Qinren Shi, Philippe Ciais, Hugo Anne Denier van der Gon, Emma Julie Schoenmakers, Richard Engelen, Xinyu Dou, Piyu Ke, Biqing Zhu, Zhu Liu, Frédéric Chevallier, Marc Guevara
{"title":"Comparison of High-Resolution Gridded Emission Maps of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide in Europe: GRACED & CAMS-REG","authors":"Qinren Shi, Philippe Ciais, Hugo Anne Denier van der Gon, Emma Julie Schoenmakers, Richard Engelen, Xinyu Dou, Piyu Ke, Biqing Zhu, Zhu Liu, Frédéric Chevallier, Marc Guevara","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c07289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gridded maps of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions are increasingly being applied in emission change analyses and atmospheric studies. In this study, we compared two high-resolution gridded estimates of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Europe for 2019–2021: the near-real-time Global gridded daily CO<sub>2</sub> emission data set (GRACED, latest updated version May 2024) and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service regional inventory (CAMS-REG, v6 for 2019–2020, and v7 for 2021). Total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the two data sets are comparable, with a 2.4% emission difference, and the total emissions’ spatial determination coefficient (<i>R</i>) at 0.1° is 0.66 in 2021. However, the sectoral emissions and spatial patterns show significant differences. At the grid level, the absolute value of the median of relative percent difference (RPD) of power, ground transportation, and shipping across the domain all reach 200%. CAMS-REG is recommended for fine-scale historical emission analysis in Europe due to its higher spatial resolution and the use of localized data sets. GRACED, with a maximum latency of 3 months, is more appropriate for applications requiring near-real-time data. This work characterizing the difference between two state-of-the-art emission maps is also valuable for atmospheric modelers who need to account for the uncertainty of a priori fossil fuel emissions when performing inverse calculations of land and ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sinks.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07289","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of High-Resolution Gridded Emission Maps of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide in Europe: GRACED & CAMS-REG
Gridded maps of CO2 emissions are increasingly being applied in emission change analyses and atmospheric studies. In this study, we compared two high-resolution gridded estimates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Europe for 2019–2021: the near-real-time Global gridded daily CO2 emission data set (GRACED, latest updated version May 2024) and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service regional inventory (CAMS-REG, v6 for 2019–2020, and v7 for 2021). Total CO2 emissions of the two data sets are comparable, with a 2.4% emission difference, and the total emissions’ spatial determination coefficient (R) at 0.1° is 0.66 in 2021. However, the sectoral emissions and spatial patterns show significant differences. At the grid level, the absolute value of the median of relative percent difference (RPD) of power, ground transportation, and shipping across the domain all reach 200%. CAMS-REG is recommended for fine-scale historical emission analysis in Europe due to its higher spatial resolution and the use of localized data sets. GRACED, with a maximum latency of 3 months, is more appropriate for applications requiring near-real-time data. This work characterizing the difference between two state-of-the-art emission maps is also valuable for atmospheric modelers who need to account for the uncertainty of a priori fossil fuel emissions when performing inverse calculations of land and ocean CO2 sinks.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.