreas, liver, and other (e.g., lymph nodes). Statistics regarding contouring time, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing are presented. Contouring uncertainty was estimated by expanding critical OARs and recalculating dose, and auto-registration uncertainty was estimated by adjusting the registration between the cone beam computed tomography scan and the dose cloud and recalculating dose.

Results

Coverage for the planning optimization PTV (PTV_Opt) for adaptive plans was on average 94.7 ± 0.4 %, while for scheduled plans it was on average 92.0 ± 0.6 %. The average decrease in OAR maximum dose by using the adaptive plans was 11.6 ± 1.0 %. Contouring time was on average 23 ± 0 min. Uncertainty estimates for PTV V100% were on average 0.6 ± 0.4 %; combined uncertainties for maximum OAR dose were on average 4.6 ± 0.4 %.

Conclusion

Adaptive therapy on average led to plans with improved PTV coverage or OAR sparing, and our workflow allowed for treatment to be completed within a reasonable timeframe. The benefit of adaptive therapy largely outweighed estimates of uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Impact of sensitive volume dimensions on microdosimetric measurements of radiation quality for proton therapy Comprehensive framework for evaluation of deep neural networks in detection and quantification of lymphoma from PET/CT images: Clinical insights, pitfalls, and observer agreement analyses Survey evidence demands professional guidance on large language model use in medical physics Occupational radiation doses in CT-guided interventions: A multicentre evaluation with special emphasis on lung biopsies and eye lens doses Neural network-based tissue attenuation correction in dual-band cherenkov imaging for dose distribution verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1