Jie Yang, Yu Liu, Wenqi Wei, Sijing Xie, Xuna Tang, Li Wu, Weibin Sun
{"title":"评估牙科专业学位能力综合评估系统的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Jie Yang, Yu Liu, Wenqi Wei, Sijing Xie, Xuna Tang, Li Wu, Weibin Sun","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In accordance with the two-way integration requirements of Chinese professional degree training and resident standardization training, we have gradually established a competency comprehensive assessment system (CAS) for professional postgraduate education since 2015. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific and practicality of CAS through a Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were two parts in CAS such as dissertation of clinical study and oral clinical proficiency assessment, which including formative assessment and summative assessment. A Delphi questionnaire was scheduled to assess the acceptance about two parts of CAS. Through two rounds of questioning, forty experts were invited to score for each item according to Likert-scale. The scores were analyzed and comments were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire responses rate of two rounds were 85% and 97.1%, respectively. The reliability of the results was high with Cronbach's alpha more than 0.8 and the McDonald's omega coefficients more than 0.7. Moreover, most indicators were obtained agreement with high importance mean scores and full-score rates according to the first round. However, the scores of two indicators such as clinical chairside skill examination and patients' satisfaction were relatively low. After second round, the chairside skill examination was suggested being organized after trainees' application, or conducted by the department. The recommended evaluation methods for patients' satisfaction were telephone follow-up by hospital randomly, patients' scores to student immediately, or evaluation by teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CAS integrating research assessment with clinical assessment to evaluate the clinical competency of dental students was acceptable. Most content were highly agreed by experts, indicating the possibility of further promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi Study to Evaluate Competency Comprehensive Assessment System for Professional Degree of Dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Yang, Yu Liu, Wenqi Wei, Sijing Xie, Xuna Tang, Li Wu, Weibin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In accordance with the two-way integration requirements of Chinese professional degree training and resident standardization training, we have gradually established a competency comprehensive assessment system (CAS) for professional postgraduate education since 2015. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific and practicality of CAS through a Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were two parts in CAS such as dissertation of clinical study and oral clinical proficiency assessment, which including formative assessment and summative assessment. A Delphi questionnaire was scheduled to assess the acceptance about two parts of CAS. Through two rounds of questioning, forty experts were invited to score for each item according to Likert-scale. The scores were analyzed and comments were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire responses rate of two rounds were 85% and 97.1%, respectively. The reliability of the results was high with Cronbach's alpha more than 0.8 and the McDonald's omega coefficients more than 0.7. Moreover, most indicators were obtained agreement with high importance mean scores and full-score rates according to the first round. However, the scores of two indicators such as clinical chairside skill examination and patients' satisfaction were relatively low. After second round, the chairside skill examination was suggested being organized after trainees' application, or conducted by the department. The recommended evaluation methods for patients' satisfaction were telephone follow-up by hospital randomly, patients' scores to student immediately, or evaluation by teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CAS integrating research assessment with clinical assessment to evaluate the clinical competency of dental students was acceptable. Most content were highly agreed by experts, indicating the possibility of further promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13864\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:根据我国专业学位培养与住院医师规范化培训双向融合的要求,我院自2015年起逐步建立了专业学位研究生教育能力综合测评体系(CAS)。本研究旨在通过德尔菲研究评估CAS的科学性和实用性:方法:CAS分为临床学习论文和临床能力口语考核两部分,包括形成性考核和终结性考核。为了评估对 CAS 两部分的接受程度,我们安排了德尔菲问卷调查。通过两轮提问,邀请了 40 位专家按照李克特量表对每个项目进行打分。结果:两轮问卷的回收率分别为 85%和 97.1%。结果的信度很高,Cronbach's alpha 大于 0.8,McDonald's omega 系数大于 0.7。此外,根据第一轮的结果,大多数指标都获得了较高的重要性平均分和满分率。但临床椅旁技能检查和患者满意度等两项指标得分相对较低。第二轮后,椅旁技能考核建议由学员申请后组织,或由科室进行。对患者满意度的评价方式建议为医院随机电话随访、患者打分即时反馈给学员、教师评价等:结论:将研究评估与临床评估相结合来评价口腔医学生临床能力的 CAS 是可以接受的。结论:将研究评估与临床评估相结合的口腔医学生临床能力评估CAS是可接受的,大部分内容得到了专家的高度认同,表明有进一步推广的可能性。
Delphi Study to Evaluate Competency Comprehensive Assessment System for Professional Degree of Dentistry.
Objective: In accordance with the two-way integration requirements of Chinese professional degree training and resident standardization training, we have gradually established a competency comprehensive assessment system (CAS) for professional postgraduate education since 2015. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific and practicality of CAS through a Delphi study.
Methods: There were two parts in CAS such as dissertation of clinical study and oral clinical proficiency assessment, which including formative assessment and summative assessment. A Delphi questionnaire was scheduled to assess the acceptance about two parts of CAS. Through two rounds of questioning, forty experts were invited to score for each item according to Likert-scale. The scores were analyzed and comments were conducted.
Results: The questionnaire responses rate of two rounds were 85% and 97.1%, respectively. The reliability of the results was high with Cronbach's alpha more than 0.8 and the McDonald's omega coefficients more than 0.7. Moreover, most indicators were obtained agreement with high importance mean scores and full-score rates according to the first round. However, the scores of two indicators such as clinical chairside skill examination and patients' satisfaction were relatively low. After second round, the chairside skill examination was suggested being organized after trainees' application, or conducted by the department. The recommended evaluation methods for patients' satisfaction were telephone follow-up by hospital randomly, patients' scores to student immediately, or evaluation by teachers.
Conclusion: The CAS integrating research assessment with clinical assessment to evaluate the clinical competency of dental students was acceptable. Most content were highly agreed by experts, indicating the possibility of further promotion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.