旅游对海洋和沿海生态系统服务的影响:系统综述

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100277
Eglė Baltranaitė , Miguel Inácio , Luís Valença Pinto , Katarzyna Bogdziewicz , Jorge Rocha , Eduardo Gomes , Paulo Pereira
{"title":"旅游对海洋和沿海生态系统服务的影响:系统综述","authors":"Eglė Baltranaitė ,&nbsp;Miguel Inácio ,&nbsp;Luís Valença Pinto ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Bogdziewicz ,&nbsp;Jorge Rocha ,&nbsp;Eduardo Gomes ,&nbsp;Paulo Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal tourism holds substantial development potential. However, coastal ecosystems are affected by tourism development, which limits the supply of ecosystem services (ES). This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review on the impacts of tourism on coastal and marine ES using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-alpha Methods. We initially identified 640 studies by searching titles, abstracts, and keywords. After screening, only 50 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The results showed a significant increase in publications between 2011 and 2023. Most studies were conducted in Europe, Asia, and North and Central America. The most used ES classifications were MEA and CICES. Most studies concentrated on the ES supply dimension (43 studies; 86 %). Cultural ES (47 studies; 94 %) were researched more than provisioning (28 studies; 56 %) and regulating &amp; maintenance (29 studies; 58 %) sections. Regarding cultural ES, most studies were focused on “<em>Physical and experiential interactions with the natural environment”</em> (34 studies; 68 %) and on provisioning ES on “<em>Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energy</em>” (18 studies; 36 %)<em>.</em> Quantitative and mixed methods were the most used in the reviewed studies. Most studies identified pressures from “<em>Tourism, urbanisation, and population increase</em>” (27 studies; 54 %) and focused on “<em>Integrative/ common management strategies</em>” (20 studies; 40 %). Only a few of the studies’ results have been validated by external data (10 studies; 20 %). This study provides an overview of the most assessed marine and coastal ES, where studies are needed with more comprehensive geographic coverage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tourism impacts on marine and coastal ecosystem services: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Eglė Baltranaitė ,&nbsp;Miguel Inácio ,&nbsp;Luís Valença Pinto ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Bogdziewicz ,&nbsp;Jorge Rocha ,&nbsp;Eduardo Gomes ,&nbsp;Paulo Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coastal tourism holds substantial development potential. However, coastal ecosystems are affected by tourism development, which limits the supply of ecosystem services (ES). This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review on the impacts of tourism on coastal and marine ES using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-alpha Methods. We initially identified 640 studies by searching titles, abstracts, and keywords. After screening, only 50 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The results showed a significant increase in publications between 2011 and 2023. Most studies were conducted in Europe, Asia, and North and Central America. The most used ES classifications were MEA and CICES. Most studies concentrated on the ES supply dimension (43 studies; 86 %). Cultural ES (47 studies; 94 %) were researched more than provisioning (28 studies; 56 %) and regulating &amp; maintenance (29 studies; 58 %) sections. Regarding cultural ES, most studies were focused on “<em>Physical and experiential interactions with the natural environment”</em> (34 studies; 68 %) and on provisioning ES on “<em>Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energy</em>” (18 studies; 36 %)<em>.</em> Quantitative and mixed methods were the most used in the reviewed studies. Most studies identified pressures from “<em>Tourism, urbanisation, and population increase</em>” (27 studies; 54 %) and focused on “<em>Integrative/ common management strategies</em>” (20 studies; 40 %). Only a few of the studies’ results have been validated by external data (10 studies; 20 %). This study provides an overview of the most assessed marine and coastal ES, where studies are needed with more comprehensive geographic coverage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geography and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geography and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683925000161\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683925000161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沿海旅游发展潜力巨大。然而,沿海生态系统受到旅游业发展的影响,限制了生态系统服务的供应。本研究旨在利用系统评价的首选报告项目和Meta-alpha方法对旅游对沿海和海洋生态系统的影响进行系统的文献综述。我们通过搜索标题、摘要和关键词,初步确定了640项研究。经过筛选,只有50项研究符合纳入本综述的标准。结果显示,2011年至2023年期间,论文发表量显著增加。大多数研究是在欧洲、亚洲、北美和中美洲进行的。最常用的ES分类是MEA和CICES。大多数研究集中在ES供应维度上(43项研究;86%)。文化ES(47项研究;94%)的研究超过了预期(28项研究;56%)和调节&;维持(29项研究;58%)节。关于文化ES,大多数研究集中在“与自然环境的物理和体验互动”(34项研究;68%),以及为“野生动物(陆生和水生)提供营养、材料或能源”(18项研究;36%)。在回顾的研究中,定量和混合方法使用最多。大多数研究确定了来自“旅游业、城市化和人口增长”的压力(27项研究;54%),并侧重于“综合/共同管理战略”(20项研究;40%)。只有少数研究的结果得到了外部数据的验证(10项研究;20%)。本研究概述了评估最多的海洋和沿海生态系统,这些研究需要更全面的地理覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tourism impacts on marine and coastal ecosystem services: A systematic review
Coastal tourism holds substantial development potential. However, coastal ecosystems are affected by tourism development, which limits the supply of ecosystem services (ES). This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review on the impacts of tourism on coastal and marine ES using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-alpha Methods. We initially identified 640 studies by searching titles, abstracts, and keywords. After screening, only 50 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The results showed a significant increase in publications between 2011 and 2023. Most studies were conducted in Europe, Asia, and North and Central America. The most used ES classifications were MEA and CICES. Most studies concentrated on the ES supply dimension (43 studies; 86 %). Cultural ES (47 studies; 94 %) were researched more than provisioning (28 studies; 56 %) and regulating & maintenance (29 studies; 58 %) sections. Regarding cultural ES, most studies were focused on “Physical and experiential interactions with the natural environment” (34 studies; 68 %) and on provisioning ES on “Wild animals (terrestrial and aquatic) for nutrition, materials or energy” (18 studies; 36 %). Quantitative and mixed methods were the most used in the reviewed studies. Most studies identified pressures from “Tourism, urbanisation, and population increase” (27 studies; 54 %) and focused on “Integrative/ common management strategies” (20 studies; 40 %). Only a few of the studies’ results have been validated by external data (10 studies; 20 %). This study provides an overview of the most assessed marine and coastal ES, where studies are needed with more comprehensive geographic coverage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Photovoltaic carbon reduction potential analysis and layout optimization coupling future development scenarios: A case study of Inner Mongolia, China Poleward expansion of human activities exacerbates Arctic ecological crisis Assessing the dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions and spatial inequalities to inform sustainable agricultural production Spillover effects of rural settlement-cropland symbiosis in rural China on the global grain trade Conservation deficits and climate-driven habitat shifts of threatened plants in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1