致美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）心血管研究部门审查员的公开信。

IF 3.5 2区生物学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s11010-025-05230-1

Ali J Marian

{"title":"致美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）心血管研究部门审查员的公开信。","authors":"Ali J Marian","doi":"10.1007/s11010-025-05230-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reviewers who serve at the National Institute of Health (NIH) study sections are in the unique position of identifying the most scientifically meritorious grant applications for consideration for funding. Consequently, the reviewers guide the direction of scientific discoveries in the US, which ultimately translate to patient care. Recently many investigators have expressed concerns about the quality of the reviews that they received from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study section reviewers. I discuss some of these concerns, identify some of the deficiencies, and make suggestions to the reviewers on how to improve their review of the grant applications.","PeriodicalId":18724,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open letter to the NIH cardiovascular study section reviewers.\",\"authors\":\"Ali J Marian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11010-025-05230-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reviewers who serve at the National Institute of Health (NIH) study sections are in the unique position of identifying the most scientifically meritorious grant applications for consideration for funding. Consequently, the reviewers guide the direction of scientific discoveries in the US, which ultimately translate to patient care. Recently many investigators have expressed concerns about the quality of the reviews that they received from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study section reviewers. I discuss some of these concerns, identify some of the deficiencies, and make suggestions to the reviewers on how to improve their review of the grant applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-025-05230-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-025-05230-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）研究部门工作的评审员处于一个独特的位置，他们负责确定最有科学价值的拨款申请，以供考虑资助。因此，评审人员引导着美国科学发现的方向，并最终转化为对患者的护理。最近，许多研究人员对他们从美国国家心肺血液研究所（NHLBI）研究部门评审员处收到的评审质量表示担忧。我讨论了其中的一些问题，指出了其中的一些不足，并就如何改进基金申请的评审工作向评审人员提出了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

An open letter to the NIH cardiovascular study section reviewers.

The reviewers who serve at the National Institute of Health (NIH) study sections are in the unique position of identifying the most scientifically meritorious grant applications for consideration for funding. Consequently, the reviewers guide the direction of scientific discoveries in the US, which ultimately translate to patient care. Recently many investigators have expressed concerns about the quality of the reviews that they received from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study section reviewers. I discuss some of these concerns, identify some of the deficiencies, and make suggestions to the reviewers on how to improve their review of the grant applications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 生物-细胞生物学

CiteScore

8.30

自引率

2.30%

发文量

293

审稿时长

1.7 months

期刊介绍： Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry: An International Journal for Chemical Biology in Health and Disease publishes original research papers and short communications in all areas of the biochemical sciences, emphasizing novel findings relevant to the biochemical basis of cellular function and disease processes, as well as the mechanics of action of hormones and chemical agents. Coverage includes membrane transport, receptor mechanism, immune response, secretory processes, and cytoskeletal function, as well as biochemical structure-function relationships in the cell. In addition to the reports of original research, the journal publishes state of the art reviews. Specific subjects covered by Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry include cellular metabolism, cellular pathophysiology, enzymology, ion transport, lipid biochemistry, membrane biochemistry, molecular biology, nuclear structure and function, and protein chemistry.