公平使用干预疼痛和抑郁(EQUIPD):一项试点随机试验。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105353
Marianne S. Matthias Ph.D. , Diana J. Burgess Ph.D. , Joanne K. Daggy Ph.D. , Claire E. Donnelly M.A. , Perla Flores B.S. , Nicole R. Fowler Ph.D., M.H.S.A. , Jennifer Garabrant B.S.W. , Nancy Henry B.A. , Stephen G. Henry M.D. , Monica Huffman B.S. , Pavani Jyothi Kavuri M.S. , Susan Ofner M.S. , Canaan Perry B.S. , Kevin L. Rand Ph.D. , Maria Robles M.D. , Michelle P. Salyers Ph.D. , Stephanie L. Taylor Ph.D. , Adam T. Hirsh Ph.D.
{"title":"公平使用干预疼痛和抑郁(EQUIPD):一项试点随机试验。","authors":"Marianne S. Matthias Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Diana J. Burgess Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joanne K. Daggy Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Claire E. Donnelly M.A. ,&nbsp;Perla Flores B.S. ,&nbsp;Nicole R. Fowler Ph.D., M.H.S.A. ,&nbsp;Jennifer Garabrant B.S.W. ,&nbsp;Nancy Henry B.A. ,&nbsp;Stephen G. Henry M.D. ,&nbsp;Monica Huffman B.S. ,&nbsp;Pavani Jyothi Kavuri M.S. ,&nbsp;Susan Ofner M.S. ,&nbsp;Canaan Perry B.S. ,&nbsp;Kevin L. Rand Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maria Robles M.D. ,&nbsp;Michelle P. Salyers Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Taylor Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Adam T. Hirsh Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30–0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 105353"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD): A pilot randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Marianne S. Matthias Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Diana J. Burgess Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joanne K. Daggy Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Claire E. Donnelly M.A. ,&nbsp;Perla Flores B.S. ,&nbsp;Nicole R. Fowler Ph.D., M.H.S.A. ,&nbsp;Jennifer Garabrant B.S.W. ,&nbsp;Nancy Henry B.A. ,&nbsp;Stephen G. Henry M.D. ,&nbsp;Monica Huffman B.S. ,&nbsp;Pavani Jyothi Kavuri M.S. ,&nbsp;Susan Ofner M.S. ,&nbsp;Canaan Perry B.S. ,&nbsp;Kevin L. Rand Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maria Robles M.D. ,&nbsp;Michelle P. Salyers Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Taylor Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Adam T. Hirsh Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30–0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005802\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越多的人呼吁改善健康公平,黑人患者继续经历更严重的疼痛和相关的后果。黑人患者提供的疼痛治疗选择也比白人患者少,与临床医生的沟通质量也较差,包括参与共同决策的程度较低。共病性抑郁症状会妨碍有效的疼痛管理和参与决策。疼痛和抑郁干预的公平性NCT05695209)试点研究考察了一对一指导干预的可行性,并与决策辅助相结合,以促进对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和至少轻度抑郁症状的黑人患者进行循证非药物疼痛治疗的共同决策。我们以每月7.5人的速度随机招募30名参与者,3个月留存率为90%,6个月留存率为87%。干预的参与率很高,94%的参与者至少完成了4次辅导课程中的3次。保真度也很高。虽然没有得到有效性的支持,但大多数结果,包括疼痛干扰、抑郁、焦虑、患者参与和共同决策,都有所改善,有利于干预,3个月时的效应值在0.30-0.75之间。结果表明,EQUIPD有望作为一种干预措施,支持黑人慢性疼痛和抑郁症状升高患者的自主和共同决策。观点:EQUIPD干预,包括一对一的指导结合决策辅助,以增加非药物疼痛治疗的共同决策,是可行的,并显示出改善慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和抑郁症状黑人患者疼痛和相关结果的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD): A pilot randomized trial
Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30–0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms.

Perspective

The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Terminology and core components of co-design intervention in chronic pain management: An international Delphi study “A lot of bureaucracy”: Structural barriers to prescription opioids in cancer pain management Patients’ pain experience in claudication: Biopsychosocial correlates of frequency, intensity, sleep interference, and chronic pain Illuminating ongoing pain in mice with novel bioluminescent imaging New strategy for treating visceral pain: Enhancing opioid antinociception by Sigma-1 receptor inhibition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1