混合动力有机朗肯蒸汽压缩系统的热力学和涡轮力学分析

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125554
Bennett Platt, Derek Young, Todd Bandhauer
{"title":"混合动力有机朗肯蒸汽压缩系统的热力学和涡轮力学分析","authors":"Bennett Platt,&nbsp;Derek Young,&nbsp;Todd Bandhauer","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermally activated chillers, like absorption and organic Rankine vapor compression (ORVC) systems, are solutions to improve efficiency and meet decarbonization goals in the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) industry. However, technical limitations prevent these chillers from providing steady cooling power under variable operating parameters. This work evaluated an electrified ORVC system that can address the limitations of thermally activated chillers, by utilizing both thermal and electric input. Three different configurations (one with parallel compressors and two with series compressors) were evaluated using coupled thermodynamic and turbomachinery analysis. The highest performing configuration (series with the thermal compressor first) was simulated at 175 kW scale under industry standard operating conditions, and across a range of parameter studies to characterize off design performance. Simulation results indicated efficient performance, with compression load being shifted between the thermally and electrically driven compressors. With the compression load balanced, the thermal COP was 0.69 and the electric COP was 10.1 at design conditions. Simulations showed a wide operating range, with acceptable heat input ranging from 100 kW – 327 kW in hybrid operation, in addition to purely electric or thermal operation. Parametric results also indicated large operating ranges for heat supply inlet temperature (85 °C – 117 °C), chilled water delivery temperature (2.1 °C – 10.7 °C), and heat rejection inlet temperature (26.6 °C – 30.9 °C). Turbomachinery analysis indicated a mismatch between the thermal and electric devices, which impacted the performance of the system. Simulations with a properly sized electric device increased the capacity to 268.3 kW, highlighting the importance of turbomachinery analysis for this technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 125554"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermodynamic and turbomachinery analysis of a hybrid electric organic Rankine vapor compression system\",\"authors\":\"Bennett Platt,&nbsp;Derek Young,&nbsp;Todd Bandhauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thermally activated chillers, like absorption and organic Rankine vapor compression (ORVC) systems, are solutions to improve efficiency and meet decarbonization goals in the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) industry. However, technical limitations prevent these chillers from providing steady cooling power under variable operating parameters. This work evaluated an electrified ORVC system that can address the limitations of thermally activated chillers, by utilizing both thermal and electric input. Three different configurations (one with parallel compressors and two with series compressors) were evaluated using coupled thermodynamic and turbomachinery analysis. The highest performing configuration (series with the thermal compressor first) was simulated at 175 kW scale under industry standard operating conditions, and across a range of parameter studies to characterize off design performance. Simulation results indicated efficient performance, with compression load being shifted between the thermally and electrically driven compressors. With the compression load balanced, the thermal COP was 0.69 and the electric COP was 10.1 at design conditions. Simulations showed a wide operating range, with acceptable heat input ranging from 100 kW – 327 kW in hybrid operation, in addition to purely electric or thermal operation. Parametric results also indicated large operating ranges for heat supply inlet temperature (85 °C – 117 °C), chilled water delivery temperature (2.1 °C – 10.7 °C), and heat rejection inlet temperature (26.6 °C – 30.9 °C). Turbomachinery analysis indicated a mismatch between the thermal and electric devices, which impacted the performance of the system. Simulations with a properly sized electric device increased the capacity to 268.3 kW, highlighting the importance of turbomachinery analysis for this technology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"387 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002843\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热激活冷却器,如吸收式和有机朗肯蒸汽压缩(ORVC)系统,是提高效率和满足供暖、通风和空调(HVAC)行业脱碳目标的解决方案。然而,技术限制使这些冷却器无法在可变操作参数下提供稳定的冷却功率。这项工作评估了一种电气化ORVC系统,该系统可以通过利用热电输入来解决热激活冷却器的局限性。通过热力学和涡轮力学的耦合分析,对三种不同的配置(一种并联压缩机和两种串联压缩机)进行了评估。在工业标准操作条件下,在175 kW的规模下模拟了最高性能配置(首先是热压缩机系列),并通过一系列参数研究来表征设计性能。仿真结果表明,压缩负荷在热驱动和电驱动压缩机之间转换,具有高效的性能。在压缩负荷平衡的情况下,设计工况下的热工比为0.69,电工比为10.1。模拟显示,除了纯电动或热操作外,混合操作的可接受热输入范围为100 kW - 327 kW。参数结果还表明,供热入口温度(85°C - 117°C)、冷冻水输送温度(2.1°C - 10.7°C)和散热入口温度(26.6°C - 30.9°C)的工作范围很大。涡轮机械分析表明,热电器件不匹配,影响了系统的性能。通过适当尺寸的电气装置进行模拟,将容量增加到268.3 kW,突出了涡轮机械分析对该技术的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thermodynamic and turbomachinery analysis of a hybrid electric organic Rankine vapor compression system
Thermally activated chillers, like absorption and organic Rankine vapor compression (ORVC) systems, are solutions to improve efficiency and meet decarbonization goals in the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) industry. However, technical limitations prevent these chillers from providing steady cooling power under variable operating parameters. This work evaluated an electrified ORVC system that can address the limitations of thermally activated chillers, by utilizing both thermal and electric input. Three different configurations (one with parallel compressors and two with series compressors) were evaluated using coupled thermodynamic and turbomachinery analysis. The highest performing configuration (series with the thermal compressor first) was simulated at 175 kW scale under industry standard operating conditions, and across a range of parameter studies to characterize off design performance. Simulation results indicated efficient performance, with compression load being shifted between the thermally and electrically driven compressors. With the compression load balanced, the thermal COP was 0.69 and the electric COP was 10.1 at design conditions. Simulations showed a wide operating range, with acceptable heat input ranging from 100 kW – 327 kW in hybrid operation, in addition to purely electric or thermal operation. Parametric results also indicated large operating ranges for heat supply inlet temperature (85 °C – 117 °C), chilled water delivery temperature (2.1 °C – 10.7 °C), and heat rejection inlet temperature (26.6 °C – 30.9 °C). Turbomachinery analysis indicated a mismatch between the thermal and electric devices, which impacted the performance of the system. Simulations with a properly sized electric device increased the capacity to 268.3 kW, highlighting the importance of turbomachinery analysis for this technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
A review of electrochemical process-driven recycling and regeneration technologies for lithium-ion batteries A curriculum-guided deep reinforcement learning framework for health-aware energy management of hybrid electric aircraft Physics-informed multi-gated convolutional recurrent network for extreme wind speed prediction A universal two-stage framework for gas diffusion layer reconstruction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Toward high-fidelity through-plane porosity distribution Renewable-colocated green hydrogen production: Optimal scheduling and profitability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1