验证土耳其版本的团队学习评估量表:心理测量学评价。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06893-6
Sevim Şen Olgay, Şevval Çağan Kişin
{"title":"验证土耳其版本的团队学习评估量表:心理测量学评价。","authors":"Sevim Şen Olgay, Şevval Çağan Kişin","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06893-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning methods enhance course achievement, student success, and student satisfaction and are frequently used in nursing curricula. However, there is no valid and reliable tool for evaluating team-based learning in Türkiye. Adapting the Team-based Learning Student Assessment (TBL-SAI) into Turkish can provide a standardized and culturally appropriate evaluation tool, supporting nursing education practice and research. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the assessment (TBL-SAI-TR) among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and psychometrics study was conducted between October and November 2022. The sample consisted of 430 nursing students. The translation-back-translation method was used to determine the language accuracy of the scale. The content validity, construct validity, item analysis, and internal consistency analysis were used as psychometrics tests of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α value of the TBL-SAI-TR was .90. The item-total correlations of the 23-item three-factor scale, validated by confirmatory factor analysis, were between .30 and .74, and the intraclass correlations were between .88 and .90.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the TBL-SAI-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing team-based learning among Turkish nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Turkish version of the team-based learning assessment scale: a psychometric evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Sevim Şen Olgay, Şevval Çağan Kişin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-06893-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning methods enhance course achievement, student success, and student satisfaction and are frequently used in nursing curricula. However, there is no valid and reliable tool for evaluating team-based learning in Türkiye. Adapting the Team-based Learning Student Assessment (TBL-SAI) into Turkish can provide a standardized and culturally appropriate evaluation tool, supporting nursing education practice and research. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the assessment (TBL-SAI-TR) among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and psychometrics study was conducted between October and November 2022. The sample consisted of 430 nursing students. The translation-back-translation method was used to determine the language accuracy of the scale. The content validity, construct validity, item analysis, and internal consistency analysis were used as psychometrics tests of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α value of the TBL-SAI-TR was .90. The item-total correlations of the 23-item three-factor scale, validated by confirmatory factor analysis, were between .30 and .74, and the intraclass correlations were between .88 and .90.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the TBL-SAI-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing team-based learning among Turkish nursing students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06893-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06893-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以团队为基础的学习方法可以提高课程成绩、学生成功和学生满意度,并经常用于护理课程。然而,没有有效和可靠的工具来评估 rkiye中基于团队的学习。将以团队为基础的学生学习评估(TBL-SAI)调整为土耳其语,可以提供标准化和适合文化的评估工具,支持护理教育实践和研究。本研究旨在评估土耳其语版评估(TBL-SAI-TR)在护生中的效度和信度。方法:这项描述性和心理测量学研究于2022年10月至11月进行。样本包括430名护理专业学生。采用翻译-反翻译法确定量表的语言准确性。采用内容效度、结构效度、项目分析和内部一致性分析作为本研究的心理测量学检验。结果:TBL-SAI-TR的Cronbach's α值为0.90。经验证性因子分析,23项三因子量表的项目-总相关在0.30 ~ 0.74之间,类内相关在0.88 ~ 0.90之间。结论:本研究表明TBL-SAI-TR是评估土耳其护理专业学生团队学习的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validating the Turkish version of the team-based learning assessment scale: a psychometric evaluation.

Background: Team-based learning methods enhance course achievement, student success, and student satisfaction and are frequently used in nursing curricula. However, there is no valid and reliable tool for evaluating team-based learning in Türkiye. Adapting the Team-based Learning Student Assessment (TBL-SAI) into Turkish can provide a standardized and culturally appropriate evaluation tool, supporting nursing education practice and research. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the assessment (TBL-SAI-TR) among nursing students.

Methods: This descriptive and psychometrics study was conducted between October and November 2022. The sample consisted of 430 nursing students. The translation-back-translation method was used to determine the language accuracy of the scale. The content validity, construct validity, item analysis, and internal consistency analysis were used as psychometrics tests of the study.

Results: The Cronbach's α value of the TBL-SAI-TR was .90. The item-total correlations of the 23-item three-factor scale, validated by confirmatory factor analysis, were between .30 and .74, and the intraclass correlations were between .88 and .90.

Conclusion: This study showed that the TBL-SAI-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing team-based learning among Turkish nursing students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Scientific education in German medical schools: nationwide cross-sectional study reveals student needs and gaps. Stress and resilience among first-year medical students: a cross-sectional application of the medical student stress scale. Beyond the formal curriculum: unveiling the pathway from hidden curriculum to professional identity through learning engagement in nursing education. Evaluation of mobbing experiences among family medicine residents. Nursing faculty perceptions of soft skills teaching in undergraduate nursing education: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1