Jordan Dempsey , Leo van Iersel , Mark Jones , Norbert Zeh
{"title":"A simple 4-approximation algorithm for maximum agreement forests on multiple unrooted binary trees","authors":"Jordan Dempsey , Leo van Iersel , Mark Jones , Norbert Zeh","doi":"10.1016/j.ipl.2025.106572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maximum agreement forests have been used as a measure of dissimilarity of two or more phylogenetic trees on a given set of taxa. An agreement forest is a set of trees that can be obtained from each of the input trees by deleting edges and suppressing degree-2 vertices. A maximum agreement forest is such a forest with the minimum number of components. We present a simple 4-approximation algorithm for computing a maximum agreement forest of multiple unrooted binary trees. This algorithm applies LP rounding to an extension of a recent ILP formulation of the maximum agreement forest problem on two trees by Van Wersch et al. <span><span>[13]</span></span>. We achieve the same approximation ratio as the algorithm by Chen et al. <span><span>[3]</span></span>, but our algorithm is extremely simple. We also prove that no algorithm based on the ILP formulation by Van Wersch et al. can achieve an approximation ratio of <span><math><mn>4</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>ε</mi></math></span>, for any <span><math><mi>ε</mi><mo>></mo><mn>0</mn></math></span>, even on two trees. To this end, we prove that the integrality gap of the ILP approaches 4 as the size of the two input trees grows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56290,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing Letters","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 106572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002001902500016X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A simple 4-approximation algorithm for maximum agreement forests on multiple unrooted binary trees
Maximum agreement forests have been used as a measure of dissimilarity of two or more phylogenetic trees on a given set of taxa. An agreement forest is a set of trees that can be obtained from each of the input trees by deleting edges and suppressing degree-2 vertices. A maximum agreement forest is such a forest with the minimum number of components. We present a simple 4-approximation algorithm for computing a maximum agreement forest of multiple unrooted binary trees. This algorithm applies LP rounding to an extension of a recent ILP formulation of the maximum agreement forest problem on two trees by Van Wersch et al. [13]. We achieve the same approximation ratio as the algorithm by Chen et al. [3], but our algorithm is extremely simple. We also prove that no algorithm based on the ILP formulation by Van Wersch et al. can achieve an approximation ratio of , for any , even on two trees. To this end, we prove that the integrality gap of the ILP approaches 4 as the size of the two input trees grows.
期刊介绍:
Information Processing Letters invites submission of original research articles that focus on fundamental aspects of information processing and computing. This naturally includes work in the broadly understood field of theoretical computer science; although papers in all areas of scientific inquiry will be given consideration, provided that they describe research contributions credibly motivated by applications to computing and involve rigorous methodology. High quality experimental papers that address topics of sufficiently broad interest may also be considered.
Since its inception in 1971, Information Processing Letters has served as a forum for timely dissemination of short, concise and focused research contributions. Continuing with this tradition, and to expedite the reviewing process, manuscripts are generally limited in length to nine pages when they appear in print.