IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104490
Genevieve N. Healy , Alejandro Melendez-Calderon , Sami Kaab , Noah Bongers , Katherine A. Heseltine , Chan Hi Yue , George Thomas , Bronwyn K. Clark
{"title":"Development, validation, acceptability and usability of a device-based system to measure sit-stand desk usage","authors":"Genevieve N. Healy ,&nbsp;Alejandro Melendez-Calderon ,&nbsp;Sami Kaab ,&nbsp;Noah Bongers ,&nbsp;Katherine A. Heseltine ,&nbsp;Chan Hi Yue ,&nbsp;George Thomas ,&nbsp;Bronwyn K. Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We describe the development and testing (across three studies) of an open-source device designed to measure sit-stand desk usage: the Desk Positioning System (DPS). Accuracy of the DPS was assessed under prescribed (Study 1) and free-living (Study 2; video criterion) conditions, across multiple desk-types. Study 3 assessed usability and acceptability in the short-term (1-week) and longer-term (5-weeks).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In Study 1, the DPS was 100% accurate at identifying most conditions (presence at desk 59/72 conditions, detecting desk height 166/168). In Study 2 (n = 10) the DPS demonstrated high accuracy (F1&gt;0.95) and precision (&gt;0.98) against the criterion (7866 observations). Study 3 participants (n = 23) reported high device acceptability in both the short- (mean [sd] 4.4/5 [SD 0.4]) and longer-term (4.6/5 [0.5]). Usability was above the 68-score industry benchmark at the short- (72.4/100 [14.2]) and longer-term (74.7/100 [18.5]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The DPS may provide an accurate, acceptable and useable way of understanding sit-stand desk usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了一种用于测量坐立办公桌使用情况的开源设备--办公桌定位系统(DPS)的开发和测试(涉及三项研究)。在规定(研究 1)和自由生活(研究 2;视频标准)条件下,对 DPS 的准确性进行了评估,涉及多种办公桌类型。研究 3 对短期(1 周)和长期(5 周)的可用性和可接受性进行了评估。结果在研究 1 中,DPS 对大多数情况的识别准确率为 100%(在办公桌前 59/72 次,检测办公桌高度 166/168 次)。在研究 2(n = 10)中,DPS 的准确度(F1>0.95)和精确度(>0.98)均高于标准(7866 次观察)。研究 3 的参与者(n = 23)表示,设备在短期(平均值 [sd] 4.4/5 [SD 0.4])和长期(4.6/5 [0.5])的可接受性都很高。短期(72.4/100 [14.2])和长期(74.7/100 [18.5])可用性均高于 68 分的行业基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development, validation, acceptability and usability of a device-based system to measure sit-stand desk usage
We describe the development and testing (across three studies) of an open-source device designed to measure sit-stand desk usage: the Desk Positioning System (DPS). Accuracy of the DPS was assessed under prescribed (Study 1) and free-living (Study 2; video criterion) conditions, across multiple desk-types. Study 3 assessed usability and acceptability in the short-term (1-week) and longer-term (5-weeks).

Results

In Study 1, the DPS was 100% accurate at identifying most conditions (presence at desk 59/72 conditions, detecting desk height 166/168). In Study 2 (n = 10) the DPS demonstrated high accuracy (F1>0.95) and precision (>0.98) against the criterion (7866 observations). Study 3 participants (n = 23) reported high device acceptability in both the short- (mean [sd] 4.4/5 [SD 0.4]) and longer-term (4.6/5 [0.5]). Usability was above the 68-score industry benchmark at the short- (72.4/100 [14.2]) and longer-term (74.7/100 [18.5]).

Conclusion

The DPS may provide an accurate, acceptable and useable way of understanding sit-stand desk usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a comprehensive health promotion intervention for managing risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders in Iranian housewives: A four-arm randomized controlled trial Effects of DC-powered pistol grip tool location and orientation on operator upper extremity stiffness and damping Development, validation, acceptability and usability of a device-based system to measure sit-stand desk usage Editorial Board Dynamics of COVID-19 crisis management in hospitals and its long-term effects: An analysis using organizational resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1